Accès libre

Dispute Resolution That Divides: The EU -USA Conflict on Investment -State Dispute Resolution

   | 19 août 2021
À propos de cet article

Citez

Bottini G., Reform of the Investor -State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal, (in:) J.E. Kalicki, A. Joubin -Bret (eds.), Reshaping the Investor -State Dispute Settlement System, BRILL, 2015, pp. 455–473, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_021.10.1163/9789004291102_021 Search in Google Scholar

Bown Ch.P., On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement, “The Review of Economics and Statistics”, 2004, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 811–823.10.1162/0034653041811680 Search in Google Scholar

Bussiè re M., Pé rez -Barreiro E., Straub R., Taglioni D., Protectionist responses to the crisis – global trends and implications, ECB Occasional Paper, No. 110 (2010), European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M.10.2139/ssrn.1325251 Search in Google Scholar

Caporal, Jack: What Is Former Vice President Biden’s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic & International Studies, 12 February, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Caytas J.,: From Shield to Sword: TTIP’s Lessons on Democratic Legitimacy for International Investment Arbitration,„Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems: Common Law” (Apr. 23, 2015),https://ssrn.com/abstract=2685501. Search in Google Scholar

De Ville F., Siles -Brü gge G., Why TTIP is a game -changer and its critics have a point, „Journal of European Public Policy”, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273.10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273 Search in Google Scholar

Garcia -Duran P., Eliasson L.J., The Public Debate over Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and Its Underlying Assumptions,„Journal of World Trade”, 2017, Vol 51 No. 1, pp. 23–42.10.54648/TRAD2017002 Search in Google Scholar

Gaukrodger D., Adjudicator Compensation Systems and Investor -State Dispute Settlement, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2017/05, OECD Publishing, Paris,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/c2890bd5-en.10.1787/c2890bd5-en Search in Google Scholar

Hallak I., Multilateral Investment Court – Overview of the reform proposals and prospects, European Parliament Research Service, PE 646.147, January 2020,https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/646147/EPRS_BRI(2020)646147_EN.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Hodgson M., Campbell A., Damages and costs in investment treaty arbitration revisited, “Global Arbitration Review”, 14 December 2017,http://www.itd.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Annex-2-Allen-and-Overy-Damages-and-costs-in-investment-treaty-arbitration-revisited--December-2017.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Horváthy B., Potential Impacts of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations on the EU Environmental Policy, “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies”, 2016, Vol. 57. No. 4, pp. 401–415, doi: https://doi.org/10.1556%2F2052.2016.57.4.1.10.1556/2052.2016.57.4.1 Search in Google Scholar

ICC, Dispute Resolution 2019 Statistics, Paris, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Johnson L., Sachs L., Sach J., Investor -State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law, Columbia Center of Sustainable Developement, CCSI Policy Paper, May 2015,https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D82N52TP. Search in Google Scholar

Jugmittag, Andre, Welfens, Paul J.J.: EU -US trade post -trump perspectives: TTIP aspects related to foreign direct investment and innovation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2020/17. pp. 259–294.10.1007/s10368-020-00459-1 Search in Google Scholar

Kohler W., Stähler F., The economics of investor protection: ISDS versus national treatment, “Journal of International Economics”, 2019, Volume 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254.10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254 Search in Google Scholar

Wallach L., The US Drops ISDS, “The Globalist”, 24 January, 2020, https://www.theglobalist.com/united-states-european-union-trade-isds-usmca-uncitral-mic/. Search in Google Scholar

McRae D., What is the future of WTO Dispute Settlement, “Journal of International Economic Law”, 2004, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3–21.10.1093/jiel/7.1.3 Search in Google Scholar

Merrils J.G., International Dispute Settlement, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell A.D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511674556 Search in Google Scholar

Moses M.L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, 2017.10.1017/9781316585245 Search in Google Scholar

Rivkin, D.W., Enforceability of Arbitral Awards Based on Lex Mercatoria, “Arbitration International”, 1993, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 67–84.10.1093/arbitration/9.1.67 Search in Google Scholar

Schreuer Ch.H. et al, The ISCID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511596896 Search in Google Scholar

VanGrasstek C., The Trade Policy of the United States under the Trump Administration, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019/11, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60889/RSCAS_2019_11.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.3330577 Search in Google Scholar

Yang H., The EU’s Investment Court System and Prospects for a New Multilateral Investment Dispute Settlement System (October 12, 2017), “KIEP Research Paper”, No. Policy References 17–06, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063843.10.2139/ssrn.3063843 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2719-9452
Langues:
Anglais, Polaco
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Law, International Law, Foreign Law, Comparative Law, other, European Law, Social Sciences, Political Science