Accès libre

Porcine enteric coronavirus infections in wild boar in Poland – a pilot study

Marta Antas

Marta Antas

Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research InstitutePuławy, Poland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Antas, Marta
, 
Monika Olech

Monika Olech

Department of Biochemistry, National Veterinary Research InstitutePuławy, Poland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Olech, Monika
 et 
Anna Szczotka-Bochniarz

Anna Szczotka-Bochniarz

Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research InstitutePuławy, Poland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Szczotka-Bochniarz, Anna
  
22 juil. 2021
Porcine enteric coronavirus infections in wild boar in Poland – a pilot study's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 22 juil. 2021
Pages: 265 - 269
Reçu: 16 févr. 2021
Accepté: 01 juil. 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2021-0041
Mots clés
© 2021 M. Antas et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Geographic distribution of samples collected from wild boars in Poland. Areas in grey correspond to voivodships from which samples were collected. The red dots indicate the areas of origin of wild boar samples found positive in ELISA assays; n – the number of samples collected in particular areas
Geographic distribution of samples collected from wild boars in Poland. Areas in grey correspond to voivodships from which samples were collected. The red dots indicate the areas of origin of wild boar samples found positive in ELISA assays; n – the number of samples collected in particular areas

Fig. 2

Distribution of the S/P (%) values of samples tested in this study. The samples which yielded S/P ratios higher than 60% (the cut-off shown as the dotted line) were considered PEDV-positive, and samples with lower ratios were considered negative
Distribution of the S/P (%) values of samples tested in this study. The samples which yielded S/P ratios higher than 60% (the cut-off shown as the dotted line) were considered PEDV-positive, and samples with lower ratios were considered negative
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Sciences de la vie, Biologie moléculaire, Microbiologie et virologie, Sciences de la vie, autres, Médecine, Médecine vétérinaire
RSS Feed de la revue