1. bookVolume 3 (2016): Edition 2 (December 2016)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2353-5415
Première parution
29 Sep 2014
Périodicité
1 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

An intuitive approach to learning delivery in Higher Education

Publié en ligne: 22 Dec 2016
Volume & Edition: Volume 3 (2016) - Edition 2 (December 2016)
Pages: 8 - 14
Reçu: 01 Sep 2016
Accepté: 01 Nov 2016
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2353-5415
Première parution
29 Sep 2014
Périodicité
1 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

[1] Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution10.1163/9789004406155Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the ProfessoriateSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton, N.JSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The psychologist, 26(2), 120-123Search in Google Scholar

[5] Conole, G. (2010) Bridging the gap between policy and practice: A framework for technological intervention. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 13-27Search in Google Scholar

[6] de Freitas, S. & Conole, G. (2010) The influence of pervasive and integrative tools on learners’ experiences and expectations of study. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham & S. de Freitas (Eds), Rethinking learning in the Digital Age, London & New York: RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Ellis, R.A. and Goodyear, P. (2010) Student experiences of e-learning in higher education: the ecology of sustainable innovation. London: RoutledgeFalmerSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Teaching Technologies. 2nd ed. Routledge Falmer: London and New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-56310.1177/1052562904271199Search in Google Scholar

[10] Salmon, G. (2000). E‐moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. United Kingdom: Kogan PageSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Seale, J., & Cooper, M. (2010). E-learning and accessibility: An exploration of the potential role of generic pedagogical tools. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1107-111610.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.017Search in Google Scholar

[12] Smith, D. (2016). Teaching University Subjects Online, Changing Technology and Pedagogical Practice. Advances in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 3(1)Search in Google Scholar

[13] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SageSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Steel, C., & Levy, M. (2009). Creativity and constraint: Understanding teacher beliefs and the use of LMS technologies. Same places, different spaces: Proceedings of ascilite Auckland, 1013-1022Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD