<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Late Devonian coarse-grained carbonate deposits in the Holy Cross Mountains were studied for possible storm depositional systems and catastrophic tsunami events, as it must be assumed that the investigated area was strongly affected by tropical hurricanes generated in the open ocean North of Gondwana. This assumption appears consistent with diagnostic features of carbonate tempestites at several places in the Holy Cross Mountains. Sedimentary structures and textures that indicate so are, among other evidence, erosional bases with sole marks, graded units, intra- and bioclasts, different laminations and burrowing at the tops of tempestite layers. It has been suggested before that a tsunami occurred during the Late Devonian, but the Laurussian shelf had an extensional regime at the time, which excludes intensive seismic activity. The shelf environment also excluded the generation of tsunami waves because the depth was too shallow. Additionally, the Holy Cross Mountains region was surrounded in the Devonian by shallow-marine and stable elevated areas: the Nida Platform, the Opatkowice Platform and the Cracow Platform to the South, and the elevated Lublin-Lviv area to the NE. Thus, tsunami energy should have been absorbed by these regions if tsunamites would have occurred.</abstract>

The palaeogeographical background of Late Devonian storm events in the western part of the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland)

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The Pelotas Basin, located on the SE Brazilian shelf, has evolved since the Aptian. Stratigraphical data from the basin can be used for delineation of the unconformity-bounded units (synthems) on the shelf, which is a first step towards a full understanding of its stratigraphic architecture, evolution, and hydrocarbon potential. Hiatuses in the Cenozoic succession of the Pelotas Basin are established with both biostratigraphic (planktonic foraminifers and calcareous nannofossils) and isotopic (87Sr/86Sr) data. The seven recognised hiatuses are dated respectively as (1) Palaeocene (Danian- Thanetian), (2) Palaeocene/Eocene boundary (Thanetian-Ypresian), (3) Eocene (Ypresian-Lutetian), (4) Eocene-Oligocene (Lutetian-Rupelian), (5) early-late Oligocene (Rupelian-Chattian), (6) early Miocene (Aquitanian-Burdigalian), and (7) middle-late Miocene (Serravallian-Tortonian). These intervals between the hiatuses are correlated with those of the Santos and Campos Basins north from the Pelotas Basin. The breaks in sedimentation that these basins have in common occurred (1) at the Palaeocene-Eocene and (2) Eocene-Oligocene transitions, (3) in the early Miocene, and (4) in the middle-late Miocene. These main unconformities outline five synthems on the SE Brazilian shelf, viz. the SEBS-1 (Palaeocene), SEBS-2 (Eocene), SEBS-3 (Oligocene), SEBS-4 (early-middle Miocene) and SEBS-5 (late Miocene-Holocene). The above unconformities are correlated with those established in the Cenozoic sedimentary successions of different regions such as Western Siberia, Arabia, NW and NE Africa, peninsular India, S Australia, the Gulf of Mexico, NW Europe, and South Africa. The only regional unconformity, near the Oligocene/Miocene boundary, coincides with the nearly-global sedimentation break. The latter was resulted from a climatic event, i.e., the ‘Mi-1 glaciation’. Thus, a eustatic origin is supposed for this regional unconformity. The other regional unconformities also correspond to global sea-level falls (probably with an exception for the Palaeocene/Eocene surface), which suggests that global eustatic movements controlled the development of the regional synthem architecture.</abstract>

PETROBRAS/CENPES/PDGEO/BPA, Av. Horácio Macedo, 950, prédio 20, 1100, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, 21941–915 Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brazil

Department of Mineralogy and Petrography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-na-Donu, 344090, Russia

International Agency for Minerals Policy (’MinPol’), Austria

Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro ICC – Ala Central, Caixa Postal 0446, 70910–900 Brasília DF, Brazil

PETROBRAS/RH/UP/ECTEP/PCGEO, Rua Ulysses Guimarães 565, 20211–225 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Cenozoic synthem stratigraphic architecture of the SE Brazilian shelf and its global eustatic context: evidence from the Pelotas Basin (offshore Brazil)

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Four bryozoan species are described from the upper member (Shishtu II) (Visean, Early Carboniferous=Mississippian) of the Shishtu Formation of central Iran: Nikiforovella ulbensis Nekhoroshev, 1956, Nicklesopora elegantulaformis (Nekhoroshev, 1956), Primorella cf. iranica Gorjunova, 2006, and Nikiforopora intermedia (Nikiforova, 1950). This Visean assemblage shows close palaeogeographical affinities of Iran with Kazakhstan and Russia (eastern Transbaikalia, Kurgan region).</abstract>

Kuban State University, 353235, Aphipskij, post box 30, Russia

NIOC Exploration Directorate, Seoul Str., 1994814695, Tehran, Iran

Early Visean bryozoans from the Shishtu II Member, Shishtu Formation, central Iran

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Hydrothermal alteration of the Meiduk porphyry copper deposit, south of the Kerman Cenozoic magmatic arc and southeast of the central Iranian volcano-plutonic belt has resulted in three stages of mineralisation characterised by veins and veinlets. These are, from early to late: (1) quartz + K-feldspar + biotite + pyrite ± chalcopyrite ± pyrrhotite ± magnetite (early potassic alteration and type-A veins); (2) quartz + chalcopyrite + pyrite + bornite + pyrrhotite + K- -feldspar + biotite + magnetite (potassic-sericitic alteration and type-B veins); and (3) quartz + pyrite + chalcopyrite + sericite (sericitic alteration and type-C veins). Most ores were formed during stages 2 and 3. Three main types of fluid inclusions are distinguished based on petrographical, microthermometrical and laser Raman spectroscopy analyses, i.e. type I (three-phase aqueous inclusions), type II (three-phase liquid-carbonic inclusions) and type III (multi-phase solid inclusions). The fluid inclusions in quartz veins of the stages are mainly homogenised at 340-530°C (stage 1), 270-385°C (stage 2) and 214-350°C (stage 3), respectively, with salinities of 3.1-16 wt.% NaCl equivalent, 2.2-43 wt.% NaCl equivalent and 8.2-22.8 wt.% NaCl equivalent, respectively. The estimated trapping pressures are 97.9-123.6 MPa (3.7-4.6 km) in stage 1 and 62.5-86.1 MPa (2.3-3.1 km) in stage 2, respectively. These fluid inclusions are homogenised in different ways at similar temperatures, suggesting that fluid boiling took place in stages 2 and 3. The fluid system evolved from high-temperature, medium-salinity, high-pressure and CO2-rich to low-temperature, low-pressure, high-salinity and CO2-poor, with fluid boiling being the dominating mechanism, followed by input of meteoric water. CO2 escape may have been a factor in increasing activities of NaCl and S2- in the fluids, diminishing the oxidation of the fluids from stage 1 to 3. The result was precipitation of sulphides and trapping of multi-phase solid inclusions in hydrothermal quartz veins.</abstract>

Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

National Iranian Copper Industries Company (NICICo.), Sarcheshmeh, Iran

First report on the occurrence of CO2-bearing fluid inclusions in the Meiduk porphyry copper deposit, Iran: implications for mineralisation processes in a continental collision setting

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Megaclasts are sedimentary particles larger than boulders. Their huge size and scattered occurrence make them objects that deserve geological heritage, requiring conservation. Investigation of megaclasts for the purpose faces difficulties because of the distinction between boulders and megaclasts. Local study of Quaternary large stones in Mountainous Adygeja (W Caucasus, SW Russia) suggests ~ 2 m as a suitable size criterion, although only locally. Shape, occurrence, and origin of megaclasts require additional attention. Geoconservation may result in anthropogenic disturbances of the natural landscape through removal of vegetation, access constructions, and restoration. The geotourism potential of megaclasts is partly determined by their huge size and their rare and scattered occurrence. Aesthetic qualities, local legends, and co-occurrence with prehistoric megalithic constructions increase this potential. The Maiden’s Stone in Mountainous Adygeja, which is ~ 35 m long, has been a tourist attraction already for decades. It is an impressive example of geoconconservation and geotourism connected with megaclasts. Generally, megaclasts increase the value (including the scientific importance) of the geological heritage of Mountainous Adygeja, where a geopark might be established.</abstract>

Department of Physical Geography, Ecology, and Nature Protection, Institute of Earth Sciences, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-na-Donu, 344090, Russia

Camp for Practice and Educational Tourism ’Belaja Retchka’ (’White River’), Southern Federal University, Nikel’, Majkop District, Republic of Adygeja, 385792, Russia

Department of Mineralogy and Petrography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-na-Donu, 344090, Russia; postal address: P.O. Box 7333, Rostov-na-Donu, 344056, Russia

Chair of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics, Department of Mineral Resources and Petroleum Engineering, University of Leoben, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria

Megaclasts in geoconservation: sedimentological questions, anthropogenic influence, and geotourism potential

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 29 (2023): Issue 3 (December 2023)

Volume 29 (2023): Issue 2 (August 2023)

Volume 29 (2023): Issue 1 (April 2023)

Volume 28 (2022): Issue 3 (December 2022)

Volume 28 (2022): Issue 2 (August 2022)

Volume 28 (2022): Issue 1 (April 2022)

Volume 27 (2021): Issue 3 (December 2021)

Volume 27 (2021): Issue 2 (August 2021)

Volume 27 (2021): Issue 1 (April 2021)

Volume 26 (2020): Issue 3 (December 2020)

Volume 26 (2020): Issue 2 (August 2020)

Volume 26 (2020): Issue 1 (April 2020)

Volume 25 (2019): Issue 3 (December 2019)

Volume 25 (2019): Issue 2 (August 2019)

Volume 25 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)

Volume 24 (2018): Issue 3 (December 2018)

Volume 24 (2018): Issue 2 (August 2018)

Volume 24 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 23 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 23 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 23 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 22 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 22 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 22 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 21 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 21 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 21 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 21 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 20 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 20 (2014): Issue 3 (October 2014)

Volume 20 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 20 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 19 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 19 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 19 (2013): Issue 1-2 (May 2013) Heavy-mineral analysis as a tool in earth-scientific research

Volume 18 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 18 (2012): Issue 3 (November 2012)

Volume 18 (2012): Issue 2 (August 2012)

Volume 18 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)

Volume 17 (2011): Issue 4 (December 2011)

Volume 17 (2011): Issue 3 (September 2011)

Volume 17 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)

Volume 17 (2011): Issue 1 (April 2011)

Volume 16 (2010): Issue 4 (December 2010)

Volume 16 (2010): Issue 3 (October 2010)

Volume 16 (2010): Issue 2 (June 2010)

Volume 16 (2010): Issue 1 (April 2010)

Volume 15 (2009): Issue 3-4 (December 2009)

Geologos

GEOLOGOS is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing research results and review articles covering all earth-science disciplines, with a focus on the geology of central and eastern Europe. Studies on areas of poorly known geology (e.g. Asia and Africa) are also published. Articles from non-European areas should be universal and problem-related, while purely regional issues are avoided.  Over the last years, Geologos has published studies on many topics, including:    mineralogy and geochemistry  sedimentology (siliciclastics and carbonates, sedimentary structures, facies analysis)  palaeontology (invertebrate palaeontology, trace fossils, micropalaeontology)  stratigraphy and petroleum geology (sequence stratigraphy)  glacial geology (Pleistocene palaeogeography and stratigraphy, lithology of glaciogenic deposits)  hydrogeology (groundwater circulation, groundwater flow models, drainage systems, deep aquifers)  meteorites (Morasko meteorite fall).    GEOLOGOS has been issued since 1995 as the journal of the Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University (AMU) in Poznań, Poland.  GEOLOGOS is an open access journal; all content is freely available without charge.  Three issues of GEOLOGOS are published each year. Electronic versions of all papers are published on the Sciendo platform.  Why subscribe and read    Journal on geology of Central and Eastern Europe as well as other areas of poorly known geology   Why submit    Quick publication, colour pages free of chargé. To publish in GEOLOGOS, authors are not required to pay an Article Processing Charge.   Reviewing    Each manuscript, as a rule, is reviewed by two referees, commonly one Polish and one foreign. Reviews are double-blind.   Rejection Rate    About 40%    Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Geologos

Volume 19 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

The palaeogeographical background of Late Devonian storm events in the western part of the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland)

Cenozoic synthem stratigraphic architecture of the SE Brazilian shelf and its global eustatic context: evidence from the Pelotas Basin (offshore Brazil)

Early Visean bryozoans from the Shishtu II Member, Shishtu Formation, central Iran

First report on the occurrence of CO₂-bearing fluid inclusions in the Meiduk porphyry copper deposit, Iran: implications for mineralisation processes in a continental collision setting

Megaclasts in geoconservation: sedimentological questions, anthropogenic influence, and geotourism potential

Chercher

Tous les volumes et éditions dans cette revue