[
[1] Directive EU 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018L2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Van D, Fujuwara T, Leu Tho B, Toan P, Minh G. A review of anaerobic digestion systems for biodegradable waste: Configurations, operating parameters, and current trends. Environ Eng Res. 2020;25(1):1-17. DOI: 10.4491/eer.2018.334.10.4491/eer.2018.334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Appels L, Lauwers J, Degréve J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K. Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2011;15(9):4295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.121.10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Shahbaz M, Ammar M, Zou D, Korai RM, Li X. An insight into the anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and food waste: influence of co-substrate mixture ratio and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;187(4):1356-70. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-018-2891-3.10.1007/s12010-018-2891-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Geršl M, Kanduč T, Matýsek D, Šotnar M, Mareček J. The role of mineral phases in the biogas production technology. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018;25(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0003.10.1515/eces-2018-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Komilis D, Barrena R, Grando RL, Vogiatzi V, Sánchez A, Font X. A state of the art literature review on anaerobic digestion of food waste: influential operating parameters on methane yield. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2017;16(2):347-60. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-017-9428-z.10.1007/s11157-017-9428-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Braber K. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: A modern waste disposal option on the verge of breakthrough. Biomass Bioenergy. 1995; 9(1-5):365-76. DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00103-4.10.1016/0961-9534(95)00103-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Wrońska I, Cybulska K. Quantity and quality of biogas produced from the poultry sludge optimized by filamentous fungi. Ecol Chem Eng. S. 2018;25(3):395-404. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0027.10.1515/eces-2018-0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Gruber-Brunhumer MR, Montgomery M, Nussbaumer M, Schoeppa T, Zohard E, Mucciod M, et al. Effects of partial maize silage substitution with microalgae on viscosity and biogas yields in continuous AD trials. J Biotechnol. 2019;295:80-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.02.004.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.02.00430853635
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2011;31(8):1737-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021.10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.02121530224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Panigrahi S, Dubey B. A critical review on operating parameters and strategies to improve the biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew Energy. 2019;143:779-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.040.10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Andersen L, Lamp A, Dieckmann C, Baetge S, Schmidt L, Kaltschmitt M. Biogas plants as key units of biorefinery concepts: Options and their assessment. J Biotechnol. 2018; 283:130-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.041.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: Status and future trends. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003;109(1-3):95-106. DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95.10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2011;15(1):821-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042.10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Wilkie CA, Riedesel KJ, Owens MJ. Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy. 2000;19(2):63-102. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00017-910.1016/S0961-9534(00)00017-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Moestedt J, Påledal S, Schnürer A, Nordell E. Biogas production from thin stillage on an industrial scale -Experience and optimisation. Energies. 2013;6(11):5642-55. DOI: 10.3390/en6115642.10.3390/en6115642
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Drosg B, Fuchs W, Meixner K, Waltenberger R, Kirchmayr R, Braun R et al. Anaerobic digestion of stillage fractions - estimation of the potential for energy recovery in bioethanol plants. Water Sci Technol. 2013;67(3):494-505. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.574.10.2166/wst.2012.574
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Oh ST, Martin AD. Glucose contents in anaerobic ethanol stillage digestion manipulate thermodynamic driving force in between hydrogenophilic and acetoclastic methanogens. Chem Eng J. 2014;243:526-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.085.10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Fuess LT, Garcia ML. Bioenergy from stillage anaerobic digestion to enhance the energy balance ratio of ethanol production. J Environ Manage. 2015;162:102-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.046.10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.04626233583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Schmidt T, Pröter J, Scholwin F, Nelles M. Anaerobic digestion of grain stillage at high organic loading rates in three different reactor systems. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;55:285-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.010.10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Carvalho F, Prazeres AR, Rivas J. Cheese whey wastewater: Characterization and treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2013;385-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.038.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.03823376111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Perle M, Kimchie S, Shelef G. Some biochemical aspects of the anaerobic degradation of dairy wastewater. Water Res. 1995;29(6):1549-54. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00248-6.10.1016/0043-1354(94)00248-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Damasceno FRC, Freire DMG, Cammarota MC. Impact of the addition of an enzyme pool on an activated sludge system treating dairy wastewater under fat shock loads. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83(5):730-8. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1863.10.1002/jctb.1863
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Erdirencelebi D. Treatment of high-fat-containing dairy wastewater in a sequential UASBR system: influence of recycle. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2011;86(4):525-33. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2546.10.1002/jctb.2546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Tawfik A, Sobhey M, Badawy M. Treatment of a combined dairy and domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor followed by activated sludge (AS system). Desalination. 2008;227(1-3):167-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.023.10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Gupta P, Singh RS, Sachan A, Vidyarthi AS, Gupta A. Study on biogas production by anaerobic digestion of garden-waste. Fuel. 2012;95:495-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.006.10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4044-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Zhang B, Zhang LL, Zhang SC, Shi HZ, Cai WM. The influence of pH on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Environ Technol. 2005;26(3):329-40. DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618563.10.1080/09593332608618563
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Latif MA, Mehta CM, Batstone DJ. Influence of low pH on continuous anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Res. 2017;113:42-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.002.10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[30] Lin JG, Chang CN, Chang SC. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by alkaline solubilization. Bioresour Technol. 1997;62(3):85-90. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00121-1.10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00121-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Salehian P, Karimi K, Zilouei H, Jeihanipour A. Improvement of biogas production from pine wood by alkali pretreatment. Fuel. 2013;106:484-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.092.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[32] Ali S, Hua B, Huang JJ, Droste RL, Zhou Q, Zhao W, et al. Effect of different initial low pH conditions on biogas production, composition, and shift in the aceticlastic methanogenic population. Bioresour Technol. 2019;289. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121579.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12157931228742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[33] Gupta VK, Mittal A, Malviya A, Mittal J. Adsorption of carmoisine A from wastewater using waste materials - Bottom ash and deoiled soya. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;335(1):24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.056.10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.05619423127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[34] Yin C, Shen Y, Zhu N, Huang Q, Lou Z, Yuan H. Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with incineration bottom ash: Enhanced methane production and CO2 sequestration. Appl Energy. 2018;215:503-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.056.10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[35] Fialová J, Hybská H, Mitterpach J, Samešová D, Kovalíček J, Surový J. et al. Bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration. Basic parameters and ecotoxicological properties. Environ Prot Eng. 2019;45(3):113-26. DOI: 10.37190/epe190308.10.37190/epe190308
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[36] ISO 10390:2005. Soil quality - Determination of pH. Available from: https://www.sutn.sk/eshop/public/standard_detail.aspx?id=99350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[37] EN 14346. Characterization of waste - Calculation of dry matter by determination of dry residue or water content, 2006, 24. Available from: https://www.en-standard.eu/din-en-14346-characterization-of-waste-calculation-of-dry-matter-by-determination-of-dry-residue-or-water-content/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[38] EN 15169:2007. Characterization of waste - Determination of loss on ignition in waste, sludge and sediments. Available from: https://www.en-standard.eu/din-en-15169-characterization-of-waste-determination-of-loss-on-ignition-in-waste-sludge-and-sediments/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] ISO 6060:1989. Water quality. Determination of the chemical oxygen demand. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/12260.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[40] ISO 5815:1989 (modified) Water quality. Determination of biochemical oxygen demand after n days (BODn). Part 2: Method for undiluted samples. Available from: https://v1.cecdn.yun300.cn/site_1809120263/ISO%2005815-2-20031547185585637.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[41] EN 15309:2007. Characterization of waste and soil - Determination of elemental composition by X-ray fluorescence. Available from: https://www.sutn.sk/eshop/public/standard_detail.aspx?id=104563.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[42] EN 16192:2012. Characterization of waste. Analysis of eluates. Available from: https://www.en-standard.eu/din-en-16192-characterization-of-waste-analysis-of-eluates/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[43] EN ISO 11734:1998. Water quality. Evaluation of the “ultimate” anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in digested sludge. Method by measurement of the biogas production. Available from: https://www.sutn.sk/eshop/public/standard_detail.aspx?id=79120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[44] Sayedin F, Kermanshahi-Pour A, He QS. Evaluating the potential of a novel anaerobic baffled reactor for anaerobic digestion of thin stillage: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and recycle ratio. Renew Energy. 2019;135:975-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.084.10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[45] Comino E, Riggio VA, Rosso M. Biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and cheese whey. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.090.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.09022444637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[46] Kavacik B, Topaloglu B. Biogas production from co-digestion of a mixture of cheese whey and dairy manure. Biomass Bioenergy. 2010;34(9):1321-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.006.10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[47] Lo HM, Kurniawan TA, Sillanpää MET, Pai TY, Chiang CF, Chao KP, et al. Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(16):6329-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.048.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.04820400299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[48] Yin C, Shen Y, Yu Y, Yuan H, Lou Z, Zhu N. In-situ biogas upgrading by a stepwise addition of ash additives: Methanogen Adaption and CO2 sequestration. Bioresour Technol. 2019;282:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.110.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.11030844515
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[49] Lo HM, Chiu HY, Lo SW, Lo FC. Effects of different SRT on anaerobic digestion of MSW dosed with various MSWI ashes. Bioresour Technol. 2012;125:233-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.084.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.08423026339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[50] Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(17):7928-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044.10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.04418406612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[51] Latif MA, Mehta CM, Batstone DJ. Low pH anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge for enhanced phosphorous release. Water Res. 2015;81:288-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.062.10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.06226081435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[52] Ponsá S, Ferrer I, Vázquez F, Font X. Optimization of the hydrolytic-acidogenic anaerobic digestion stage (55°C) of sewage sludge: Influence of pH and solid content. Water Res. 2008; 42(14):3972-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.002.10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.00218687452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[53] Sanberg M, Ahring BK. Anaerobic treatment of fish meal process wastewater in a UASB reactor at high pH. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1992;36(6):800-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00172198.10.1007/BF00172198
]Search in Google Scholar