This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Diagram of the process water preparation unit for the needs of the test [own study]
Figure 2
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on oxidation inmake-upw ater [own study]
Figure 3
Clear reduction of the bleeding (desalination) as a result of improved cooling water parameters [own study]
Figure 4
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on total hardness inmake-up water [owns tudy]
Figure 5
Make-up water intake in a selected period (27.06.2018–01.09.2018) of 2018 [own study]
Figure 6
Make-up water intake in the selected period (27.06.2019–01.09.2019) of 2019 during the test [own study]
Figure 7
Illustration of the number of starts of the 190P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2018–01.09.2018. 500 kW pump power. [own study]
Figure 8
Illustration of the numberofstarts of the190 P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2019–01.09.2019. 500 kW pump power [own study]
Figure 9
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system [own study]
Figure 10
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system. Visible improvement of the situation after adding more decarbonised water [own study]
Production capacity of a water production unit [own study]