<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The mainly arctic-alpine genus <italic>Draba</italic> is well known for its complex morphological and chromosomal vanation. This paper reviews a larger study of Nordic <italic>Draba,</italic> aimed to provide insights into evolutionary processes that confound taxonomic relationships in the genus. The populations analyzed were referred to 16 currently recognized species of the sections <italic>Draba</italic> (petals white), <italic>Chrysodraba</italic> (petals yellow), <italic>andDrabella</italic> (petals yellow), and investigated using enzyme electrophoresis, restriction site analysis of cpDNA and rDNA, and analysis of chromosome numbers, artificial and natural hybrids, reproductive biology, habitat differentiation, and morphology.Section <italic>Draba</italic> comprises three diploids and seven polyploids (4x-10x) based on x = 8, sect. <italic>Chrysodraba</italic> comprises five polyploids (4x-16x) based on x = 8, and sect. <italic>Drabella</italic> comprises <italic>D. crassifolia,</italic> which probably is octoploid based on x = 5. Artificial F1 hybrids were obtained in 19 interspecific combinations. Later-generation hybrids were obtained in seven of these combinations. The genetic data suggest that 1) all polyploids are genetic allopolyploids, i.e., they show disomic inheritance and are highly fixed-heterozygous; 2) several of the polyploids have originated recurrently, some of them even polyphyletically; 3) some of the alloploid populations may have originated from cross-incompatible, sibling species that all belong to a single diploid taxonomic species; 4) interspecific gene flow across chromosome number barriers is possible and probably occurs in natural situations; 5) each of three of the polyploids represents an independent alloploid lineage, whereas sect. <italic>Draba</italic> and two species of sect. <italic>Chrysodraba</italic> form an intricate phylogenetic network; 6) some of the polyploids have originated locally, others have migrated repeatedly into the Nordic area; and 7) the phenotypic expression of genes encoding taxonomically important morphological characters does not follow consistent patterns in hybrids; this result may explain the discrepancies between genetic and taxonomic relationships in this highly reticulate genus.All species are sexual autogams, but there was large variation in autogamous seed set and traits promoting cross-pollination. The diploids are genetically depauperate, extremely inbreeding stress-tolerators occupying restricted ecological niches, whereas most of the polyploids have high levels of genetic variation, occupy a wide range of niches, and are either stress-tolerant competitors with a mixed mating system or primarily inbreeding ruderals. Mixed mating appears advantageous in the polyploids occurring in competitive habitats, although their fixed heterozygosity buffers the effect of selfing with respect to loss of variability. The ecological amplitude, heterozygosity, and biochemical diversity in the species were positively correlated and increased significantly with ploidal level. Two hypotheses are advanced to explain these correlations: 1) the general-purpose genotype hypothesis, which suggests that a high level of fixed heterozygosity in an allopolyploid genotype <italic>per se</italic> allows for exploitation of several different niches; and 2) the special-purpose genotype hypothesis, which suggests that repeated alloploidizations involving genetically divergent progenitors result in different fixed-heterozygous genotypes, each of which may exploit a particular niche.The evidence for multiple polyploid origins, differentiation into sibling diploids, and interploidal gene flow · in <italic>Draba</italic> add to a growing data base suggesting that polyploid complexes represent considerably more dynamic genetic systems than previously envisioned. In <italic>Draba,</italic> the principal evolutionary importance of these processes is probably that they serve as escapes from genetic and ecological depauperation caused by uniparental inbreeding at the diploid level. These processes inevitably result, however, in incongruities between taxonomic and evolutionary entities in the genus, supporting the use of a wide species concept.</abstract>

Polyploid evolution in arctic-alpine <italic>Draba</italic> (Brassicaceae)

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 40 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 39 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Volume 38 (2018): Issue 1 (October 2018)

Volume 37 (2014): Issue 1 (April 2014) Multiple parallel ordinations: the importance of choice of ordination method and weighting of species abundance data, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 36 (2013): Issue 1 (April 2013) A strict maximum likelihood explanation of MaxEnt, and some implications for distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 35 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012) A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling, Editor: Vegar Bakkestuen

Volume 34 (2010): Issue 1 (April 2010) Vegetation composition, gradients and environment relationships of birch forest in six reference areas in Norway,
Editor: R. H. Økland

Volume 33 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009) The lichen flora of Svalbard, Editor: R. H. Økland

Volume 32 (2008): Issue 1 (November 2008) Gradients analyses of forests ground vegetation and its relationships to environmental variables in five subtropical forest areas, S and SW China,
Editors: K. Høiland and R. H. Økland

Volume 31 (2008): Issue 1 (February 2008) Arctic and alpine mycology VII, Editors: K. Høiland and R. H. Økland

Volume 29 (2001): Issue 1 (January 2001)

Volume 28 (2000): Issue 1 (January 2000)

Volume 27 (1999): Issue 1 (January 1999)

Volume 26 (1999): Issue 1 (January 1999)

Volume 25 (1998): Issue 1 (December 1998)

Volume 24 (1997): Issue 1 (December 1997)

Volume 23 (1996): Issue 1 (June 1996)

Volume 22 (1996): Issue 1 (May 1996)

Volume 21 (1994): Issue 1 (May 1994)

Volume 20 (1993): Issue 1 (November 1993)

Volume 19 (1993): Issue 1 (November 1993)

Volume 18 (1993): Issue 1 (September 1993)

Volume 17 (1993): Issue 1 (May 1993)

Volume 16 (1993): Issue 1 (March 1993)

Volume 15 (1993): Issue 1 (March 1993)

Volume 14 (1992): Issue 1 (May 1992)

Volume 13 (1992): Issue 1 (February 1992)

Volume 12 (1991): Issue 1 (June 1991)

Volume 11 (1990): Issue 1 (December 1990)

Volume 10 (1990): Issue 1 (June 1990)

Volume 9 (1989): Issue 1 (October 1989)

Volume 8 (1989): Issue 1 (October 1989)

Volume 7 (1988): Issue 1 (March 1988)

Volume 6 (1987): Issue 1 (June 1987)

Volume 6 (1995): Issue s6 (January 1995) Supplement 6

Volume 5 (2004): Issue s5 (January 2004) Supplement 5

Volume 5 (1987): Issue 1 (May 1987)

Volume 4 (1986): Issue 1 (December 1986)

Volume 4 (1992): Issue s4 (January 1992) Supplement 4

Volume 3 (1986): Issue 1 (February 1986)

Volume 3 (1991): Issue s3 (January 1991) Supplement 3

Volume 2 (1990): Issue s2 (January 1990) Supplement 2

Volume 2 (1985): Issue 1 (November 1985)

Volume 1 (1985): Issue 1 (January 1985)

Volume 1 (1990): Issue s1 (January 1990) Supplement 1

Sommerfeltia

 Contains monographs in plant taxonomy, phytogeography, plant ecology, plant morphology, evolutionary botany. Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Volume 4 (1992): Issue s4 (January 1992) - Supplement 4

Supplement 4

Volume 4 (1992): Issue s4 (January 1992)

Sommerfeltia

Volume 4 (1992): Issue s4 (January 1992)

Supplement 4

Polyploid evolution in arctic-alpine Draba (Brassicaceae)

Search

All Volumes and Issues in this Journal