Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Materials Science-Poland
Band 40 (2022): Heft 3 (September 2022)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
Application possibilities of scanning acoustic microscopy in the assessment of explosive welding
Marcin Korzeniowski
Marcin Korzeniowski
,
Beata Białobrzeska
Beata Białobrzeska
und
Anna Lewandowska
Anna Lewandowska
| 31. Dez. 2022
Materials Science-Poland
Band 40 (2022): Heft 3 (September 2022)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
31. Dez. 2022
Seitenbereich:
93 - 111
Eingereicht:
13. Dez. 2022
Akzeptiert:
21. Dez. 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2022-0035
Schlüsselwörter
non-destructive testing
,
scanning acoustic microscopy
,
cladding
,
explosive welding
,
metallography
© 2022 Marcin Korzeniowski et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Structure of analysed materials: (A) steel P355NH, visible ferrite and pearlite bands; (B) steel grade D, visible ferrite and pearlite grains, pearlite locally shows a slight banding; (C) steel SAF 250, visible austenite islands in a ferritic matrix; (D) Inconel 625, visible austenite grains with twinning boundaries; (E) Al 1050, dark inclusions; (F) Al 5083, state after plastic deformation and annealing. Visible solution α grains and Al (Mn, Fe, Si) inclusions, inter-metallic phases of Al3Mg2 and texture of deformation and (G) titanium grade 1, visible grains with twinning boundaries. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 2
Microstructure of bimetal SAF 2504 – P355NH: (A) 100× magnification; (B) 200× magnification; and (C) 500× magnification. Etched state, light microscopy, (D) 500× magnification
Fig. 3
Results of SAM C-scan ultrasonic tests, SAF 2504 – P355NH joints: (A) threshold 45% of reference range; (B) threshold 65% of reference range and (C) threshold 85% of reference range
Fig. 4
Results of ultrasonic tests of SAF 2504 – P355NH joint: (1) surface 0.63 mm2, (2) surface 0.14 mm2, (3) surface 0.11 mm2 and (4) surface 0.23 mm2
Fig. 5
C-scan and B-scan acoustic cross-sections of SAF 2504 – P355NH bimetal for two selected scanning lines: (A) cross section A-A and (B) cross section B-B
Fig. 6
X-scan presentations of SAF 2504 – P355NH joint: (A) C-scan registered in 2.9–3.00 mm range; (B) depth 2.94 mm; (C) depth 2.95 mm; (D) depth 2.96 mm; (E) depth 2.97 mm and (F) depth 2.98 mm
Fig. 7
Microstructure of Inconel 625 – P355NH bimetal: (A) magnification 100×; (B) magnification 100×; and (C) magnification 200×. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 8
Results of C-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of the Inconel 625 – P355NH joint. Close-ups of particular indications: (1) surface 0.03 mm2; (2) surface 0.09 mm2; (3) surface 0.05 mm2 and (4) surface 0.06 mm2, scanning acoustic microscope
Fig. 9
C-scan and B-scan acoustic cross-sections of Inconel 625 – P355NH bimetal for two selected scanning lines: (A) cross section A–A and (B) cross section B–B
Fig. 10
X-scan presentations of Inconel 625 – P355NH joint: (A) C-scan registered in the range of 3.01–3.06 mm; (B) depth 3.01 mm; (C) depth 3.02 mm; (D) depth 3.04 mm; (E) depth 3.05 mm and (F) depth 3.06 mm
Fig. 11
Microstructure of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083: (A) steel grade D – Ti grade 1, magnification 100×; (B) steel grade D – Ti grade 1, magnification 200×; (C) Ti grade 1 – Al 1050, magnification 100×; (D) Ti grade 1 – Al 1050, magnification 500×; (E) Al 1050 – Al 5083, magnification 100× and (F) Al 1050 – Al 5083, magnification 500×. Etched state, light microscopy
Fig. 12
Results of C-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083. Close-ups of particular indications: (1) surface 0.44 mm2, (2) surface 1.51 mm2, (3) surface 0.27 mm2 and (4) surface 0.52 mm2
Fig. 13
Results of C-scan and B-scan indications of ultrasonic tests of a four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083 for two selected scanning lines (in both cases steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 are visible): (A) cross section A–A and (B) cross section B–B
Fig. 14
A four-layer clad plate: steel grade D – Ti grade 1 – Al 1050 – Al 5083, X-scan: (A) depth 11.90 mm, (B) depth 11.91 mm, (C) depth 11.92 mm, (D) depth 11.93 mm, (E) depth 11.94 mm and (F) depth 11.95 mm, scanning acoustic microscope
Vorschau