Walnut preparations are used in traditional medicine for the treatment of many health problems such as fungal, bacterial, viral, and helminthic infections, hypotension, hypoglycaemia, and even cancer (1). Walnut has the highest concentrations of an allelochemical molecule which is an amber pigment largely responsible for its biological activity (Figure 1) (2). Juglone is found in the root, leaves, bark, and nuts of several walnut species of the
Chemical structure of juglone (A) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (B)
Nowadays, new antibiotics are needed to address increasing antimicrobial resistance, but their development and approval cannot keep up the pace with this issue (8). It is therefore essential to develop new antibacterials with different bacterial killing mechanisms than those of conventional antibiotics. Considering its high antimicrobial effect against infections, juglone bears a promise in this respect. It has already been evidenced for herbicidal (9), antibacterial (10, 11, 12, 13), antiviral (14), antifungal (15, 16), antioxidant (13), antiparasitic (17), and anticancer (18, 19, 20) properties. However, its hydrophobic structure and high toxicity limit its application in biological systems (2, 4).
A promising strategy to overcome this limitation of juglone and many other materials comes with nanosized drug delivery systems, which have attracted considerable interest in recent years (21, 22). Nanoparticulate systems provide greater biocompatibility and bioavailability and lower the doses of active substances, still achieving the desired effect through controlled release (23, 24). This is particularly true for polymeric nanoparticles such as the poly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymer, as it increases biocompatibility and therapeutic index of active ingredients (Figure 1) (22). Biodegradation of PLGA does not lead to toxicity. Lactic acid from hydrolysis products enters the tricarboxylic acid cycle and is excreted as carbon dioxide and water. Glycolic acid is likewise metabolised to carbon dioxide and water or directly excreted from the kidneys (25).
The aim of this study was therefore to compare cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of juglone-loaded polymeric nanoparticles (JNPs) with those of free juglone. For this purpose, we encapsulated juglone in PLGA nanoparticles, and characterised their physicochemical and release profile. Then, for the first time in literature, we compared the cytotoxic activity of JNPs with juglone in plant cell (alfalfa) and mouse cell culture (L929 fibroblast cells). Additionally, we investigated their mutagenic potential in
Juglone (Mw: 174.15 g/mol, CAS Number: 481-39-0), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Mw 31–50 kDa, 87–89 % hydrolyzed, CAS Number: 9002-89-5), PLGA (50:50 lactide:glicolide; inherent viscosity 0.45−0.60 dL/g, Mw ~38−54 kDa, CAS Number: 26780-50-7), and dichloromethane (DCM, CAS Number: 75-09-2) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Plant suspension cultures were established from alfalfa (
The mouse fibroblast cell line L929 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) / Ham’s Nutrient Mixture F-12 medium, foetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, and L-glutamine used in the preparation of fibroblast cell cultures were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The Ames Microplate Format Mutagenicity Assay™ 98/100 kit and strains were provided from Anaria-Xenometrix (Mason, OH, USA). All the chemicals and solvents used for mutagenicity study were of analytical grade. Ultra-pure water was obtained from the Millipore MilliQ Gradient system (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA)
Juglone-loaded nanoparticles (JNPs) were synthesised using the single-emulsion solvent evaporation method described in our previous study (16) with minor modifications. 20 mg of juglone and 100 mg of PLGA were first dissolved in 3.5 mL DCM and stirred to ensure that all materials were dissolved. The obtained organic phase was added dropwise to 8 mL of aqueous PVA solution (3 % w/v) over an ice bath, and the mixture was sonicated with a microtip probe sonicator (HD3100, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany, output power 100 W) at 80 % power for 2 min. The obtained oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion was then diluted in 35 mL of PVA solution (0.1 % w/v) and mixed on a magnetic stirrer at room temperature overnight for the organic solvent to evaporate. The obtained nanoparticles were centrifuged at 10,000x
Encapsulation efficiency and drug loading were determined by indirect quantification using UV-vis spectroscopy (UV 1800, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). UV absorbance of the supernatant was analysed at 424 nm in triplicate. Juglone concentration was calculated using a previously constructed standard calibration curve (26). Encapsulation efficiency (EE) and drug loading (DL) of juglone were calculated as follows:
The mean diameter, particle size distribution, zeta potential (ζ), and polydispersity index (PDI) of the nanoparticles were investigated by photon correlation spectroscopy using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, UK) instrument (27). Nanoparticles were also inspected for shape and surface morphology with scanning electron microscopy (SEM, A JSM-7001FA, Jeol, Japan) as previously described in our studies (10), with an acceleration voltage of 10−30 kV. Successful encapsulation of juglone was evidenced with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) using an IR-Prestige 21 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in ATR mode. The FT-IR spectra ranging between 600 and 4000 cm-1 were obtained with resolution of 4 cm-1 (28).
Juglone release was established with a modified dissolution method in triplicate, in which 5 mg of nanoparticles were suspended in 2 mL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and incubated 37 °C in a shaking incubator (150 rpm) at pH of 7.2 (16). The suspensions were centrifuged and the obtained precipitates, resuspended with 2 mL of fresh PBS, and supernatants analysed with UV-vis spectroscopy at 424 nm. The amount of released juglone was calculated using a previously constructed calibration curve (26).
L929 fibroblast cell lines were grown at 37 °C in DMEM/Ham’s Nutrient Mixture F-12 medium (1:1) supplemented with 10 % FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 units/ mL penicillin, and 0.2 mmol/L L-glutamine in an atmosphere of 95 % air and 5 % CO2. The medium was changed every two days. The morphology of the cells was examined with an Olympus phase contrast microscope (Olympus CKX41, Tokyo, Japan) at 5x magnification.
The cytotoxic potential of juglone was quantified with the MTT assay (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (29) following the ISO 10993-5 procedure (30). Briefly, 5×103 fibroblast cells per well were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and then exposed to free and nano-encapsulated juglone in concentrations of 5, 27, 83, 160, 250, 500, and 1000 μmol/L suspended in DMEM/ Ham’s Nutrient Mixture F-12 medium (1:1). Following 24- and 48-hour incubation, the supernatant from each well was replaced with fresh MTT reagent in the final concentration of 50 μg/mL of medium. The cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, and their viability determined by measuring absorbance at 570 nm in a universal microplate reader. Control growth was considered to be 100 % viable. Metabolic activity was expressed as mean±SD. Cell viability (%) was calculated as follows:
Leaf explants (5–6 cm) removed from
Alfalfa cells were exposed to the same free and nano-encapsulated juglone concentrations as the mouse cells. 100 μL free or nano-encapsulated juglone solutions were added to 4 mL of 5–6 day old alfalfa suspension cultures under continuous agitation at 110 rpm in an orbital shaker. After 24 and 48 h of incubation, cell suspensions (1 mL) were transferred to tubes and centrifuged at 445x
To determine juglone mutagenicity we chose the Ames MPF assay as a method that shows reverse mutagenicity in
The mutagenic activity of free and nano-encapsulated juglone was determined with the Ames MPF™ 98/100 bacterial reverse mutation assay (Anaria-Xenometrix, Mason, OH, USA) with or without the metabolic activation of the rat liver S9 microsomal fraction. The study was carried out in accordance with the kit protocol (32). 2-nitrofluorene (2NF; 2 μg/mL), 4-nitroquinalone-
Juglone cytotoxicity to the
Cytotoxicity results [means of four (mammalian cells) and three (plant cells) independent treatments repeated for all groups, starting with the cell growth step] were analysed with a GraphPad Prism6 software (San Diego, CA, USA). The differences between JNPs and free juglone within each dose were determined using the
The criteria for the evaluation of mutagenicity results (means ± standard deviations of the number of revertant wells) were the number of positive wells and dose dependency (32, 34, 36). The data were evaluated with the cumulative binomial distribution test according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The increase of revertants relative to the solvent control was determined by dividing the mean number of positive wells (yellow well) at each dose with solvent control baseline, which is obtained by adding one standard deviation to the mean number of positive wells of the solvent control. A twofold or higher increase over baseline was considered a mutagenic effect. The dose-response relationship and the differences were considered significant when the binomial value was ≥99 % (21).
Table 1 shows the physicochemical properties of JNPs. In terms of encapsulation efficiency and drug loading activities our results are compatible with similar reports in the literature (37, 38, 39).
Physicochemical properties of juglone loaded PLGA nanoparticles
Encapsulating efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) | Particle size (nm) | Zeta potential (mV) | Polydispersity index |
---|---|---|---|---|
29.95±2.8 | 15.42±2.1 | 213.33±5.2 | -14.58±2.8 | 0.115±0.03 |
JNPs had a narrow size distribution (Figure 2A), and were quite spherical, smooth, and homogeneous in size (Figure 2B SEM image).
Particle size distribution (A), scanning electron microscopy image (B), FT-IR spectra (C), and release pattern (D) of nanoparticles
Figure 2C compares the FT-IR absorbance spectra of free juglone, JNPs, and juglone-free PLGA nanoparticles. Juglone exhibited the main characteristic triple peaks at 1593 cm-1 (C2=C3), 1635 cm-1 (C4=O), and 1662 cm-1 (C1=O), while the peak at 1288 cm-1 corresponds to the C5-O group. Unlike juglone, both PLGA and JNPs have a carbonyl group absorbance band at 1751 cm-1. A comparison of all three spectra clearly shows a similarity between JNPs and PLGA, and the absence of juglone’s specific peak in the JNPs spectrum indicates that juglone was successfully coated with the PLGA nanoparticles.
Juglone cumulative release from the nanoparticles in phosphate buffer saline at pH 7.4 shows a triphasic pattern of up to 30 days (Figure 2D). It starts with 28.62±2.3 % at the end of the first hour, then soars to 56.53±2.5 % at the end of hour 24, and peaks to 88.86±2.8 % at the end of day 9. After that, it slows down to finally reach 92.72±4.1 % at the end of day 30.
Figure 3 shows the inhibitory effects of juglone and JNPs on L929 fibroblast cell viability (measured with the MTT assay). In the first 24 h, juglone and JNP had a similar cytotoxic effect, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 290 and 330 μmol/L, respectively (Figure 3A). After 48 h, free juglone toxicity became far more prominent, with IC50 of 60 μmol/L, as opposed to 270 μmol/L for JNPs (Figure 3B). Cell viability drastically dropped at juglone concentrations of 83 μmol/L (p=0.038), 160 μmol/L (p=0.013), and 250 μmol/L (p=0.034) compared to JNPs. In a study by Ramirez et al. (40), high cytotoxic activity of synthetic juglone and its derivatives on L929 fibroblast cells began at the lowest concentration (5.3 μmol/L) applied. Cytotoxic activity this high might be advantageous for cancer cell lines, but is unwelcome in other therapeutic applications. Significantly lower cytotoxic effect of JNPs is therefore an advantage here, most likely thanks to low and sustained release from the nanosystem. This is in line with reports that biodegradable nanoparticles used as drug carriers protect substances from degradation and reduce their toxicity or side effects (41).
Viability of L929 fibroblasts treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of quadruple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
Similar to the fibroblast cells, the cytotoxicity of either free or nano-encapsulated juglone in alfalfa cells was dose-dependent and was not significant at doses lower than 27 and 83 μmol/L, respectively. Similar was reported by other studies for alfalfa and other plants (42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47).
Free and nano-encapsulated juglone did not significantly differ in their effect on cell viability in the first 24 h either (Figure 4A), with respective IC50 of 316 and 382 μmol/L. After 48 h, however, free juglone doses of 5 and 27 μmol/L had a significantly higher cytotoxic effect (Figure 4B). The respective IC50 dropped to 2 μmol/L for juglone and 70 μmol/L for JNPs.
Viability of alfalfa cells treated with free and PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone (JNP) after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B); Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay. Values are expressed as means of triple samples with standard error. *statistically significant differences between juglone and JNP (p<0.05)
According to the spectrophotometric measurements and turbidimetric observation (OD600), the juglone dose of 10 μmol/L was selected as the highest non-cytotoxic concentration applied in the Ames test. Figures 5 and 6 show the results for
Potential mutagenicity in
Potential mutagenicity in
Our results indicate that juglone causes frameshift mutations which may be related to hydroxyl substitution. In the mutagenicity study carried out on natural quinones by Tikkaen et al. (48) hydrocarbons with simple hydroxyl and/or methyl substituents were extremely important for the mutagenic effect, and while juglone showed a mutagenic effect on the TA2637 strain with S9 metabolic activation, the effect was extremely weak in the TA98 strain. These results are consistent with our study. In another study (49), the mutagenic effect of juglone on
Our findings have confirmed both the mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of free juglone, reported in literature. Compared to free juglone, the toxicity of PLGA nanoparticle-coated juglone was reduced at low doses due to controlled release properties. Furthermore, the nanoparticle system showed no mutagenicity and improved the biocompatibility of juglone, retaining at the same time the beneficial action of natural juglone.
Our findings provide important information about possible applications of the investigated JNPs. Their IC50 values were significantly higher than the toxic dose for the mutant