[Adani F., Genevini P., Zaccheo P., Zocchi G., 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 21(3): 561-575.10.1080/01904169809365424]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashraf M., Foolad M.R., 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59: 206-216.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Babik I., Panasiuk E., 2008. Evaluation of the usefulness the plant stimulator Nano-Gro® in the field cultivation of vegetables (tomato, cucumber). Research Report No. 1 PW/2008. Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice.]Search in Google Scholar
[Basak A., 2008. Biostimulators, definitions, classification and legislation. In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. General Aspects. H. Gawrońska (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 7-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobromilska R., Gubarewicz K., 2008. Influence of Bio-algeen S-90 on the yield and quality of small-sized tomato In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finnie J.F., Staden J., 1985. Effect of seaweed concentrate and applied hormones on in vitro cultured tomato roots. J. Plant Physiol. 120(3): 215-222.10.1016/S0176-1617(85)80108-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajc-Wolska J., Łyszkowska M., Zielony T., 2010. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on the yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato cv. (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in the field. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 72: 63-70.10.2478/v10032-010-0006-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajc-Wolska J., Radzanowska J., Łyszkowska M., 2009. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on physical and sensorial traits of greenhouse tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in field production. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8(3): 37-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gorczyca A., Kasprowicz M., 2011. Initial research on the effect of the NanoGro plant growth stimulator on Fusarium culmorum (W.G. Smith) Sacc. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 18(12): 1625-1631.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández-Herrera R.M., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F., Ruiz-López M.A., Norrie J., Hernández-Carmona G., 2014. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 26: 619-628.10.1007/s10811-013-0078-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Janas R., 2012. The influence of biological compounds with different mechanism of action on the metabolism of plants and seed quality of garden rocket. Biul. IHAR 262: 197-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jankowski K., Deska J., Truba I., Jankowska J., 2013. Impact on Nano-Gro stimulator on the seeds germination and growth kinetics of seedlings of selected grass and legumes species. ENVIRON 24,1(55): 23-26.10.2478/oszn-2013-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Jędrszczyk E., Skowera B., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., 2012. The influence of weather conditions during vegetation period on yielding of twelve determinate tomato cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40(2): 203-209.10.15835/nbha4028252]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirichenko E.B., Yamskov I.A., Kurilov D.V., 2009. New nanobioregulator of plant growth NANO-Stim: physiological activity and field application. Proc. 2nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 470-471.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kocira A., Kornas R., Kocira S., 2013. Effects assessment of Klepak SL on the bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 14(2): 545-554.10.5513/JCEA01/14.2.1234]Search in Google Scholar
[Kocira A., Kocira S., Złotek U., Kornas R., Świeca M., 2015. Effect of Nano-Gro preparation applications on yield components and antioxidant properties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Fresen. Environ. Bull. 24-11b: 4034-4041.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäkelä P., Jokinen K., Kontturi M., Peltonen-Sainio P., Pehu E., Somersalo S., 1998. Foliar application of glycinebetaine – a novel product from sugar beet – as an approach to increase tomato yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 7: 139-148.10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00042-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäkelä P., Kärkkäinen J., Somersalo S., 2000. Effect of glycinebetaine on chloroplast ultrastructure, chlorophyll and protein content, and RuBPCO activities in tomato grown under drought or salinity. Biol. Plantarum 43(3): 471-475.10.1023/A:1026712426180]Search in Google Scholar
[Matysiak K., Adamczewski K., 2009. Plant growth regulators application – studies in Poland and in the world Prog. Plant Prot. 49(4): 1810-1816.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matysiak K., Kaczmarek S., Krawczyk R., 2011. Influence of sea weed extracts and mixture of humic and fulvic acids on germination and growth of Zea mays L. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 10(1): 33-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalski T., 2010. Development and yielding of grain maize treated with Biochikol 020 PC, in comparison with crops dressed with Vitavax 200 WS and a control without any dressing. J. Res. App. Agr. Eng. 55(4): 33-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mila A., Dobromilska R., 2013. Effect of bioproducts based on sea algae on biometric features of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants in seedling stage. Episteme 18(2): 303-310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nagata M., Yamashita I., 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 39(10): 925-928.10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925]Search in Google Scholar
[Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Schiavon M., Ertani A., 2016. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73(1): 18-23.10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowicka-Połeć A., Kunicki E., 2013. The influence of physioactivators on broad bean (Vicia faba var. major yield and its quality. Proc. Conf. Sustainable production of vegetable and medicinal plants, 20-21 June, Warsaw, Poland: 67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skowera B., Jędrszczyk E., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., Kołton A., 2014. The effects of hydrothermal conditions during vegetation period on fruit quality of processing tomatoes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23 (1): 195-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skórska E., 2011. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cucumis sativus and Mentha piperita leaves exposed to short-term UV-B radiation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 53(1): 16-19.10.2478/v10182-011-0002-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Skórska E., 2008. Does the Nano-Gro® biostimulator increase tolerance on Tytus F1 cucumber plants in early growth phase to ultraviolet-B radiation? In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 44-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smirnova I.M., Enina O.L., Orekhova A.N., Olekhnovich L.S., Kirichenko E.B., 2009. Physiological activity of nanoregulator of plant growth Nano-Gro: Wheat caryophysis formation and germination activity, ryzogenesis of cutting of ornamental plants. Proc. 2nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 834.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yemm E.W., Wills A.J., 1954 The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57(3): 508–514.10.1042/bj0570508126978913181867]Search in Google Scholar