[
Alpay, G., Bodur, M., Yilmaz, C., and Buyukbalci, P. 2012. How does innovativeness yield superior firm performance? The role of marketing effectiveness. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 14 (1): 107–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, J. C. 1987. An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties. Management Science 3 (4): 525–541.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andreeva, T., and Kianto, A. 2012. Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. In Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (4): 617-636. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., Li, J., and de Arroyabe, J. C. F. 2019. An integrated model of organisational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity. Journal of Business Research 105 (August): 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bäckström, I., and Bengtsson, L. 2019. A mapping study of employee innovation: proposing a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management 22 (3): 468– 492. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2018-0101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., and Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3): 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barney, J. B., and Clark, D. N. 2007. Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X382046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, B. E., and Huselid, M. A. 1998. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 16: 53-101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., and Boon, C. 2005. Commonalities and contradictions in research on human resource management and performance. Human Resource Management Journal 15 (3): 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boxall, P., and Purcell, J. 2000. Strategic human resource management: where have we come from and where should we be going?. International Journal of Management Reviews 2 (2): 183-203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell, D. T. 1955. The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of sociology 60 (4): 339-342.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, S., Gong, Y., and Shum, C. 2011. International Journal of Hospitality Management Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (4): 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, J.S., Tsou, T. T., and Huang, A. YH. 2009. Service Delivery Innovation: Antecedents and Impact on Firm Performance. Journal of Service Research 12 (1): 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509338619
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chowhan, J. 2016. Unpacking the black box: Understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Journal 26 (2): 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12097
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J. E., and Delgado-Verde, M. 2015. Open search strategies and firm performance: The different moderating role of technological environmental dynamism. Technovation, 35: 32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damanpour, F., and Schneider, M. 2006. Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers. British Journal of Management 17 (3): 215–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delery, J. E., and Doty, D. H. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal 39 (4): 802-835.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamantopoulos, A., and Siguaw, J. A. 2000. Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diaz-Fernandez, M., Bornay-Barrachina, M., and Lopez-Cabrales, A. 2017. HRM practices and innovation performance: a panel-data approach. International Journal of Manpower 38 (3): 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2015-0028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dibrell, C., Craig, J. B., and Neubaum, D. O. 2014. Linking the formal strategic planning process, planning flexibility, and innovativeness to firm performance. Journal of Business Research 67 (9): 2000–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duodu, B., and Rowlinson, S. 2019. The effect of social capital on exploratory and exploitative innovation: Modelling the mediating role of absorptive capability. European Journal of Innovation Management 23 (4): 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2018-0178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., and Puumalainen, K. 2008. The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management 11 (2): 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810869848
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engelsberger, A., Halvorsen, B., Cavanagh, J., and Bartram, T. 2021. Human resource management and open innovation: the role of open innovation mindset. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 60 (1): 194-215 https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Exposito, A., and Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. 2018. Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 36 (8): 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618782596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farouk, S., Abu Elanain, H. M., Obeidat, S. M., and Al-Nahya, M. 2016. HRM Practices and Organizational Performance in the UAE Banking Sector : the Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation Introduction Human resource management (HRM). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 65 (6): 1–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fay, D., Shipton, H., West, M. A., and Patterson, M. 2015. Teamwork and organizational innovation: The moderating role of the HRM context. Creativity and Innovation Management 24 (2): 261-277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., and Ferreira, F. A. F. 2019. To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research 101 (November): 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flores-Garcia, E., Bruch, J., Wiktorsson, M., and Jackson, M. 2021. Decision-making approaches in process innovations: an explorative case study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 32 (9): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., and O’Regan, P. 2015. How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?. Employee Relations 37 (2): 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldstein, I. L. 1993. Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development and Evaluation. 3rd ed., Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gope, S., Elia, G., and Passiante, G. 2018. The effect of HRM practices on knowledge management capacity: a comparative study in Indian IT industry. Journal of Knowledge Management 22 (3): 649-677. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gould-Williams, J., and Davies, F. 2005. Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes: An analysis of public sector workers. Public Management Review 7 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903042000339392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., and Alpkan, L. 2011. Effects of Innovation types on firm performances. International Journal of Production Economics 133 (2): 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. In Prentice-Hall, Inc (Seventh ed). https://doi.org/10.1038/259433b0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York, New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayton, J. C. 2005. Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review 15 (1): 21-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, L. A., Tedards, E., and Swan, T. 2021. Drive Innovation with Better Decision-Making, Harvard Business Review. November-December 2021. Harvard Business School Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsu, I. C., Lin, C. Y. Y., Lawler, J., and Wu, S. H. 2007. Toward a model of organizational human capital development: Preliminary evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Business Review 13 (2): 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380701233547
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Javalgi, R. G., and Todd, P. R. 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation, management commitment, and human capital: The internationalization of SMEs in India. Journal of Business Research 64 (9): 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiang, J., Wang, S., and Zhao, S. 2012. Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management 23 (19): 4025–4047. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.690567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiménez-Jiménez, D., and Sanz-Valle, R. 2008. Could HRM support organizational innovation?. International Journal of Human Resource Management 19 (7): 1208–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802109952
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jotabá, M.N., Fernandes, C.I., Gunkel, M., and Kraus, S. 2022. Innovation and human resource management: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management 25 (6): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kianto, A., Sáenz, J., and Aramburu, N. 2017. Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Business Research 81 (July): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knoke, D., and Kalleberg, A. L. 1994. Job training in US organizations. American sociological review, pp. 537-546.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ko, J., and Hur, S. 2014. The Impacts of Employee Benefits, Procedural Justice, and Managerial Trustworthiness on Work Attitudes: Integrated Understanding Based on Social Exchange Theory. Public Administration Review 74 (2): 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohn, A. 1993. Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review 71 (5): 54–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kutieshat, R., and Farmanesh P. 2022. The Impact of New Human Resource Management Practices on Innovation Performance during the COVID 19 Crisis: A New Perception on Enhancing the Educational Sector. Sustainability 14 (5): 2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052872
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, F.H., Lee, T.Z., and Wu, W.Y. 2010. The relationship between human resource management practices, business strategy and firm performance: evidence from steel industry in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21 (9): 1351–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.488428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, R., Lee, J. H., and Garrett, T. C. 2019. Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research 99 (August): 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Y., Zhao, Y., and Liu, Y. 2006. The relationship between HRM, technology innovation and performance in China. International Journal of Manpower 27 (7): 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610708284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ling, T. C., and Nasurdin, A. M. 2010. Human resource management practices and organizational innovation: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Business Research 26 (4): 105-115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lu, Y., and Ramamurthy, K. (Ram). 2011. Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: an Empirical Examination. MIS Quarterly 35 (4): 931–954.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., and Almsafir, M. K. 2018. Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research 94 (February): 320-334 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maier, A., Brad, S., Nicoara, D., and Maier, D. 2014. Innovation by developing human resources, ensuring the competitiveness and success of the organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109: 645 – 648.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mäkelä, K., Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Smale, A., and Sumelius, J. 2013. Explaining stakeholder evaluations of HRM capabilities in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies 44 (8): 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martinez-Sanchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., and Pérez-Pérez, M. 2020. The strategy of human resource flexibility versus absorptive capacity of knowledge: An integrative framework in industrial firms. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michie, J., and Sheehan‐Quinn, M. 2001. Labour market flexibility, human resource management and corporate performance. British journal of management 12 (4): 287-306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mothe, C., and Uyen Nguyen Thi, T. 2010. The link between non‐technological innovations and technological innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 13 (3): 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011060148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Natalicchio, A., Petruzzelli, A.M., Cardinali, S., and Savino, T. 2018. Open innovation and the human resource dimension. Management Decision 56 (6): 1271-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2017-0268
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez-López, S., and Alegre, J. 2012. Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 112 (4): 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211225521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perez Lopez, S., Montes Peon, J. M., and Vazquez Ordas, C. J. 2005. Human Resource Practices, Organizational Learning and Business Performance. Human Resource Development International 8 (2): 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500100103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pradana, M., Pérez-Luño, A., and Fuentes-Blasco, M. 2020. Innovation as the key to gain performance from absorptive capacity and human capital. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (7): 822-834, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1714578
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prange, C., and Pinho, J. C. 2017. How personal and organizational drivers impact on SME international performance: The mediating role of organizational innovation. International Business Review 26 (6): 1114-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 (3): 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prieto, I. M., and Pérez-Santana, M. P. 2014. Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review 43 (2): 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Probst, T. M. 2005. Countering the Negative Effects of Job Insecurity Through Participative Decision-making: Lessons from the Demand–Control Model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 10 (4): 320–329. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanders, K., and Lin, C. H. 2016. Human resource management and innovative behaviour: considering interactive, informal learning activities. In Human resource management, innovation and performance, pp. 32-47, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saridakis, G., Lai, Y., and Cooper, C. L. 2017. Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Human Resource Management Review 27 (1): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle. R. H., and Ball, K. S. 2003. Supporting Innovation through HR Policy: Evidence from the UK. Creativity and Innovation Management 12 (1): 50-62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaw, J., Dineen, B., Fang, R., and Vellella, R. 2009. Employee-organization exchange relationships, hrm practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal 52 (5): 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.44635525
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheehan, M. 2014. Human resource management and performance: Evidence from small and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal 32 (5): 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612465454
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snape, E., and Redman, T. 2010. HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of management studies 47 (7): 1219-1247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology 13: 290-312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soomro, B. A., Mangi, S., and Shah, N. 2020. Strategic factors and significance of organizational innovation and organizational learning in organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2019-0114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Su, Z., Chen, J., Guo, H., and Wang, D. 2022. Top management team’s participative decision-making, heterogeneity, and management innovation: an information processing perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 39 (1): 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09752-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svačina, P. 2020. Rewarding employee inventions in corporations: Designing a framework to evaluate adequacy of remuneration and offering an optimal remuneration system. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2019-0178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsai, K.H., and Yang, S.Y. 2013. Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Industrial Marketing Management 42 (8): 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsou, H. T., and Cheng, C. C. J. 2018. How to enhance IT B2B service innovation? An integrated view of organizational mechanisms. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 33 (7): 984–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2017-0175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Un, C. A., and Asakawa, K. 2015. Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (1): 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12229
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science 32 (5): 590–607.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, S., and Gustafsson, A. 2020. Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research 118: 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., and Neely, A. 2016. Only the Brave: Product Innovation, Service Business Model Innovation, and Their Impact on Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 33 (1): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, C., and Ahmed, P. 2004. The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management 7 (4): 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, M. A., and Sacramento, C. A. 2012. Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity, pp. 359–385. London: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yukl, G. 1989. Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management 15 (2): 251-289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Y., Liu, G., Chang, X., and Wang, L. 2020. The impact of HRM digitalization on firm performance: investigating three-way interactions. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 59 (1): 20-43, https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12258
]Search in Google Scholar
, 