[Brainard, D. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10 (4), 433-436.10.1163/156856897X00357]Search in Google Scholar
[Drewes, J., Masson, G. S., Montagnini, A. (2012). Shifts in reported gaze position due to changes in pupil size: Ground truth and compensation. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, Santa Barbara, California, 28-30 March 2012, pp. 209-212.10.1145/2168556.2168596]Search in Google Scholar
[Easa, H. K., Mantiuk, R. K., Lim, I. S. (2013). Evaluation of monocular depth cues on a high-dynamic-range display for visualization. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 2 (3), 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, D., Girshick, A., Akeley, K., Banks, M. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vis., 8 (3), 1-30.10.1167/8.3.33287932618484839]Search in Google Scholar
[Hone, G. N., Davies, I. R. L. (1993). Brightness and depth on the flat screen: cue conflict in simulator displays. In: Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV. Proceedings of the Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, San Jose, CA, United States, 8 September 1993, pp. 518-528.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huestegge, L., K. H., Radach, R. (2010). Long-term effects of cannabis on eye movement control in reading. Psychopharmacology, 209 (1), pp. 77-84.10.1007/s00213-009-1769-z20091152]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaschinski, W., Heuer, H., Kylian, H. (1998). Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: A field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics, 41 (7), 1043-1049.10.1080/0014013981865869674376]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kirkby, J. A., Blythe, H. I., Drieghe, D., Benson, V., Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning. Behav. Res. Meth., 45 (3), pp. 664-678.10.3758/s13428-012-0301-223344736]Search in Google Scholar
[Liversedge, S., White, S., Findlay, J., Rayner, K. (2006). Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vis. Res., 46 (15), 2363-2374.10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.01316540142]Search in Google Scholar
[Nuthmann, A., Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. J. Vis., 9, 31.1-28.10.1167/9.5.3119757909]Search in Google Scholar
[Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, K., van de Weijer, J. (2013). The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eyetracking data quality. Behav. Res. Meth., 45 (1), 272-288.10.3758/s13428-012-0247-422956394]Search in Google Scholar
[Oetjen, S., Ziefle, M. (2007). The effects of LCD anisotropy on the visual performance of users of different ages. Human Factors, 49 (4), 619-627.10.1518/001872007X21569217702213]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Radach, R., Heller, D. (1999). Eye movements in reading: Are two eyes better than one? In: Becker, W., Deubel, H., Mergner, T. (eds). Current Oculomotor Research: Physiological and Psychological Aspects. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 341-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffel, F., Howland, H. (1995). Myopia. Vis. Res. Special Issue, 35, 1135-1358.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svede, A., Treija, E., Jaschinski, W., Krumina, G. (2015). Monocular and binocular calibrations in evaluating fixation disparity with a video-based eye-tracker. Perception, 44 (8-9), 1110-1128.]Search in Google Scholar