Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Materials Science-Poland
Édition 40 (2022): Edition 3 (September 2022)
Accès libre
Application possibilities of scanning acoustic microscopy in the assessment of explosive welding
Marcin Korzeniowski
Marcin Korzeniowski
,
Beata Białobrzeska
Beata Białobrzeska
et
Anna Lewandowska
Anna Lewandowska
| 31 déc. 2022
Materials Science-Poland
Édition 40 (2022): Edition 3 (September 2022)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
31 déc. 2022
Pages:
93 - 111
Reçu:
13 déc. 2022
Accepté:
21 déc. 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2022-0035
Mots clés
non-destructive testing
,
scanning acoustic microscopy
,
cladding
,
explosive welding
,
metallography
© 2022 Marcin Korzeniowski et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Structure of analysed materials: (A) steel P355NH, visible ferrite and pearlite bands; (B) steel grade D, visible ferrite and pearlite grains, pearlite locally shows a slight banding; (C) steel SAF 250, visible austenite islands in a ferritic matrix; (D) Inconel 625, visible austenite grains with twinning boundaries; (E) Al 1050, dark inclusions; (F) Al 5083, state after plastic deformation and annealing. Visible solution α grains and Al (Mn, Fe, Si) inclusions, inter-metallic phases of Al3Mg2 and texture of deformation and (G) titanium grade 1, visible grains with twinning boundaries. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 2
Microstructure of bimetal SAF 2504 – P355NH: (A) 100× magnification; (B) 200× magnification; and (C) 500× magnification. Etched state, light microscopy, (D) 500× magnification
Fig. 3
Results of SAM C-scan ultrasonic tests, SAF 2504 – P355NH joints: (A) threshold 45% of reference range; (B) threshold 65% of reference range and (C) threshold 85% of reference range
Fig. 4
Results of ultrasonic tests of SAF 2504 – P355NH joint: (1) surface 0.63 mm2, (2) surface 0.14 mm2, (3) surface 0.11 mm2 and (4) surface 0.23 mm2
Fig. 5
C-scan and B-scan acoustic cross-sections of SAF 2504 – P355NH bimetal for two selected scanning lines: (A) cross section A-A and (B) cross section B-B
Fig. 6
X-scan presentations of SAF 2504 – P355NH joint: (A) C-scan registered in 2.9–3.00 mm range; (B) depth 2.94 mm; (C) depth 2.95 mm; (D) depth 2.96 mm; (E) depth 2.97 mm and (F) depth 2.98 mm
Fig. 7
Microstructure of Inconel 625 – P355NH bimetal: (A) magnification 100×; (B) magnification 100×; and (C) magnification 200×. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 8
Results of C-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of the Inconel 625 – P355NH joint. Close-ups of particular indications: (1) surface 0.03 mm2; (2) surface 0.09 mm2; (3) surface 0.05 mm2 and (4) surface 0.06 mm2, scanning acoustic microscope
Fig. 9
C-scan and B-scan acoustic cross-sections of Inconel 625 – P355NH bimetal for two selected scanning lines: (A) cross section A–A and (B) cross section B–B
Fig. 10
X-scan presentations of Inconel 625 – P355NH joint: (A) C-scan registered in the range of 3.01–3.06 mm; (B) depth 3.01 mm; (C) depth 3.02 mm; (D) depth 3.04 mm; (E) depth 3.05 mm and (F) depth 3.06 mm
Fig. 11
Microstructure of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083: (A) steel grade D – Ti grade 1, magnification 100×; (B) steel grade D – Ti grade 1, magnification 200×; (C) Ti grade 1 – Al 1050, magnification 100×; (D) Ti grade 1 – Al 1050, magnification 500×; (E) Al 1050 – Al 5083, magnification 100× and (F) Al 1050 – Al 5083, magnification 500×. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 12
Results of C-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083. Close-ups of particular indications: (1) surface 0.44 mm2, (2) surface 1.51 mm2, (3) surface 0.27 mm2 and (4) surface 0.52 mm2
Fig. 13
Results of C-scan and B-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083 for two selected scanning lines (in both cases steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 are visible): (A) cross section A–A and (B) cross section B–B
Fig. 14
A four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083, X-scan: (A) depth 11.90 mm, (B) depth 11.91 mm, (C) depth 11.92 mm, (D) depth 11.93 mm, (E) depth 11.94 mm and (F) depth 11.95 mm, scanning acoustic microscope
Aperçu