Accesso libero

Study on Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Twaron® Fabric Subjected to Double-Impactor Impact from a Numerical Analysis Perspective

Canyi Huang

Canyi Huang

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Huang, Canyi
, 
Lina Cui

Lina Cui

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cui, Lina
, 
Yiping Qiu

Yiping Qiu

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Qiu, Yiping
 e 
Yajun Liu

Yajun Liu

Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu UniversityUeda, Japan
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Liu, Yajun
  
19 apr 2023
Study on Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Twaron® Fabric Subjected to Double-Impactor Impact from a Numerical Analysis Perspective's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Scarica la copertina
Categoria dell'articolo: Research Article
Pubblicato online: 19 apr 2023
Pagine: 38 - 51
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2023-0005
Parole chiave
© 2023 Łukasiewicz Research Network-Łódź Institute of Technology, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1.

Schematics of impact tester 9250HV
Schematics of impact tester 9250HV

Fig. 2.

Both specimen sides after impact at 10m/s
Both specimen sides after impact at 10m/s

Fig. 3.

Comparison of simulation and experiment results: (a) energy absorption, (b) residual velocity, (c) F-T curve
Comparison of simulation and experiment results: (a) energy absorption, (b) residual velocity, (c) F-T curve

Fig. 4.

Impact model
Impact model

Fig. 5.

Schematic of impact center locations
Schematic of impact center locations

Fig. 6.

Comparison of resistance force history in different asymmetrical impact scenarios: (a) resistance force applied to impactor O, (b) resistance force applied to impactor N (with an impactor impacting the fabric center), (c) resistance force applied to impactor N (without impactor impacting the fabric center)
Comparison of resistance force history in different asymmetrical impact scenarios: (a) resistance force applied to impactor O, (b) resistance force applied to impactor N (with an impactor impacting the fabric center), (c) resistance force applied to impactor N (without impactor impacting the fabric center)

Fig. 7.

Comparison of resistance force history in different symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of resistance force history in different symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 8.

Comparison of failure deflection of impactors in different impact scenarios: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios; (b) symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of failure deflection of impactors in different impact scenarios: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios; (b) symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 9.

Energy cost of impactors and total energy absorption of fabric: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios, (b) symmetrical impact scenarios
Energy cost of impactors and total energy absorption of fabric: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios, (b) symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 10.

Comparison of fabric’s stress distribution contours in asymmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric’s stress distribution contours in asymmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 11.

Comparison of fabric’s transverse deformation in asymmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric’s transverse deformation in asymmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 12.

Comparison of fabric stress distribution contours in symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric stress distribution contours in symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 13.

Comparison of fabric transverse deformation in symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric transverse deformation in symmetrical impact scenarios

Impact results of the effect of velocity on the fabric’s impact behaviors in scenario IOC

Vo (m/s) VC (m/s) MF0 (N) MFC (N) TO (ms) TC (ms) ET (J)
10 10 467.3 559.5 0.580 0.468 1.62
10 9 496.1 546.4 0.603 0.512 1.59
10 8 519.4 510.8 0.626 0.554 1.46
10 7 553.9 481.2 0.642 0.607 1.38
9 10 458.8 559.3 0.712 0.474 1.54
8 10 452.1 561.6 0.806 0.478 1.46
7 10 446.4 560.3 0.938 0.466 1.40

Impact results of the effect of velocity on the fabric’s impact behaviors in scenario IDD1

V1(m/s) V2 (m/s) MF1(N) MF2(N) T1(ms) T2(ms) ET (J)
10 10 753.6 753.6 0.684 0.684 2.20
10 9 761.3 687.4 0.692 0.721 2.04
10 8 766.6 566.9 0.696 0.743 1.92
10 7 769.8 552.3 0.699 0.776 1.66
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
Volume Open
Argomenti della rivista:
Economia e business, Business management, Informatica del business, Process Management, Chimica idustriale, Cellulosa, carta e tessuti, Scienza e tecnologia dei polimeri, Scienze materiali, Biomateriali e materiali naturali
Feed RSS della rivista