This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Babu KM. Natural textile fibres: Animal and silk fibres. In: Rose S, editors. Textiles and Fashion-Materials, Design and Technology. Cambridge (UK): Number 126. The Textile Institute and Woodhead, 2015; p. 57–78.BabuKMNatural textile fibres: Animal and silk fibresIn:RoseSeditors.Cambridge (UK)Number 126.The Textile Institute and Woodhead2015577810.1016/B978-1-84569-931-4.00003-9Search in Google Scholar
International Sericultural Commission (ISC) Statistics of global silk production. Available online: https://inserco.org/en/statistics (accessed on 6 January 2022).International Sericultural Commission (ISC)Available online: https://inserco.org/en/statistics (accessed on 6 January 2022).Search in Google Scholar
ISO 14067: Greenhouse Gases-Carbon Footprint of Products-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland. 2018.ISO 14067International Organization for Standardization (ISO)Geneva, Switzerland2018Search in Google Scholar
Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, et al. Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and Role in Tracking Human Pressure on The Planet. Ecological Indicators 2012; 16(SI): 100–112.GalliAWiedmannTErcinEIntegrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and Role in Tracking Human Pressure on The Planet201216SI10011210.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017Search in Google Scholar
Muthu. Handbook of Sustainable Apparel Production: CRC Press; 2015.MuthuCRC Press201510.1201/b18428Search in Google Scholar
Zhao NH, Zhou X, Dong F. Carbon footprint assessment of polyester textiles. China Dyeing & Finishing 2012; 38(14):42–45.ZhaoNHZhouXDongFCarbon footprint assessment of polyester textiles201238144245Search in Google Scholar
Cheng Y, Liang H. Calculation and Evaluation of Industrial Carbon Footprint of Cotton Denim Jacket. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 2021; 16: 1–8.ChengYLiangHCalculation and Evaluation of Industrial Carbon Footprint of Cotton Denim Jacket2021161810.1177/15589250211020387Search in Google Scholar
Dong YH, Qian JF, Xue WL. Research on Carbon Footprint of Cotton Textiles. Shanghai Textile Science & Technology 2012; 40(4): 1–2+50.DongYHQianJFXueWLResearch on Carbon Footprint of Cotton Textiles201240412+50Search in Google Scholar
Ventura A, Senga KT, Cazacliu B, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Process Modeling in a Life Cycle Context: A Case Study of Hemp Crop Production. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2015; 19(6): 978–993.VenturaASengaKTCazacliuBSensitivity Analysis of Environmental Process Modeling in a Life Cycle Context: A Case Study of Hemp Crop Production201519697899310.1111/jiec.12228Search in Google Scholar
González-García S, Hospido A, Feijoo G, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Raw Materials for Non-Wood Pulp Mills: Hemp and Flax. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010; 54(11): 923–930.González-GarcíaSHospidoAFeijooGLife Cycle Assessment of Raw Materials for Non-Wood Pulp Mills: Hemp and Flax2010541192393010.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.011Search in Google Scholar
Wiedemann SG, Biggs L, Nebel B, et al. Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production, use, and End-of-Life of a Woollen Garment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2020; 25(8):1486–1499.WiedemannSGBiggsLNebelBEnvironmental Impacts Associated with the Production, use, and End-of-Life of a Woollen Garment20202581486149910.1007/s11367-020-01766-0Search in Google Scholar
Peri PL, Rosas YM, Ladd B et al. Carbon Footprint of Lamb and Wool Production at Farm Gate and the Regional Scale in Southern Patagonia. Sustainability 2020; 12(8): 3077.PeriPLRosasYMLaddBCarbon Footprint of Lamb and Wool Production at Farm Gate and the Regional Scale in Southern Patagonia2020128307710.3390/su12083077Search in Google Scholar
van der Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG. LCA Benchmarking Study on Textiles Made of Cotton, Polyester, Nylon, Acryl, or Elastane. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2014; 19(2): 331–356.van der VeldenNMPatelMKVogtländerJGLCA Benchmarking Study on Textiles Made of Cotton, Polyester, Nylon, Acryl, or Elastane201419233135610.1007/s11367-013-0626-9Search in Google Scholar
Barcelos SMBD, Salvador R, Guedes MG, et al. Opportunities for Improving the Environmental Profile of Silk Cocoon Production Under Brazilian Conditions. Sustainability 2020; 12(8): 3214.BarcelosSMBDSalvadorRGuedesMGOpportunities for Improving the Environmental Profile of Silk Cocoon Production Under Brazilian Conditions2020128321410.3390/su12083214Search in Google Scholar
Astudillo MF, Thalwitz G, Vollrath F. Life Cycle Assessment of Indian Silk. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014; 81: 158–167.AstudilloMFThalwitzGVollrathFLife Cycle Assessment of Indian Silk20148115816710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.007Search in Google Scholar
Ren YE, Yin JY, Wang XP. Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Textiles. Consume Guide 2016; 66(10): 33–35.RenYEYinJYWangXPLife Cycle Assessment of Silk Textiles201666103335Search in Google Scholar
Jiang T, Chen ZY, Yao TT, et al. Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) Assessment of Gambiered Canton Silk. China Dyeing & Finishing 2012; 38(8): 39–41.JiangTChenZYYaoTTProduct Carbon Footprint (PCF) Assessment of Gambiered Canton Silk20123883941Search in Google Scholar
Faragò S, Sorlini M. Silk, History, Processes, Environment[EB/OL]. 2019. Available online: https://www.innovhub-ssi.it/media/pubblicazioni/seta-storia-processi-ambiente.kl (accessed on 30 October 2021).FaragòSSorliniM2019Available online: https://www.innovhub-ssi.it/media/pubblicazioni/seta-storia-processi-ambiente.kl (accessed on 30 October 2021)Search in Google Scholar
Yin R, Xiang Y F, Zhang Z H, et al. Cleaner Production of Mulberry Spun Silk Yarns Via a Shortened and Gassing-Free Production Route. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 278: 123690.YinRXiangY FZhangZ HCleaner Production of Mulberry Spun Silk Yarns Via a Shortened and Gassing-Free Production Route202127812369010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123690Search in Google Scholar
Giacomin AM, Garcia Jr JB, Zonatti WF et al. Brazilian Silk Production: Economic and Sustainability Aspects. Procedia Engineering 2017; 200: 89–95.GiacominAMGarciaJBJrZonattiWFBrazilian Silk Production: Economic and Sustainability Aspects2017200899510.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.014Search in Google Scholar
Astudillo MF, Thalwitz G, Vollrath F. Life Cycle Assessment of Silk Production - A Case Study from India. In: Subramanian S M, editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing. Woodhead Publishing 2015; 255–274.AstudilloMFThalwitzGVollrathFLife Cycle Assessment of Silk Production - A Case Study from IndiaIn:SubramanianS Meditors.Woodhead Publishing201525527410.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00011-3Search in Google Scholar
Li Y, Wang Y, He Q, et al. Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(4): 1339.LiYWangYHeQCalculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China2020174133910.3390/ijerph17041339706830032092957Search in Google Scholar
Giacomin AM, Garcia JB, Zonatti WF et al. Silk Industry and Carbon Footprint Mitigation. Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing 2017; 254(19): 192008.GiacominAMGarciaJBZonattiWF2541919200810.1088/1757-899X/254/19/192008Search in Google Scholar
Garcia JB Jr, Silk Industry and the Millennial Generation’ S Desire of Carbon Footprint Mitigation, in: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Advanced Textile Science and Technology & The International Seminar on Silk Fashion Design and Development Trend -ISATST, Hangzhou (China), Oct. 13–14, 2016, 35–38.GarciaJBJrin:Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Advanced Textile Science and Technology & The International Seminar on Silk Fashion Design and Development Trend -ISATSTHangzhou (China)Oct. 13–14, 20163538Search in Google Scholar
Srikantaswamy K, Bindroo BB. Organic Farming–An Option for Carbon Sequestration Technology for the Sustainable Mulberry Leaf Production and Climate Protection. Journal of Innovative Research and Solution 2014; 196–205.SrikantaswamyKBindrooBBOrganic Farming–An Option for Carbon Sequestration Technology for the Sustainable Mulberry Leaf Production and Climate Protection2014196205Search in Google Scholar
Zhao ZY. Demonstration and Extension of Good Quality and High Yield Cultivation Techniques in Mulberry Field of Dry Sloping Land. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020; 66(10): 102–104.ZhaoZYDemonstration and Extension of Good Quality and High Yield Cultivation Techniques in Mulberry Field of Dry Sloping Land20206610102104Search in Google Scholar
Xie W. The Cultivation and Silk Rearing Performance of Nongsang No.14 In Fenggang County. Agricultural Technology Service 2020; 37(10): 1–2.XieWThe Cultivation and Silk Rearing Performance of Nongsang No.14In2020371012Search in Google Scholar
Jing XR. Preliminary Report on the Investigation of Sericulture Production Role in the Effect of Improving The Environment. Bulletin of Sericulture 2008; 39(4): 35–37.JingXRPreliminary Report on the Investigation of Sericulture Production Role in the Effect of Improving The Environment20083943537Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Action plan for high-quality development of silk industry(2021–2025). 2020. Available online: https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/xfpgys/wjfb/art/2020/art_a57fd110740b49fdb7ad8efa728364f0.html (accessed on 30 October 2021).Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China2020Available online: https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/xfpgys/wjfb/art/2020/art_a57fd110740b49fdb7ad8efa728364f0.html (accessed on 30 October 2021)Search in Google Scholar
Qian YQ, 2019. Silk Yearbook of China (2017–2018), Periodicals agency of Zhejiang sci-tech university, Hangzhou.QianYQ2019Periodicals agency of Zhejiang sci-tech universityHangzhouSearch in Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Crops and Livestock Products. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 6 January 2022).Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 6 January 2022)Search in Google Scholar
Tenriawaru AN, Fudjaja L, Jamil MH et al. Natural silk agroindustry in Wajo Regency. Paper presented at: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing 2021; 807(3): 032057.TenriawaruANFudjajaLJamilMHNatural silk agroindustry in Wajo Regency2021807303205710.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032057Search in Google Scholar
Babu KM. Silk: Processing, Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing, 2018.BabuKMWoodhead Publishing2018Search in Google Scholar
De Saxce M, Pesnel S, Perwuelz A. LCA of Bed Sheets–Some Relevant Parameters for Lifetime Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012; 37: 221–228.De SaxceMPesnelSPerwuelzALCA of Bed Sheets–Some Relevant Parameters for Lifetime Assessment20123722122810.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.012Search in Google Scholar
Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) 2012 Final Report - A Carbon Footprint for UK Clothing and Opportunities For Savings. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306145659_A_Carbon_Footprint_for_UK_Clothing_and_Opportunities_for_Savings (accessed on 30 October 2021).Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) 2012 Final ReportAvailable online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306145659_A_Carbon_Footprint_for_UK_Clothing_and_Opportunities_for_Savings (accessed on 30 October 2021)Search in Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Kang H, Hou H et al. Improved Design for Textile Production Process Based on Life Cycle Assessment. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2018; 20(6): 1355–1365.ZhangYKangHHouHImproved Design for Textile Production Process Based on Life Cycle Assessment20182061355136510.1007/s10098-018-1572-9Search in Google Scholar
Steinberger JK, Friot D, Jolliet O, et al. A Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Inventory of the Global Textile Chain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2009; 14(5): 443–455.SteinbergerJKFriotDJollietOA Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Inventory of the Global Textile Chain200914544345510.1007/s11367-009-0078-4Search in Google Scholar
Bertram RF, Chi T. A Study of Companies’ Business Responses to Fashion E-Commerce’s Environmental Impact. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 2018; 11(2): 254–264.BertramRFChiTA Study of Companies’ Business Responses to Fashion E-Commerce’s Environmental Impact201811225426410.1080/17543266.2017.1406541Search in Google Scholar
Yun C, Islam M I, LeHew M, et al. Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts Made by the Reduced Laundering of Self-Cleaning Fabrics. Fibers and Polymers 2016; 17(8): 1296–1304.YunCIslamM ILeHewMAssessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts Made by the Reduced Laundering of Self-Cleaning Fabrics20161781296130410.1007/s12221-016-6320-3Search in Google Scholar
Li JH, Wu X, Ding XM, et al. Carbon Footprint and Water Footprint Assessment of Textile and Garment in Use Stage. Paper presented at: China Household Appliances Technology Conference in 2019, China Household Appliances Technology Conference Proceedings. Foshan, Guangdong, China, 2019:6.LiJHWuXDingXMPaper presented at: China Household Appliances Technology Conference in 2019, China Household Appliances Technology Conference ProceedingsFoshan, Guangdong, China20196Search in Google Scholar
Laitala K, Klepp I G, Henry B. Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type. Sustainability 2018; 10(7): 2524.LaitalaKKleppI GHenryBDoes Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type2018107252410.3390/su10072524Search in Google Scholar
Eryuruk SH. Life Cycle Assessment Method for Environmental Impact Evaluation and Certification Systems for Textiles and Clothing. In: Subramanian S M, editors. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing. Woodhead Publishing, 2015; p. 125–148.EryurukSHLife Cycle Assessment Method for Environmental Impact Evaluation and Certification Systems for Textiles and ClothingIn:SubramanianS Meditors.Woodhead Publishing201512514810.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00007-1Search in Google Scholar
Blackburn RS. Sustainable apparel: production, processing and recycling. Woodhead Publishing; 2015.BlackburnRSWoodhead Publishing2015Search in Google Scholar
Sandin G, Peters G M. Environmental Impact of Textile Reuse and Recycling–A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 184: 353–365.SandinGPetersG MEnvironmental Impact of Textile Reuse and Recycling–A Review201818435336510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266Search in Google Scholar
Munasinghe P, Druckman A, Dissanayake D G K. A Systematic Review of the Life Cycle Inventory of Clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 320: 128852.MunasinghePDruckmanADissanayakeD G KA Systematic Review of the Life Cycle Inventory of Clothing202132012885210.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128852Search in Google Scholar
Nivedita S. Recent Developments in Recycling Silk Saris. In: Nivedita S, Gargi, editors. Functional Textiles and Clothing. Springer, Singapore 2019; 363–369.NiveditaSRecent Developments in Recycling Silk SarisIn:NiveditaSGargieditors.SpringerSingapore201936336910.1007/978-981-13-7721-1_28Search in Google Scholar
Lee H, Park SJ, Lee M, et al. Fabrication of Nanofibers Using Fibroin Regenerated by Recycling Waste Silk Selvage. Polymer Bulletin 2020; 77(7): 3853–3862.LeeHParkSJLeeMFabrication of Nanofibers Using Fibroin Regenerated by Recycling Waste Silk Selvage20207773853386210.1007/s00289-020-03113-7Search in Google Scholar
Song R, Kimura T, Ino H. Papermaking from Waste Silk and Its Application as Reinforcement of Green Composite. Journal of Textile Engineering 2010; 56(3): 71–76.SongRKimuraTInoHPapermaking from Waste Silk and Its Application as Reinforcement of Green Composite2010563717610.4188/jte.56.71Search in Google Scholar
Liu Sy, Zhu Zy, Qiu Xx, et al. Research Progress in the Environmental Performance Assessment of Silk Product Life Cycle. Journal of Silk, 2021, 58(11): 5–9.LiuSyZhuZyQiuXxResearch Progress in the Environmental Performance Assessment of Silk Product Life Cycle2021581159Search in Google Scholar