Variation in Growth Performance and Carcass Yield of Pure and Reciprocal Crossbred Turkeys

American Poultry Association (2001). The American Standard of Perfection. APA, Troy, NY.Search in Google Scholar

AO AC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AO AC International. 16th Edition. Association of Ana- lytical Chemistry, Arlington, VA, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Berri C., Le Bihan-Duval E., Baeza E., Chartrin P., Picgirard L.,Jehl N., Quen- tin M., Piccard M., Duc los J. (2005). Further processing characteristics of breast and leg meat from fast-medium- and slow-growing commercial chickens. Anim. Res.. 54: 123-134.Search in Google Scholar

British United Turkeys (2013). B.U.T. 6 Commercial performance objectives, http :/Avww.a viagentur- keys.com/media/207198/vl_but_6_commercialgoals_uk.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Burke W.H.. Henry M.H. (1997). Characteristics of the Pectoralis supeificialis and Semimem- branosus of broiler strain chickens, bantam chickens, and the reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei., 76: 767-773.Search in Google Scholar

Cheema M.A.. Qureshi M.A., Havenstein G.B., Ferket PR., Nestor K.E. (2007). A comparison of the immune response of 2003 commercial turkeys and a 1966 randombred strain when fed representative 2003 and 1966 turkey diets. Poultry Sei., 86: 241-248.Search in Google Scholar

Damaziak K., Michalczuk M., K u r e k A. (2012). Comparison of production performance of two genetic groups of turkeys reared in the semi-intensive system. JCEA, 13: 403^15.Search in Google Scholar

Damaziak K., Pietrzak P., Michalczuk M., Mroczek J., Niemiec J. (2013). Effect of genotype and sex on selected quality attributes of turkey meat. Arch. Geflügelk., 77: 206-214.Search in Google Scholar

Dickerson G.E. (1969). Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 37: 191-202.Search in Google Scholar

Fanatico A.C., Cavill L.C., Pi 11 ai P.B., Emmert J.L., Owens C.M. (2005). Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poultry Sei., 84: 1785-1790.Search in Google Scholar

Fanatico A.C.. Pillai P.B., Hester P.Y., Falcone C., Mech J.A., Owens C.M., Em- me r t J.L. (2008). Performance, livability, and carcass yield of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poultry Sei., 87: 1012-1021.Search in Google Scholar

Havenstain G.B., Ferket PR., Grimes J.L.. Qureshi M.A., Nestor K.E. (2007). Com- parison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, livability; and feed conversion. Poultry Sei., 86: 232-240.Search in Google Scholar

Julian R.J. (2005). Production and growth related disorders and other metabolic diseases of poultry - A review. Vet. J., 169: 350-369.Search in Google Scholar

Kamara D., Gyenai K.B., Geng T, Hammade H . Smith E.J. (2007). Microsatellite mark- er-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage turkeys (Meleagridis gal- lopavo). Poultry Sei., 86: 46-49.Search in Google Scholar

Kirby Y.K., Anthony N.B., Hughes J.D., Mcnew R.W., Kibry J.D., Wide man R.F. (1999). Electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation of giant jungle fowl, broilers and their recipro- cal crosses following unilateral bronchus occlusion. Poultry Sei., 78: 125-134. Search in Google Scholar

Laird A.K.. Tyler S.A.. Burton A.D. (1965). Dynamic of normal growth. Growth. 29: 233-248.Search in Google Scholar

Larzul C., I in b e r t B., Bernadet M.D.. Guy G., R e in i g n o n H. (2006). Meat quality in an intergeneric factorial crossbreeding between muscovy (Cairina moschata) and Pekin (Anas platy- rhynchos) ducks. INRA. Anim. Res.. 55: 219-229.Search in Google Scholar

Lilbrn M.S.. Antonelli A. (2012). The effects of genotype on embryonic development in eggs from divergent turkey genotypes. Poultry Sei.. 91: 823-828.Search in Google Scholar

Mignon-Grasteau S.. Beaumont C. (2000). Growth curves in birds (in France). INRA Prod.Anim.. 13: 337-348.Search in Google Scholar

Mikulski D.. Celej J.. Jankowski J.. Majewska T., Mikulska M. (2011). Growth per- formance. carcass traits and meat quality of slow^Ter-growing and fast-growing chickens raised with and without outdoor access. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sei.. 24: 1407-1416.10.5713/ajas.2011.11038Search in Google Scholar

Murawska D. (2013). Age-related changes in the percentage content of edible and nonedible compo- nents in turkeys. Poultry Sei.. 92: 255-264.Search in Google Scholar

Nahashon S.N.. Ay or ined K.L.. Drummond R.Dewes M.. Smith E.J. (1999). Heterosis for growth related traits in White Plymouth Rock and single comb White Leghorn reciprocal crosses reared under two crude protein regimens. J. Anim. Feed Sei.. 8: 51-61.10.22358/jafs/68807/1999Search in Google Scholar

Nestor K.E.. Anderson J.W.. Hartzier D., Veileman S.G. (2005). Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkeys. 4. Body shape and carcass traits. Poultry Sei.. 84: 1825-1834.10.1093/ps/84.12.182516479937Search in Google Scholar

Richards F.J. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot.. 10: 290-300.Search in Google Scholar

Sarica M.. Oc ak N.. Karagay N.. Yamak U.. Kop C.Altom A. (2009). Growth, slaughter and gastrointestinal tract of three mrkey genotypes under bam and free-range housing systems. Brit.Poultry Sei.. 50: 487^94.10.1080/0007166090311091919735018Search in Google Scholar

Sheng Z.. Pettersson M.E.. Hu X.. Luo Ch.. Qu H.. Shu D.. Shen X.. Carlborg Ö., Li N. (2013). Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous x commercial broiler chicken cross. BMC Genomics. 14: 151-163.10.1186/1471-2164-14-151367973323497136Search in Google Scholar

Sola - Ojo F.E.. Ayorinde K.L. (2011). Evaluation of reproductive performance and egg quality traits in progenies of Dominant Black strain crossed with Fulani Ecotype chicken. J. Agr. Sei.. 3: 258-265.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao X.L., Siegel P.B..Liu Y.P.Wang Y.. Gilbert E.R.Zhu Q.. Zhang L. (2012). Hous- ing system affects broiler characteristics of local Chinese breed reciprocal crosses. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2405-2410.Search in Google Scholar

Zhong Z.. Muckley M.. Agcaogu A.. Grishan M.E.. Zhao H.. Orth M.. Liburn O.Akkus O. Karelier D.M. (2012). The morphological, material-level, and ash properties of turkey femurs from 3 different genetic strains during production. Poultry Sei.. 91: 2736-2746. 10.3382/ps.2012-0232223091126Search in Google Scholar