Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 71 (2020): Numero 1 (March 2020)
Accesso libero
Cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of juglone: a comparison of free and nano-encapsulated form
Semiha Erisen
Semiha Erisen
,
Tülin Arasoğlu
Tülin Arasoğlu
,
Banu Mansuroglu
Banu Mansuroglu
,
İsmail Kocacaliskan
İsmail Kocacaliskan
e
Serap Derman
Serap Derman
| 09 apr 2020
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 71 (2020): Numero 1 (March 2020)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Original article
Pubblicato online:
09 apr 2020
Pagine:
69 - 77
Ricevuto:
01 ott 2019
Accettato:
01 feb 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3344
© 2020 Semiha Erisen, Tülin Arasoğlu, Banu Mansuroglu, İsmail Kocacaliskan, Serap Derman, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Chemical structure of juglone (A) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (B)
Figure 2
Particle size distribution (A), scanning electron microscopy image (B), FT-IR spectra (C), and release pattern (D) of nanoparticles
Figure 3
Viability of L929 fibroblasts treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of quadruple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 4
Viability of alfalfa cells treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of triple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 5
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA98 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA98-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA98+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA98-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA98+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (1 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Figure 6
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA100 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA100-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA100+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA100-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA100+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (2.5 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Physicochemical properties of juglone loaded PLGA nanoparticles
Encapsulating efficiency (%)
Drug loading (%)
Particle size (nm)
Zeta potential (mV)
Polydispersity index
29.95±2.8
15.42±2.1
213.33±5.2
-14.58±2.8
0.115±0.03