Acceso abierto

Study on Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Twaron® Fabric Subjected to Double-Impactor Impact from a Numerical Analysis Perspective

Canyi Huang

Canyi Huang

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Huang, Canyi
, 
Lina Cui

Lina Cui

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cui, Lina
, 
Yiping Qiu

Yiping Qiu

College of Textiles and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal UniversityQuanzhou, China
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Qiu, Yiping
 y 
Yajun Liu

Yajun Liu

Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu UniversityUeda, Japan
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Liu, Yajun
  
19 abr 2023
Study on Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Twaron® Fabric Subjected to Double-Impactor Impact from a Numerical Analysis Perspective's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Categoría del artículo: Research Article
Publicado en línea: 19 abr 2023
Páginas: 38 - 51
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2023-0005
Palabras clave
© 2023 Łukasiewicz Research Network-Łódź Institute of Technology, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1.

Schematics of impact tester 9250HV
Schematics of impact tester 9250HV

Fig. 2.

Both specimen sides after impact at 10m/s
Both specimen sides after impact at 10m/s

Fig. 3.

Comparison of simulation and experiment results: (a) energy absorption, (b) residual velocity, (c) F-T curve
Comparison of simulation and experiment results: (a) energy absorption, (b) residual velocity, (c) F-T curve

Fig. 4.

Impact model
Impact model

Fig. 5.

Schematic of impact center locations
Schematic of impact center locations

Fig. 6.

Comparison of resistance force history in different asymmetrical impact scenarios: (a) resistance force applied to impactor O, (b) resistance force applied to impactor N (with an impactor impacting the fabric center), (c) resistance force applied to impactor N (without impactor impacting the fabric center)
Comparison of resistance force history in different asymmetrical impact scenarios: (a) resistance force applied to impactor O, (b) resistance force applied to impactor N (with an impactor impacting the fabric center), (c) resistance force applied to impactor N (without impactor impacting the fabric center)

Fig. 7.

Comparison of resistance force history in different symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of resistance force history in different symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 8.

Comparison of failure deflection of impactors in different impact scenarios: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios; (b) symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of failure deflection of impactors in different impact scenarios: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios; (b) symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 9.

Energy cost of impactors and total energy absorption of fabric: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios, (b) symmetrical impact scenarios
Energy cost of impactors and total energy absorption of fabric: (a) asymmetrical impact scenarios, (b) symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 10.

Comparison of fabric’s stress distribution contours in asymmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric’s stress distribution contours in asymmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 11.

Comparison of fabric’s transverse deformation in asymmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric’s transverse deformation in asymmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 12.

Comparison of fabric stress distribution contours in symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric stress distribution contours in symmetrical impact scenarios

Fig. 13.

Comparison of fabric transverse deformation in symmetrical impact scenarios
Comparison of fabric transverse deformation in symmetrical impact scenarios

Impact results of the effect of velocity on the fabric’s impact behaviors in scenario IOC

Vo (m/s) VC (m/s) MF0 (N) MFC (N) TO (ms) TC (ms) ET (J)
10 10 467.3 559.5 0.580 0.468 1.62
10 9 496.1 546.4 0.603 0.512 1.59
10 8 519.4 510.8 0.626 0.554 1.46
10 7 553.9 481.2 0.642 0.607 1.38
9 10 458.8 559.3 0.712 0.474 1.54
8 10 452.1 561.6 0.806 0.478 1.46
7 10 446.4 560.3 0.938 0.466 1.40

Impact results of the effect of velocity on the fabric’s impact behaviors in scenario IDD1

V1(m/s) V2 (m/s) MF1(N) MF2(N) T1(ms) T2(ms) ET (J)
10 10 753.6 753.6 0.684 0.684 2.20
10 9 761.3 687.4 0.692 0.721 2.04
10 8 766.6 566.9 0.696 0.743 1.92
10 7 769.8 552.3 0.699 0.776 1.66
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
Volume Open
Temas de la revista:
Negocios y Economía, Gestión empresarial, Informática de negocios, Gestión de proceso, Química Industrial, Celulosa, papel y textiles, Ciencia y tecnología de polímeros, Ciencia de los materiales, Biomateriales y materiales naturales
RSS Feed de revista