[
Bottini G., Reform of the Investor -State Arbitration Regime: The Appeal Proposal, (in:) J.E. Kalicki, A. Joubin -Bret (eds.), Reshaping the Investor -State Dispute Settlement System, BRILL, 2015, pp. 455–473, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_021.10.1163/9789004291102_021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bown Ch.P., On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement, “The Review of Economics and Statistics”, 2004, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 811–823.10.1162/0034653041811680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bussiè re M., Pé rez -Barreiro E., Straub R., Taglioni D., Protectionist responses to the crisis – global trends and implications, ECB Occasional Paper, No. 110 (2010), European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M.10.2139/ssrn.1325251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caporal, Jack: What Is Former Vice President Biden’s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic s Policy on Trade? Center for Strategic & International Studies, 12 February, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caytas J.,: From Shield to Sword: TTIP’s Lessons on Democratic Legitimacy for International Investment Arbitration,„Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems: Common Law” (Apr. 23, 2015),https://ssrn.com/abstract=2685501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Ville F., Siles -Brü gge G., Why TTIP is a game -changer and its critics have a point, „Journal of European Public Policy”, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273.10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcia -Duran P., Eliasson L.J., The Public Debate over Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and Its Underlying Assumptions,„Journal of World Trade”, 2017, Vol 51 No. 1, pp. 23–42.10.54648/TRAD2017002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaukrodger D., Adjudicator Compensation Systems and Investor -State Dispute Settlement, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2017/05, OECD Publishing, Paris,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/c2890bd5-en.10.1787/c2890bd5-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hallak I., Multilateral Investment Court – Overview of the reform proposals and prospects, European Parliament Research Service, PE 646.147, January 2020,https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/646147/EPRS_BRI(2020)646147_EN.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodgson M., Campbell A., Damages and costs in investment treaty arbitration revisited, “Global Arbitration Review”, 14 December 2017,http://www.itd.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Annex-2-Allen-and-Overy-Damages-and-costs-in-investment-treaty-arbitration-revisited--December-2017.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváthy B., Potential Impacts of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations on the EU Environmental Policy, “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies”, 2016, Vol. 57. No. 4, pp. 401–415, doi: https://doi.org/10.1556%2F2052.2016.57.4.1.10.1556/2052.2016.57.4.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ICC, Dispute Resolution 2019 Statistics, Paris, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson L., Sachs L., Sach J., Investor -State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law, Columbia Center of Sustainable Developement, CCSI Policy Paper, May 2015,https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D82N52TP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jugmittag, Andre, Welfens, Paul J.J.: EU -US trade post -trump perspectives: TTIP aspects related to foreign direct investment and innovation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2020/17. pp. 259–294.10.1007/s10368-020-00459-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohler W., Stähler F., The economics of investor protection: ISDS versus national treatment, “Journal of International Economics”, 2019, Volume 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254.10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallach L., The US Drops ISDS, “The Globalist”, 24 January, 2020, https://www.theglobalist.com/united-states-european-union-trade-isds-usmca-uncitral-mic/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McRae D., What is the future of WTO Dispute Settlement, “Journal of International Economic Law”, 2004, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3–21.10.1093/jiel/7.1.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merrils J.G., International Dispute Settlement, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell A.D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511674556
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moses M.L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, 2017.10.1017/9781316585245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivkin, D.W., Enforceability of Arbitral Awards Based on Lex Mercatoria, “Arbitration International”, 1993, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 67–84.10.1093/arbitration/9.1.67
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schreuer Ch.H. et al, The ISCID Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511596896
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VanGrasstek C., The Trade Policy of the United States under the Trump Administration, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019/11, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60889/RSCAS_2019_11.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.3330577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang H., The EU’s Investment Court System and Prospects for a New Multilateral Investment Dispute Settlement System (October 12, 2017), “KIEP Research Paper”, No. Policy References 17–06, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063843.10.2139/ssrn.3063843
]Search in Google Scholar