Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 31 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
Open Access
Innovative process solutions in the field of water decarbonisation as an element of integrated management in environmental protection – A case study
Arkadiusz Kamiński
Arkadiusz Kamiński
and
Michał Nadrowski
Michał Nadrowski
| Sep 30, 2020
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 31 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Sep 30, 2020
Page range:
1 - 10
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2020-0008
Keywords
Water decarbonisation
,
environmental protection
,
integrated management
,
water and sewage management
© 2020 Arkadiusz Kamiński et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Diagram of the process water preparation unit for the needs of the test [own study]
Figure 2
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on oxidation inmake-upw ater [own study]
Figure 3
Clear reduction of the bleeding (desalination) as a result of improved cooling water parameters [own study]
Figure 4
Impact of a larger share of decarbonised water on total hardness inmake-up water [owns tudy]
Figure 5
Make-up water intake in a selected period (27.06.2018–01.09.2018) of 2018 [own study]
Figure 6
Make-up water intake in the selected period (27.06.2019–01.09.2019) of 2019 during the test [own study]
Figure 7
Illustration of the number of starts of the 190P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2018–01.09.2018. 500 kW pump power. [own study]
Figure 8
Illustration of the numberofstarts of the190 P1 (booster) pump - water intake on the Vistula River 27.06.2019–01.09.2019. 500 kW pump power [own study]
Figure 9
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system [own study]
Figure 10
Microbiological contamination of circulating water on the example of a selected refrigeration system. Visible improvement of the situation after adding more decarbonised water [own study]
Production capacity of a water production unit [own study]
No.
Product
Production [m
3
/h]
Production [m
3
/day]
Production [m
3
/year]
1.
Decarbonised water
2,500
60,000
21,900,000
2.
Process water
2,500
60,000
21,900,000
3.
Utility and fire-fighting water
1,200
28,800
10,512,000