Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Édition 71 (2020): Edition 1 (March 2020)
Accès libre
Cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of juglone: a comparison of free and nano-encapsulated form
Semiha Erisen
Semiha Erisen
,
Tülin Arasoğlu
Tülin Arasoğlu
,
Banu Mansuroglu
Banu Mansuroglu
,
İsmail Kocacaliskan
İsmail Kocacaliskan
et
Serap Derman
Serap Derman
| 09 avr. 2020
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Édition 71 (2020): Edition 1 (March 2020)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Original article
Publié en ligne:
09 avr. 2020
Pages:
69 - 77
Reçu:
01 oct. 2019
Accepté:
01 févr. 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3344
© 2020 Semiha Erisen, Tülin Arasoğlu, Banu Mansuroglu, İsmail Kocacaliskan, Serap Derman, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Chemical structure of juglone (A) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (B)
Figure 2
Particle size distribution (A), scanning electron microscopy image (B), FT-IR spectra (C), and release pattern (D) of nanoparticles
Figure 3
Viability of L929 fibroblasts treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of quadruple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 4
Viability of alfalfa cells treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of triple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Figure 5
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA98 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA98-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA98+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA98-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA98+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (1 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Figure 6
Potential mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA100 treated with 0.31−10 μmol/L juglone: (A) TA100-S9 treated with JNPs; (B) TA100+S9 treated with JNPs; (C) TA100-S9 treated with free juglone; (D) TA100+S9 treated with free juglone; PC – positive control: 2-NF (2 μg/mL) and 4-NQO (0.1 μg/mL) without S9 and 2-AA (2.5 μg/mL) with S9; NC – negative control: water; *B value ≥0.99
Physicochemical properties of juglone loaded PLGA nanoparticles
Encapsulating efficiency (%)
Drug loading (%)
Particle size (nm)
Zeta potential (mV)
Polydispersity index
29.95±2.8
15.42±2.1
213.33±5.2
-14.58±2.8
0.115±0.03