Review of Carbon Emission and Carbon Neutrality in the Life Cycle of Silk Products

1 Babu KM. Natural textile fibres: Animal and silk fibres. In: Rose S, editors. Textiles and Fashion-Materials, Design and Technology. Cambridge (UK): Number 126. The Textile Institute and Woodhead, 2015; p. 57–78. BabuKM Natural textile fibres: Animal and silk fibres In: RoseS editors. Textiles and Fashion-Materials, Design and Technology Cambridge (UK) Number 126. The Textile Institute and Woodhead 2015 57 78 10.1016/B978-1-84569-931-4.00003-9 Search in Google Scholar

2 International Sericultural Commission (ISC) Statistics of global silk production. Available online: https://inserco.org/en/statistics (accessed on 6 January 2022). International Sericultural Commission (ISC) Statistics of global silk production Available online: https://inserco.org/en/statistics (accessed on 6 January 2022). Search in Google Scholar

3 ISO 14067: Greenhouse Gases-Carbon Footprint of Products-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland. 2018. ISO 14067 Greenhouse Gases-Carbon Footprint of Products-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Geneva, Switzerland 2018 Search in Google Scholar

4 Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, et al. Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and Role in Tracking Human Pressure on The Planet. Ecological Indicators 2012; 16(SI): 100–112. GalliA WiedmannT ErcinE Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and Role in Tracking Human Pressure on The Planet Ecological Indicators 2012 16 SI 100 112 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017 Search in Google Scholar

5 Muthu. Handbook of Sustainable Apparel Production: CRC Press; 2015. Muthu Handbook of Sustainable Apparel Production CRC Press 2015 10.1201/b18428 Search in Google Scholar

6 Zhao NH, Zhou X, Dong F. Carbon footprint assessment of polyester textiles. China Dyeing & Finishing 2012; 38(14):42–45. ZhaoNH ZhouX DongF Carbon footprint assessment of polyester textiles China Dyeing & Finishing 2012 38 14 42 45 Search in Google Scholar

7 Cheng Y, Liang H. Calculation and Evaluation of Industrial Carbon Footprint of Cotton Denim Jacket. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 2021; 16: 1–8. ChengY LiangH Calculation and Evaluation of Industrial Carbon Footprint of Cotton Denim Jacket Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 2021 16 1 8 10.1177/15589250211020387 Search in Google Scholar

8 Dong YH, Qian JF, Xue WL. Research on Carbon Footprint of Cotton Textiles. Shanghai Textile Science & Technology 2012; 40(4): 1–2+50. DongYH QianJF XueWL Research on Carbon Footprint of Cotton Textiles Shanghai Textile Science & Technology 2012 40 4 1 2+50 Search in Google Scholar

9 Ventura A, Senga KT, Cazacliu B, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Process Modeling in a Life Cycle Context: A Case Study of Hemp Crop Production. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2015; 19(6): 978–993. VenturaA SengaKT CazacliuB Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Process Modeling in a Life Cycle Context: A Case Study of Hemp Crop Production Journal of Industrial Ecology 2015 19 6 978 993 10.1111/jiec.12228 Search in Google Scholar

10 González-García S, Hospido A, Feijoo G, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Raw Materials for Non-Wood Pulp Mills: Hemp and Flax. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010; 54(11): 923–930. González-GarcíaS HospidoA FeijooG Life Cycle Assessment of Raw Materials for Non-Wood Pulp Mills: Hemp and Flax Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010 54 11 923 930 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.011 Search in Google Scholar

11 Wiedemann SG, Biggs L, Nebel B, et al. Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production, use, and End-of-Life of a Woollen Garment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2020; 25(8):1486–1499. WiedemannSG BiggsL NebelB Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production, use, and End-of-Life of a Woollen Garment The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2020 25 8 1486 1499 10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0 Search in Google Scholar

12 Peri PL, Rosas YM, Ladd B et al. Carbon Footprint of Lamb and Wool Production at Farm Gate and the Regional Scale in Southern Patagonia. Sustainability 2020; 12(8): 3077. PeriPL RosasYM LaddB Carbon Footprint of Lamb and Wool Production at Farm Gate and the Regional Scale in Southern Patagonia Sustainability 2020 12 8 3077 10.3390/su12083077 Search in Google Scholar

13 van der Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG. LCA Benchmarking Study on Textiles Made of Cotton, Polyester, Nylon, Acryl, or Elastane. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2014; 19(2): 331–356. van der VeldenNM PatelMK VogtländerJG LCA Benchmarking Study on Textiles Made of Cotton, Polyester, Nylon, Acryl, or Elastane The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2014 19 2 331 356 10.1007/s11367-013-0626-9 Search in Google Scholar

14 Barcelos SMBD, Salvador R, Guedes MG, et al. Opportunities for Improving the Environmental Profile of Silk Cocoon Production Under Brazilian Conditions. Sustainability 2020; 12(8): 3214. BarcelosSMBD SalvadorR GuedesMG Opportunities for Improving the Environmental Profile of Silk Cocoon Production Under Brazilian Conditions Sustainability 2020 12 8 3214 10.3390/su12083214 Search in Google Scholar

15 Astudillo MF, Thalwitz G, Vollrath F. Life Cycle Assessment of Indian Silk. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014; 81: 158–167. AstudilloMF ThalwitzG VollrathF Life Cycle Assessment of Indian Silk Journal of Cleaner Production 2014 81 158 167 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.007 Search in Google Scholar

16 Ren YE, Yin JY, Wang XP. Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Textiles. Consume Guide 2016; 66(10): 33–35. RenYE YinJY WangXP Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Textiles Consume Guide 2016 66 10 33 35 Search in Google Scholar

17 Jiang T, Chen ZY, Yao TT, et al. Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) Assessment of Gambiered Canton Silk. China Dyeing & Finishing 2012; 38(8): 39–41. JiangT ChenZY YaoTT Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) Assessment of Gambiered Canton Silk China Dyeing & Finishing 2012 38 8 39 41 Search in Google Scholar

18 Faragò S, Sorlini M. Silk, History, Processes, Environment[EB/OL]. 2019. Available online: https://www.innovhub-ssi.it/media/pubblicazioni/seta-storia-processi-ambiente.kl (accessed on 30 October 2021). FaragòS SorliniM Silk, History, Processes, Environment[EB/OL] 2019 Available online: https://www.innovhub-ssi.it/media/pubblicazioni/seta-storia-processi-ambiente.kl (accessed on 30 October 2021) Search in Google Scholar

19 Yin R, Xiang Y F, Zhang Z H, et al. Cleaner Production of Mulberry Spun Silk Yarns Via a Shortened and Gassing-Free Production Route. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 278: 123690. YinR XiangY F ZhangZ H Cleaner Production of Mulberry Spun Silk Yarns Via a Shortened and Gassing-Free Production Route Journal of Cleaner Production 2021 278 123690 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123690 Search in Google Scholar

20 Giacomin AM, Garcia Jr JB, Zonatti WF et al. Brazilian Silk Production: Economic and Sustainability Aspects. Procedia Engineering 2017; 200: 89–95. GiacominAM GarciaJBJr ZonattiWF Brazilian Silk Production: Economic and Sustainability Aspects Procedia Engineering 2017 200 89 95 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.014 Search in Google Scholar

21 Astudillo MF, Thalwitz G, Vollrath F. Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Production - A Case Study from India. In: Subramanian S M, editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing. Woodhead Publishing 2015; 255–274. AstudilloMF ThalwitzG VollrathF Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Production - A Case Study from India In: SubramanianS M editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing Woodhead Publishing 2015 255 274 10.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00011-3 Search in Google Scholar

22 Li Y, Wang Y, He Q, et al. Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(4): 1339. LiY WangY HeQ Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020 17 4 1339 10.3390/ijerph17041339706830032092957 Search in Google Scholar

23 Giacomin AM, Garcia JB, Zonatti WF et al. Silk Industry and Carbon Footprint Mitigation. Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing 2017; 254(19): 192008. GiacominAM GarciaJB ZonattiWF Silk Industry and Carbon Footprint Mitigation Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing 2017 254 19 192008 10.1088/1757-899X/254/19/192008 Search in Google Scholar

24 Garcia JB Jr, Silk Industry and the Millennial Generation’ S Desire of Carbon Footprint Mitigation, in: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Advanced Textile Science and Technology & The International Seminar on Silk Fashion Design and Development Trend -ISATST, Hangzhou (China), Oct. 13–14, 2016, 35–38. GarciaJBJr Silk Industry and the Millennial Generation’ S Desire of Carbon Footprint Mitigation in: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Advanced Textile Science and Technology & The International Seminar on Silk Fashion Design and Development Trend -ISATST Hangzhou (China) Oct. 13–14, 2016 35 38 Search in Google Scholar

25 Srikantaswamy K, Bindroo BB. Organic Farming–An Option for Carbon Sequestration Technology for the Sustainable Mulberry Leaf Production and Climate Protection. Journal of Innovative Research and Solution 2014; 196–205. SrikantaswamyK BindrooBB Organic Farming–An Option for Carbon Sequestration Technology for the Sustainable Mulberry Leaf Production and Climate Protection Journal of Innovative Research and Solution 2014 196 205 Search in Google Scholar

26 Zhao ZY. Demonstration and Extension of Good Quality and High Yield Cultivation Techniques in Mulberry Field of Dry Sloping Land. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020; 66(10): 102–104. ZhaoZY Demonstration and Extension of Good Quality and High Yield Cultivation Techniques in Mulberry Field of Dry Sloping Land Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020 66 10 102 104 Search in Google Scholar

27 Xie W. The Cultivation and Silk Rearing Performance of Nongsang No.14 In Fenggang County. Agricultural Technology Service 2020; 37(10): 1–2. XieW The Cultivation and Silk Rearing Performance of Nongsang No.14 In Fenggang County. Agricultural Technology Service 2020 37 10 1 2 Search in Google Scholar

28 Jing XR. Preliminary Report on the Investigation of Sericulture Production Role in the Effect of Improving The Environment. Bulletin of Sericulture 2008; 39(4): 35–37. JingXR Preliminary Report on the Investigation of Sericulture Production Role in the Effect of Improving The Environment Bulletin of Sericulture 2008 39 4 35 37 Search in Google Scholar

29 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Action plan for high-quality development of silk industry(2021–2025). 2020. Available online: https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/xfpgys/wjfb/art/2020/art_a57fd110740b49fdb7ad8efa728364f0.html (accessed on 30 October 2021). Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China Action plan for high-quality development of silk industry(2021–2025) 2020 Available online: https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/xfpgys/wjfb/art/2020/art_a57fd110740b49fdb7ad8efa728364f0.html (accessed on 30 October 2021) Search in Google Scholar

30 Qian YQ, 2019. Silk Yearbook of China (2017–2018), Periodicals agency of Zhejiang sci-tech university, Hangzhou. QianYQ 2019 Silk Yearbook of China (2017–2018) Periodicals agency of Zhejiang sci-tech university Hangzhou Search in Google Scholar

31 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Crops and Livestock Products. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 6 January 2022). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Crops and Livestock Products Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 6 January 2022) Search in Google Scholar

32 Tenriawaru AN, Fudjaja L, Jamil MH et al. Natural silk agroindustry in Wajo Regency. Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing 2021; 807(3): 032057. TenriawaruAN FudjajaL JamilMH Natural silk agroindustry in Wajo Regency Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing 2021 807 3 032057 10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032057 Search in Google Scholar

33 Babu KM. Silk: Processing, Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing, 2018. BabuKM Silk: Processing, Properties and Applications Woodhead Publishing 2018 Search in Google Scholar

34 De Saxce M, Pesnel S, Perwuelz A. LCA of Bed Sheets–Some Relevant Parameters for Lifetime Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012; 37: 221–228. De SaxceM PesnelS PerwuelzA LCA of Bed Sheets–Some Relevant Parameters for Lifetime Assessment Journal of Cleaner Production 2012 37 221 228 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.012 Search in Google Scholar

35 Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) 2012 Final Report - A Carbon Footprint for UK Clothing and Opportunities For Savings. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306145659_A_Carbon_Footprint_for_UK_Clothing_and_Opportunities_for_Savings (accessed on 30 October 2021). Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) 2012 Final Report A Carbon Footprint for UK Clothing and Opportunities For Savings Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306145659_A_Carbon_Footprint_for_UK_Clothing_and_Opportunities_for_Savings (accessed on 30 October 2021) Search in Google Scholar

36 Zhang Y, Kang H, Hou H et al. Improved Design for Textile Production Process Based on Life Cycle Assessment. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2018; 20(6): 1355–1365. ZhangY KangH HouH Improved Design for Textile Production Process Based on Life Cycle Assessment Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2018 20 6 1355 1365 10.1007/s10098-018-1572-9 Search in Google Scholar

37 Steinberger JK, Friot D, Jolliet O, et al. A Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Inventory of the Global Textile Chain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2009; 14(5): 443–455. SteinbergerJK FriotD JollietO A Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Inventory of the Global Textile Chain The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2009 14 5 443 455 10.1007/s11367-009-0078-4 Search in Google Scholar

38 Bertram RF, Chi T. A Study of Companies’ Business Responses to Fashion E-Commerce’s Environmental Impact. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 2018; 11(2): 254–264. BertramRF ChiT A Study of Companies’ Business Responses to Fashion E-Commerce’s Environmental Impact International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 2018 11 2 254 264 10.1080/17543266.2017.1406541 Search in Google Scholar

39 Yun C, Islam M I, LeHew M, et al. Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts Made by the Reduced Laundering of Self-Cleaning Fabrics. Fibers and Polymers 2016; 17(8): 1296–1304. YunC IslamM I LeHewM Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts Made by the Reduced Laundering of Self-Cleaning Fabrics Fibers and Polymers 2016 17 8 1296 1304 10.1007/s12221-016-6320-3 Search in Google Scholar

40 Li JH, Wu X, Ding XM, et al. Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint Assessment of Textile and Garment in Use Stage. Paper presented at: China Household Appliances Technology Conference in 2019, China Household Appliances Technology Conference Proceedings. Foshan, Guangdong, China, 2019:6. LiJH WuX DingXM Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint Assessment of Textile and Garment in Use Stage Paper presented at: China Household Appliances Technology Conference in 2019, China Household Appliances Technology Conference Proceedings Foshan, Guangdong, China 2019 6 Search in Google Scholar

41 Laitala K, Klepp I G, Henry B. Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type. Sustainability 2018; 10(7): 2524. LaitalaK KleppI G HenryB Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type Sustainability 2018 10 7 2524 10.3390/su10072524 Search in Google Scholar

42 Eryuruk SH. Life Cycle Assessment Method for Environmental Impact Evaluation and Certification Systems for Textiles and Clothing. In: Subramanian S M, editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing. Woodhead Publishing, 2015; p. 125–148. EryurukSH Life Cycle Assessment Method for Environmental Impact Evaluation and Certification Systems for Textiles and Clothing In: SubramanianS M editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing Woodhead Publishing 2015 125 148 10.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00007-1 Search in Google Scholar

43 Blackburn RS. Sustainable apparel: production, processing and recycling. Woodhead Publishing; 2015. BlackburnRS Sustainable apparel: production, processing and recycling Woodhead Publishing 2015 Search in Google Scholar

44 Sandin G, Peters G M. Environmental Impact of Textile Reuse and Recycling–A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 184: 353–365. SandinG PetersG M Environmental Impact of Textile Reuse and Recycling–A Review Journal of Cleaner Production 2018 184 353 365 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 Search in Google Scholar

45 Munasinghe P, Druckman A, Dissanayake D G K. A Systematic Review of the Life Cycle Inventory of Clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 320: 128852. MunasingheP DruckmanA DissanayakeD G K A Systematic Review of the Life Cycle Inventory of Clothing Journal of Cleaner Production 2021 320 128852 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128852 Search in Google Scholar

46 Nivedita S. Recent Developments in Recycling Silk Saris. In: Nivedita S, Gargi, editors. Functional Textiles and Clothing. Springer, Singapore 2019; 363–369. NiveditaS Recent Developments in Recycling Silk Saris In: NiveditaS Gargi editors. Functional Textiles and Clothing Springer Singapore 2019 363 369 10.1007/978-981-13-7721-1_28 Search in Google Scholar

47 Lee H, Park SJ, Lee M, et al. Fabrication of Nanofibers Using Fibroin Regenerated by Recycling Waste Silk Selvage. Polymer Bulletin 2020; 77(7): 3853–3862. LeeH ParkSJ LeeM Fabrication of Nanofibers Using Fibroin Regenerated by Recycling Waste Silk Selvage Polymer Bulletin 2020 77 7 3853 3862 10.1007/s00289-020-03113-7 Search in Google Scholar

48 Song R, Kimura T, Ino H. Papermaking from Waste Silk and Its Application as Reinforcement of Green Composite. Journal of Textile Engineering 2010; 56(3): 71–76. SongR KimuraT InoH Papermaking from Waste Silk and Its Application as Reinforcement of Green Composite Journal of Textile Engineering 2010 56 3 71 76 10.4188/jte.56.71 Search in Google Scholar

49 Liu Sy, Zhu Zy, Qiu Xx, et al. Research Progress in the Environmental Performance Assessment of Silk Product Life Cycle. Journal of Silk, 2021, 58(11): 5–9. LiuSy ZhuZy QiuXx Research Progress in the Environmental Performance Assessment of Silk Product Life Cycle Journal of Silk 2021 58 11 5 9 Search in Google Scholar