Binocular Coordination in Reading When Changing Background Brightness

Brainard, D. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10 (4), 433-436.10.1163/156856897X00357Search in Google Scholar

Drewes, J., Masson, G. S., Montagnini, A. (2012). Shifts in reported gaze position due to changes in pupil size: Ground truth and compensation. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, Santa Barbara, California, 28-30 March 2012, pp. 209-212.10.1145/2168556.2168596Search in Google Scholar

Easa, H. K., Mantiuk, R. K., Lim, I. S. (2013). Evaluation of monocular depth cues on a high-dynamic-range display for visualization. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 2 (3), 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D., Girshick, A., Akeley, K., Banks, M. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vis., 8 (3), 1-30.10.1167/8.3.33287932618484839Search in Google Scholar

Hone, G. N., Davies, I. R. L. (1993). Brightness and depth on the flat screen: cue conflict in simulator displays. In: Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV. Proceedings of the Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, San Jose, CA, United States, 8 September 1993, pp. 518-528.Search in Google Scholar

Huestegge, L., K. H., Radach, R. (2010). Long-term effects of cannabis on eye movement control in reading. Psychopharmacology, 209 (1), pp. 77-84.10.1007/s00213-009-1769-z20091152Search in Google Scholar

Jaschinski, W., Heuer, H., Kylian, H. (1998). Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: A field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics, 41 (7), 1043-1049.10.1080/0014013981865869674376Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kirkby, J. A., Blythe, H. I., Drieghe, D., Benson, V., Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning. Behav. Res. Meth., 45 (3), pp. 664-678.10.3758/s13428-012-0301-223344736Search in Google Scholar

Liversedge, S., White, S., Findlay, J., Rayner, K. (2006). Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vis. Res., 46 (15), 2363-2374.10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.01316540142Search in Google Scholar

Nuthmann, A., Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. J. Vis., 9, 31.1-28.10.1167/9.5.3119757909Search in Google Scholar

Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, K., van de Weijer, J. (2013). The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eyetracking data quality. Behav. Res. Meth., 45 (1), 272-288.10.3758/s13428-012-0247-422956394Search in Google Scholar

Oetjen, S., Ziefle, M. (2007). The effects of LCD anisotropy on the visual performance of users of different ages. Human Factors, 49 (4), 619-627.10.1518/001872007X21569217702213Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Radach, R., Heller, D. (1999). Eye movements in reading: Are two eyes better than one? In: Becker, W., Deubel, H., Mergner, T. (eds). Current Oculomotor Research: Physiological and Psychological Aspects. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 341-348.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffel, F., Howland, H. (1995). Myopia. Vis. Res. Special Issue, 35, 1135-1358.Search in Google Scholar

Svede, A., Treija, E., Jaschinski, W., Krumina, G. (2015). Monocular and binocular calibrations in evaluating fixation disparity with a video-based eye-tracker. Perception, 44 (8-9), 1110-1128.Search in Google Scholar