Children’s Label-Learning Experience within Superordinate Categories Facilitates their Generalization of Labels for Additional Category Members

Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: The use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9(3), 200-204. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00038Search in Google Scholar

Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S.R. (2002). Word learning is “smart”: Evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words. Cognition, 84(1), B11-B22.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00015-XSearch in Google Scholar

Booth, A. E., Waxman, S. R., & Huang, Y. T. (2005). Conceptual information permeates word learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 491-505. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.491Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts. In N. Waterson, C. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 263-287). New York, NY: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1978). The Child as a Word Learner. In J. Bresnan, G. Miller, M. Halle (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 264-293.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language Conference, 15, 17-29.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554377Search in Google Scholar

Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2003). How specific is the shape bias? Child Development, 74(1), 168-178. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00528Search in Google Scholar

Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., & Bloom, P. (2003). Children's reliance on creator's intent in extending names for artifacts. Psychological Science, 14(2), 164-168. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01436Search in Google Scholar

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J.S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s Guide and Technical Manual. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (1988). Children's expectations concerning natural kind categories. Human Development, 31(1), 28-34. doi:10.1159/000273201Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categorization: The acquisition of natural kind terms. In S. A. Gelman, J. P. Byrnes, S. A. Gelman, J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 146-196). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511983689.006Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., & Gottfried, G. M. (1994). Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. In L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A.10.1017/CBO9780511752902.014Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 341-365). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752902.014Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994. tb00652.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14, 487-513. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00016-7Search in Google Scholar

Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Hahn, E. R. (2007). Fast mapping skills in the developing lexicon. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(3), 682-696. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/048)Search in Google Scholar

Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child Development, 75, 1098-1114.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00728.xSearch in Google Scholar

Graham, S. A., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (1999). Infants' reliance on shape to generalize novel labels to animate and inanimate objects. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 295-320. doi:10.1017/S0305000999003815Search in Google Scholar

Hupp, J. M. (2015). Development of the shape bias during the second year. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 176(2), 82-92. doi:10.1080/00221325.2015.1006563Search in Google Scholar

Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200.10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00784-6Search in Google Scholar

Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children’s theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45-75.10.1016/0885-2014(94)90019-1Search in Google Scholar

Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (1998). How children name objects with shoes. Cognitive Development, 13, 323-334.10.1016/S0885-2014(98)90014-4Search in Google Scholar

Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219-232.10.1111/1467-7687.00224Search in Google Scholar

Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Landau, B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 499-516.10.2307/1131126Search in Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman, L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752902.010Search in Google Scholar

Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1995). Principle-based inferences in young children’s categorization: Revisiting the impact of function on the naming of artifacts. Cognitive Development, 10, 347-380.10.1016/0885-2014(95)90002-0Search in Google Scholar

Landau, K.B., Smith, L.B., & Jones, S.S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7Search in Google Scholar

Lavin, T. A., & Hall, D. (2002). Domain effects in lexical development: Learning words for foods and toys. Cognitive Development, 16(4), 929-950. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00070-9Search in Google Scholar

Macario, J.F. (1991). Young children’s use of color in classification: foods and canonically colored objects. Cognitive Development, 6, 17-46.10.1016/0885-2014(91)90004-WSearch in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M., & McDonough, L. (1998). On developing a knowledge base in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1274-1288. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1274Search in Google Scholar

Markman, E. (1989). Categorization and naming in children (pp. 19- 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1991). The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In S. A. Gelman, J. P. Byrnes, S. A. Gelman, J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on Language and Thought: Interrelations in Development (pp. 72-106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mervis, C.B., & Bertrand, J. (1995). Early lexical acquisition and the vocabulary spurt: A response to Goldfield & Reznick. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 461-468.10.1017/S0305000900009880Search in Google Scholar

Mervis, C.B., & Bertrand, J. (1994). Acquisition of the Novel Name^Nameless Category (N3C) principle. Child Development, 65(6), 1646-1662.10.2307/1131285Search in Google Scholar

Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of a sow’s ears: young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 131, 5-15. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(1-2). doi:10.2307/1165788Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, N. (1980). Cognition to language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, E. E., & Kyger, M. (under review). Animals, foods, and household items‑oh my! Evidence of 24-30-month-old children’s increasing flexibility in word learning from naturalistic data. Submitted to Psychology of Language and Communication.Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, L., & Smith, L.B. (1999). Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax correspond? Cognition, 71, 1-33.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00034-7Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, L. K., & Horst, J. S. (2007). Dynamic noun generalization: moment-tomoment interactions shape children's naming biases. Infancy, 11(1), 97-110. doi:10.1207/s15327078in1101_5Search in Google Scholar

Samuelson, L. K., Horst, J. S., Schutte, A. R., & Dobbertin, B. N. (2008). Rigid thinking about deformables: Do children sometimes overgeneralize the shape bias?. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 559-589. doi:10.1017/S0305000908008672Search in Google Scholar

Sandhofer, C. M., Smith, L. B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning? Journal of Child Language, 27, 561-585.10.1017/S0305000900004256Search in Google Scholar

Sandhofer, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Learning adjectives in the real world: How learning nouns impedes learning adjectives. Language Learning and Development, 3(3), 233-267. doi:10.1080/15475440701360465Search in Google Scholar

Santos, L. R., Hauser, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Domain-specific knowledge in human children and nonhuman primates: Artifacts and foods. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, G. M. Burghardt, (Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 205-215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shutts, K., Markson, L., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). The developmental origins of animal and artifact concepts. In B. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 189-210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. B. (2000). Learning how to learn words: An associative crane. In R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-Pasek, L. Bloom, L. Smith, A. Woodward, N. Akhtar, M. Tomasello, G. Hollich, Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. B. (2001) How domain-general processes may create domain-specific biases. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (Eds.) Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620669.006Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. (2006). An attentional learning account of the shape bias: Reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1339-1343. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1339Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L.B., Jones, S.S., Landau, B, Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science. 13(1), 13-19.10.1111/1467-9280.00403Search in Google Scholar

Soja, N. (1992). Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perceptual properties and syntax. Cognitive Development, 7, 29-46.10.1016/0885-2014(92)90003-ASearch in Google Scholar

Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.S. (1991) Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179-211.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90051-5Search in Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, K., Landau, B., & Gelman, R. (1999). Shape, material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children's learning of novel words for objects and substances. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 249-281. doi:10.1080/016909699386301Search in Google Scholar

Tan, S. H., & Schafer, G. (2005). Toddlers' novel word learning: Effects of phonological representation, vocabulary size and parents' ostensive behaviour. First Language, 25(2), 131-155. doi:10.1177/0142723705050338Search in Google Scholar

Thom, E. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2009). More is more: The relationship between vocabulary size and word extension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(4), 466-473.10.1016/j.jecp.2009.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R. (1994). The development of an appreciation of specific linkages between linguistic and conception organization. In L. R. Gleitman, & B. L. Landau (Eds.). The acquisition of the lexicon (pp. 229-250). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, A. L., Markman, E. M., & Fitzsimmons, C. M. (1994). Rapid word learning in 13- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 30, 553-556.10.1037/0012-1649.30.4.553Search in Google Scholar