Accès libre

Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in the Energy Industry — Trends of Change

À propos de cet article

Citez

Dynamics of the amounts donated to charity by the Energa Foundation in 2011–2019

Period Variable Variable single index Chain index
Year Amount donated to charity (PLN) 2011 = 1 Previous year = 1
2011 3,646,979.04 1.00
2012 2,538,921.05 0.70 0.70
2013 2,318,226.00 0.64 0.91
2014 2,580,659.00 0.71 1.11
2015 2,411,775.00 0.66 0.93
2016 3,756,960.00 1.03 1.56
2017 4,097,949.38 1.12 1.09
2018 8,262,853.13 2.27 2.02
2019 4,571,510.12 1.25 0.55

Dynamics of the amount of blood collected during the Drop of Energy campaign in 2012–2019

Period Variable Variable single index Chain index Average rate of change over time
Year Amount of blood collected during the Drop of Energy campaign 2012 = 1 Previous year = 1
2012 23 1.00 0.45
2013 105 4.57 4.57
2014 92 4.00 0.88
2015 130 5.65 1.41
2016 244 10.61 1.88
2017 273 11.87 1.12
2018 340 14.78 1.25
2019 306 13.30 0.90

Dynamics of the amount of investment in communities in the form of donations of the Energa Group from 2011 to 2019

Period Variable Variable single index Chain index
Year Amount of investment in the community in the form of donations (PLN million) 2011= 1 Previous year = 1
2011 4.5 1.00
2012 2.4 0.53 0.53
2013 3 0.67 1.25
2014 3.1 0.69 1.03
2015 3 0.67 0.97
2016 11 2.44 3.67
2017 13 2.89 1.18
2018 11 2.44 0.85
2019 10 2.22 0.91

Dynamics of the volume of funds raised by Active Charity campaign from 2014 to 2021

Period Variable Variable single index Chain index
Year Funds raised through the Active Charity campaign (tys. zł) 2014 = 1 Previous year = 1
2014 240 100.00
2015 140     0.58 0.58
2016 150     0.63 1.07
2017 150     0.63 1.00
2018 350     1.46 2.33
2019 350     1.46 1.00
2020 200     0.83 0.57
2021 300     1.25 1.50

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) — selected approaches over the years

Study Understanding of CSR
Bowen (1953)

Commitment of companies to make policies, decisions and undertakings that reflect social expectations as the most important rationale for their activities.

Davis (1973)

The evaluation and response of a company to problems located outside the narrowly defined scope of economic, technical and legal requirements placed on the company.

Carroll (1979, 1991)

Strategies and operational practices that enhance a company’s competitiveness while improving the livelihoods of the local communities around which it operates-CSR is based on a ‘pyramid structure of corporate responsibility’, consisting of four areas of responsibility: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic.

Matten and Moon (2008)

Company policies and practices that reflect the responsibility of business for part of the broader social good, with the specific shape and scope of these responsibilities left to the discretion of the enterprise.

Visser (2010, 2014)

CSR 2.0 is the so-called fifth transformational stage in the CSR evolution model, which stems from the responsibility paradigm and manifests itself in the company’s efforts to discover and eliminate the causes of inequality and threats to sustainability by introducing innovative business models that change (revolutionise) processes, products and services.

Perceiving corporate responsibility from a macro perspective (the natural ecosystem as a whole, society as a whole, not just the local community).

International Standard ISO 26000

Responsibility of an organisation for its decisions and their impact on society and the environment through transparent and ethical behaviour that contributes to sustainable development, including the health and well-being of society, addresses stakeholder expectations, complies with applicable laws and is consistent with international standards of conduct and is integrated into the organisation’s operations and practiced in its relationships.

Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2014/95/EU)

The Directive requires certain large entities to disclose relevant non-financial and information regarding diversity to provide investors and other stakeholders with a more complete picture of their development, performance, position and impact of their operations.

Dynamics of the number of participants in the Active Charity campaign from 2014 to 2019

Period Variable Variable single index Chain index Average rate of change over time
Year Number of participants in the Active Charity 2014 = 1 Previous year = 1
2014 204 1.00 0.21
2015 443 2.17 2.17
2016 477 2.34 1.08
2017 561 2.75 1.18
2018 611 3.00 1.09
2019 533 2.61 0.87

Availability of quantitative data describing Energa Group’s social responsibility from 2011 to 2021

Measure 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Environment
1. Share of renewable energy in the total volume of gross energy produced x x x x x x x x x x x
2. Total consumption of raw materials x x x x x x x x x
3. Consumption of renewable raw materials x x x x x x x x x x x
4. Total air emissions Employees x x x x x x x x x
Employees
5. Average number of training hours per employee x x x x x x x x
6. Percentage of employees with permanent contracts among those with employment contracts x x x x x x x x x x
7. Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements Communities x x x x x x
Communities
8. Amount donated to charity x x x x x x x x x
9. Funds raised through the Active Charity campaign x x x x x x x x
10. Number of participants in the Active Charity campaign x x x x x x
11. The amount of blood collected in the framework of the Drop of Energy campaign x x x x x x x x
12. Amount of investment in the community in the form of donations x x x x x x x x x