Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 31 (2020): Numero 3 (September 2020)
Accesso libero
Innovative process solutions in the field of water decarbonisation as an element of integrated management in environmental protection – A case study
Arkadiusz Kamiński
Arkadiusz Kamiński
e
Michał Nadrowski
Michał Nadrowski
| 30 set 2020
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 31 (2020): Numero 3 (September 2020)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
30 set 2020
Pagine:
1 - 10
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2020-0008
Parole chiave
Water decarbonisation
,
environmental protection
,
integrated management
,
water and sewage management
© 2020 Arkadiusz Kamiński et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Diagram of the process water preparation unit for the needs of the test [own study]
Figure 2
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on oxidation inmake-upw ater [own study]
Figure 3
Clear reduction of the bleeding (desalination) as a result of improved cooling water parameters [own study]
Figure 4
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on total hardness inmake-up water [owns tudy]
Figure 5
Make-up water intake in a selected period (27.06.2018–01.09.2018) of 2018 [own study]
Figure 6
Make-up water intake in the selected period (27.06.2019–01.09.2019) of 2019 during the test [own study]
Figure 7
Illustration of the number of starts of the 190P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2018–01.09.2018. 500 kW pump power. [own study]
Figure 8
Illustration of the numberofstarts of the190 P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2019–01.09.2019. 500 kW pump power [own study]
Figure 9
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system [own study]
Figure 10
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system. Visible improvement of the situation after adding more decarbonised water [own study]
Production capacity of a water production unit [own study]
No.
Product
Production [m
3
/h]
Production [m
3
/day]
Production [m
3
/year]
1.
Decarbonised water
2,500
60,000
21,900,000
2.
Process water
2,500
60,000
21,900,000
3.
Utility and fire-fighting water
1,200
28,800
10,512,000