The influence of NANO-GRO^® organic stimulator on the yielding and fruit quality of field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Adani F., Genevini P., Zaccheo P., Zocchi G., 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 21(3): 561-575.10.1080/01904169809365424Search in Google Scholar

Ashraf M., Foolad M.R., 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59: 206-216.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Babik I., Panasiuk E., 2008. Evaluation of the usefulness the plant stimulator Nano-Gro^® in the field cultivation of vegetables (tomato, cucumber). Research Report No. 1 PW/2008. Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice.Search in Google Scholar

Basak A., 2008. Biostimulators, definitions, classification and legislation. In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. General Aspects. H. Gawrońska (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 7-17.Search in Google Scholar

Dobromilska R., Gubarewicz K., 2008. Influence of Bio-algeen S-90 on the yield and quality of small-sized tomato In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 150.Search in Google Scholar

Finnie J.F., Staden J., 1985. Effect of seaweed concentrate and applied hormones on in vitro cultured tomato roots. J. Plant Physiol. 120(3): 215-222.10.1016/S0176-1617(85)80108-5Search in Google Scholar

Gajc-Wolska J., Łyszkowska M., Zielony T., 2010. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on the yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato cv. (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in the field. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 72: 63-70.10.2478/v10032-010-0006-ySearch in Google Scholar

Gajc-Wolska J., Radzanowska J., Łyszkowska M., 2009. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on physical and sensorial traits of greenhouse tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in field production. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8(3): 37-43.Search in Google Scholar

Gorczyca A., Kasprowicz M., 2011. Initial research on the effect of the NanoGro plant growth stimulator on Fusarium culmorum (W.G. Smith) Sacc. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 18(12): 1625-1631.Search in Google Scholar

Hernández-Herrera R.M., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F., Ruiz-López M.A., Norrie J., Hernández-Carmona G., 2014. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 26: 619-628.10.1007/s10811-013-0078-4Search in Google Scholar

Janas R., 2012. The influence of biological compounds with different mechanism of action on the metabolism of plants and seed quality of garden rocket. Biul. IHAR 262: 197-206.Search in Google Scholar

Jankowski K., Deska J., Truba I., Jankowska J., 2013. Impact on Nano-Gro stimulator on the seeds germination and growth kinetics of seedlings of selected grass and legumes species. ENVIRON 24,1(55): 23-26.10.2478/oszn-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

Jędrszczyk E., Skowera B., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., 2012. The influence of weather conditions during vegetation period on yielding of twelve determinate tomato cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40(2): 203-209.10.15835/nbha4028252Search in Google Scholar

Kirichenko E.B., Yamskov I.A., Kurilov D.V., 2009. New nanobioregulator of plant growth NANO-Stim: physiological activity and field application. Proc. 2^nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 470-471.Search in Google Scholar

Kocira A., Kornas R., Kocira S., 2013. Effects assessment of Klepak SL on the bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 14(2): 545-554.10.5513/JCEA01/14.2.1234Search in Google Scholar

Kocira A., Kocira S., Złotek U., Kornas R., Świeca M., 2015. Effect of Nano-Gro preparation applications on yield components and antioxidant properties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Fresen. Environ. Bull. 24-11b: 4034-4041.Search in Google Scholar

Mäkelä P., Jokinen K., Kontturi M., Peltonen-Sainio P., Pehu E., Somersalo S., 1998. Foliar application of glycinebetaine – a novel product from sugar beet – as an approach to increase tomato yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 7: 139-148.10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00042-3Search in Google Scholar

Mäkelä P., Kärkkäinen J., Somersalo S., 2000. Effect of glycinebetaine on chloroplast ultrastructure, chlorophyll and protein content, and RuBPCO activities in tomato grown under drought or salinity. Biol. Plantarum 43(3): 471-475.10.1023/A:1026712426180Search in Google Scholar

Matysiak K., Adamczewski K., 2009. Plant growth regulators application – studies in Poland and in the world Prog. Plant Prot. 49(4): 1810-1816.Search in Google Scholar

Matysiak K., Kaczmarek S., Krawczyk R., 2011. Influence of sea weed extracts and mixture of humic and fulvic acids on germination and growth of Zea mays L. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 10(1): 33-45.Search in Google Scholar

Michalski T., 2010. Development and yielding of grain maize treated with Biochikol 020 PC, in comparison with crops dressed with Vitavax 200 WS and a control without any dressing. J. Res. App. Agr. Eng. 55(4): 33-35.Search in Google Scholar

Mila A., Dobromilska R., 2013. Effect of bioproducts based on sea algae on biometric features of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants in seedling stage. Episteme 18(2): 303-310.Search in Google Scholar

Nagata M., Yamashita I., 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 39(10): 925-928.10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925Search in Google Scholar

Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Schiavon M., Ertani A., 2016. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73(1): 18-23.10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Nowicka-Połeć A., Kunicki E., 2013. The influence of physioactivators on broad bean (Vicia faba var. major yield and its quality. Proc. Conf. Sustainable production of vegetable and medicinal plants, 20-21 June, Warsaw, Poland: 67.Search in Google Scholar

Skowera B., Jędrszczyk E., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., Kołton A., 2014. The effects of hydrothermal conditions during vegetation period on fruit quality of processing tomatoes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23 (1): 195-202.Search in Google Scholar

Skórska E., 2011. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cucumis sativus and Mentha piperita leaves exposed to short-term UV-B radiation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 53(1): 16-19.10.2478/v10182-011-0002-7Search in Google Scholar

Skórska E., 2008. Does the Nano-Gro® biostimulator increase tolerance on Tytus F₁ cucumber plants in early growth phase to ultraviolet-B radiation? In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 44-51.Search in Google Scholar

Smirnova I.M., Enina O.L., Orekhova A.N., Olekhnovich L.S., Kirichenko E.B., 2009. Physiological activity of nanoregulator of plant growth Nano-Gro: Wheat caryophysis formation and germination activity, ryzogenesis of cutting of ornamental plants. Proc. 2^nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 834.Search in Google Scholar

Yemm E.W., Wills A.J., 1954 The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57(3): 508–514.10.1042/bj0570508126978913181867Search in Google Scholar