[American Poultry Association (2001). The American Standard of Perfection. APA, Troy, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[AO AC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AO AC International. 16th Edition. Association of Ana- lytical Chemistry, Arlington, VA, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berri C., Le Bihan-Duval E., Baeza E., Chartrin P., Picgirard L.,Jehl N., Quen- tin M., Piccard M., Duc los J. (2005). Further processing characteristics of breast and leg meat from fast-medium- and slow-growing commercial chickens. Anim. Res.. 54: 123-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[British United Turkeys (2013). B.U.T. 6 Commercial performance objectives, http :/Avww.a viagentur- keys.com/media/207198/vl_but_6_commercialgoals_uk.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burke W.H.. Henry M.H. (1997). Characteristics of the Pectoralis supeificialis and Semimem- branosus of broiler strain chickens, bantam chickens, and the reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei., 76: 767-773.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheema M.A.. Qureshi M.A., Havenstein G.B., Ferket PR., Nestor K.E. (2007). A comparison of the immune response of 2003 commercial turkeys and a 1966 randombred strain when fed representative 2003 and 1966 turkey diets. Poultry Sei., 86: 241-248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damaziak K., Michalczuk M., K u r e k A. (2012). Comparison of production performance of two genetic groups of turkeys reared in the semi-intensive system. JCEA, 13: 403^15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damaziak K., Pietrzak P., Michalczuk M., Mroczek J., Niemiec J. (2013). Effect of genotype and sex on selected quality attributes of turkey meat. Arch. Geflügelk., 77: 206-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dickerson G.E. (1969). Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 37: 191-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanatico A.C., Cavill L.C., Pi 11 ai P.B., Emmert J.L., Owens C.M. (2005). Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poultry Sei., 84: 1785-1790.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fanatico A.C.. Pillai P.B., Hester P.Y., Falcone C., Mech J.A., Owens C.M., Em- me r t J.L. (2008). Performance, livability, and carcass yield of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Sei., 87: 1012-1021.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havenstain G.B., Ferket PR., Grimes J.L.. Qureshi M.A., Nestor K.E. (2007). Com- parison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, livability; and feed conversion. Poultry Sei., 86: 232-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Julian R.J. (2005). Production and growth related disorders and other metabolic diseases of poultry - A review. Vet. J., 169: 350-369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamara D., Gyenai K.B., Geng T, Hammade H . Smith E.J. (2007). Microsatellite mark- er-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage turkeys (Meleagridis gal- lopavo). Poultry Sei., 86: 46-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirby Y.K., Anthony N.B., Hughes J.D., Mcnew R.W., Kibry J.D., Wide man R.F. (1999). Electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation of giant jungle fowl, broilers and their recipro- cal crosses following unilateral bronchus occlusion. Poultry Sei., 78: 125-134. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Laird A.K.. Tyler S.A.. Burton A.D. (1965). Dynamic of normal growth. Growth. 29: 233-248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larzul C., I in b e r t B., Bernadet M.D.. Guy G., R e in i g n o n H. (2006). Meat quality in an intergeneric factorial crossbreeding between muscovy (Cairina moschata) and Pekin (Anas platy- rhynchos) ducks. INRA. Anim. Res.. 55: 219-229.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lilbrn M.S.. Antonelli A. (2012). The effects of genotype on embryonic development in eggs from divergent turkey genotypes. Poultry Sei.. 91: 823-828.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mignon-Grasteau S.. Beaumont C. (2000). Growth curves in birds (in France). INRA Prod.Anim.. 13: 337-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikulski D.. Celej J.. Jankowski J.. Majewska T., Mikulska M. (2011). Growth per- formance. carcass traits and meat quality of slowTer-growing and fast-growing chickens raised with and without outdoor access. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sei.. 24: 1407-1416.10.5713/ajas.2011.11038]Search in Google Scholar
[Murawska D. (2013). Age-related changes in the percentage content of edible and nonedible compo- nents in turkeys. Poultry Sei.. 92: 255-264.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nahashon S.N.. Ay or ined K.L.. Drummond R.Dewes M.. Smith E.J. (1999). Heterosis for growth related traits in White Plymouth Rock and single comb White Leghorn reciprocal crosses reared under two crude protein regimens. J. Anim. Feed Sei.. 8: 51-61.10.22358/jafs/68807/1999]Search in Google Scholar
[Nestor K.E.. Anderson J.W.. Hartzier D., Veileman S.G. (2005). Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkeys. 4. Body shape and carcass traits. Poultry Sei.. 84: 1825-1834.10.1093/ps/84.12.182516479937]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards F.J. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot.. 10: 290-300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarica M.. Oc ak N.. Karagay N.. Yamak U.. Kop C.Altom A. (2009). Growth, slaughter and gastrointestinal tract of three mrkey genotypes under bam and free-range housing systems. Brit.Poultry Sei.. 50: 487^94.10.1080/0007166090311091919735018]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheng Z.. Pettersson M.E.. Hu X.. Luo Ch.. Qu H.. Shu D.. Shen X.. Carlborg Ö., Li N. (2013). Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous x commercial broiler chicken cross. BMC Genomics. 14: 151-163.10.1186/1471-2164-14-151367973323497136]Search in Google Scholar
[Sola - Ojo F.E.. Ayorinde K.L. (2011). Evaluation of reproductive performance and egg quality traits in progenies of Dominant Black strain crossed with Fulani Ecotype chicken. J. Agr. Sei.. 3: 258-265.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao X.L., Siegel P.B..Liu Y.P.Wang Y.. Gilbert E.R.Zhu Q.. Zhang L. (2012). Hous- ing system affects broiler characteristics of local Chinese breed reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2405-2410.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhong Z.. Muckley M.. Agcaogu A.. Grishan M.E.. Zhao H.. Orth M.. Liburn O.Akkus O. Karelier D.M. (2012). The morphological, material-level, and ash properties of turkey femurs from 3 different genetic strains during production. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2736-2746. 10.3382/ps.2012-0232223091126]Search in Google Scholar