Development and Evaluation of a Rapid GII Norovirus Detection Method Based on CRISPR-Cas12a
Article Category: ORIGINAL PAPER
Publicado en línea: 04 mar 2024
Páginas: 89 - 97
Recibido: 28 oct 2023
Aceptado: 22 ene 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-009
Palabras clave
© 2024 Xinyi Hu et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Norovirus was the first known as Norwalk virus, virus particles discovered in the feces of patients through immunoelectron microscopy by the American scholar Kapikian, during an outbreak of diarrhea in the town of Norwalk (Ohio, USA) in 1972 (Kapikian et al. 1972). Norovirus is one of the most predominant pathogens that lead to nonbacterial gastroenteritis in children and adults, which is associated with nearly 50% of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) outbreaks and represents the second largest burden of all infectious diseases (Lozano et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2023;). It is estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that norovirus causes over 600 million cases of diarrhea and 200 thousand deaths annually, resulting in an economic burden of approximately $60 billion (Pires et al. 2015; Ludwig-Begall et al. 2021). However, these numbers may underestimate the true incidence of norovirus-related gastroenteritis because this infection is self-limited, and not all infected patients will seek or require medical care.
Norovirus is a nonenveloped icosahedral small virus that belongs to the Norovirus genus of the Human Caliciviridae family, with a diameter of approximately 38 nm, and its genome consists of a single-stranded positive-sense RNA molecule with a base length of approximately 7.5 kb (Fernández and Gómez 2010). Currently, the genome of norovirus can be categorized into at least 10 genogroups (GI–GX) (Chhabra et al. 2019), among which GI, GII, GIV, GVIII, and GIX can infect humans. In China, GII norovirus infection accounts for the vast majority (over 80%) (Xue et al. 2018; Li et al. 2022; Qi et al. 2023). Norovirus is mainly transmitted via fecal-oral routes, encompassing human-to-human transmission or indirect transmission via contaminated food or water (Vega et al. 2011; Shang et al. 2017), and can infect humans at a low dose with only 10–100 viral particles (Teunis et al. 2008). Norovirus is, therefore, highly contagious, which can give rise to large outbreaks and induce great harm to the population.
Studies have reported that norovirus can be cultured in human cells (Jones et al. 2014; Ettayebi et al. 2016), but it is slow-growing and unstable, so no clinical laboratories use culture to detect norovirus. There are some detection methods for norovirus infection, such as electron microscopy (Utagawa et al. 2002), RT-PCR (Kanwar et al. 2018), and ELISA technique (Kele et al. 2011). Nucleic acid molecular testing based on real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR is the gold standard for norovirus but requires specialized laboratories for analysis (Rupprom et al. 2017). However, rather than relying on expensive equipment, these techniques require highly trained professionals, significantly limiting their use at the point of care or in low-resource regions. Therefore, there is a need for a simple, rapid, highly specific, and sensitive assay that does not require special equipment or instrumentation to detect norovirus.
Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a new thermostatic amplification technology first proposed in 2006 by scholars Piepenburg et al. (2006), and the amplification can be completed within 10–20 min under a thermostatic condition of 37°C–42°C in a water or dry-bath incubator, independent of variable-temperature equipment such as a PCR instrument. CRISPR-Cas system, which is an adaptive immune system formed in prokaryotes during long-term evolution, can discriminate targets and non-targets based on PAM sites on nucleic acids of target sequences via the complementary pairing of guide RNAs (gRNAs) to nucleic acids of target sequences (Liu et al. 2022). Upon the activation of Cas12a by a specific target sequence, nonspecific shear is available for arbitrary single-stranded DNA. Current isothermal amplification approaches such as RPA and LAMP can be applied in conjunction with CRISPR-Cas12a for diverse
All primers, FAM-BHQ1 co-tagged single-stranded DNA probe, and FAM-Biotin co-tagged single-stranded DNA probe utilized in the present study were designed independently by our laboratory, and their synthesis was accomplished by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (China); crRNA was synthesized by GeneBiogist company (China). All sequences are listed in Table I. The RPA reagent was procured from TwistDx™ Ltd. (UK), while LbaCas12a and NEBuffer™ 3.1 were supplied by New England Biolabs (USA). The nucleic acid extraction kit (SPARKeasy Virus RNA Kit, Sparkjade Biotech, China), Norovirus positive control product (Norovirus full sequence pseudovirus standard, 106 copies/μl), and Norovirus nucleic acid detection kit (PCR-fluorescent probe method) were purchased from Land Medical Co., Ltd. (China).
Primers and crRNA sequences.
| Oligonucleotide | Sequence (5’–3’) |
|---|---|
| RPA forward primers | CCTCTCTTCACGGACCCTCTTTCTACAGC |
| RPA reverse primers | TTCATTCACAAAATTGGGAGCCAGATTGC |
| crRNA | AGUGCCUGGGAGAAAGAUGUCGUUU |
| ssDNA reporters | FAM-TTATTATT-BHQ1 |
| FAM-TTATTATT-Biotin |
Diarrheal fecal samples were obtained in February 2023 from 35 patients with clinically suspected norovirus infection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and Anhui Provincial Children’s Hospital. All patients met the diagnostic criteria for acute gastroenteritis and the inclusion criteria: (1) increased stool frequency (three or more bowel movements per day); (2) change in fecal character (including watery stools and loose stools); (3) routine fecal symptoms suggesting that both leukocyte and erythrocyte counts were ≤ 10/higher magnification field of view (+); and (4) duration of the disease was not more than 2 weeks.
Nucleic acids were extracted from 35 diarrheal fecal samples in accordance with the specifications of a nucleic acid extraction kit and then preserved in a –80°C freezer. The following eight diarrheal pathogens DNA were extracted using nucleic acid extraction kits (Table II). The standard strains were commercially available from Shanghai Shifeng Biological Co., Ltd. (China), and the
Bacteria and viruses involved in this study.
| Name | Source of strains |
|---|---|
| CMCC(B)51572 | |
| NCTC12900 | |
| ATCC® 17802™ | |
| Clinical isolates | |
| ATCC® 33291™ | |
| CMCC(B)50024 | |
| Human astrovirus | Clinical isolates |
| Rotavirus | ATCC® VR-2274™ |
| Enteric adenovirus | ATCC® VR-930™ |
RPA primers and crRNA were designed on the strength of the nucleotide sequences in the RdRp region (Gen-Bank accession number: OQ451905.1) on the GII norovirus ORF target gene fragment. RPA primers were designed using Primer Premier v5.0 primer design software (PREMIER Biosoft, USA). Finding protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site of the original spacer sequence from the primer-amplified sequence was used for designing crRNA based on the PAM site.
With the harvested nucleic acids serving as templates, TwistAmp® basic kit (TwistDx™ Ltd., UK) was utilized for RPA amplification. Following the kit instructions, the reaction was performed with the reaction system well-mixed in the Eppendorf tube (1.5 ml), and equivalent paraffin oil was subsequently supplemented to the surface to avoid aerosol contamination.
RPA reaction system (50 μl): 2 μl forward (F) primer (10 μM), 2 μl reverse (R) primer (10 μM), 29.4 μl A buffer, 2 μl RNA template, 2.5 μl B buffer, and ddH2O supplement to 50 μl. Reaction conditions: 30-min incubation at 42°C. Subsequently, the amplified products were purified using a PCR product purification kit, followed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
The Cas12a cleavage reaction system (20 μl): 2 μl NEBuffer™ 3.1, 2 μl crRNA (1 μM), 1 μl LbCas12a (1 μM), 1 μl fluorescein isothiocyanate- and quencher-labeled reporter (1 μM), 2 μl RPA amplified product, and 12 μl ddH2O supplement. Incubation was performed at 37°C for 20 min using an Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Real-Time PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA), and fluorescence intensities were recorded at 1-min intervals. The results were visualized by fluorescence curves, wherein significantly increased fluorescence values signified positive while unchanged fluorescence values signified negative.
The Cas12a cleavage reaction system (20 μl): 2 μl NEBuffer™ 3.1, 2 μl crRNA (1 μM), 1 μl LbCas12a (1 μM), 1 μl FAM-coupled biotin reporter (1 μM), 2 μl RPA amplified product, and 12 μl ddH2O supplement. Following incubation for 20 min at 37°C, 20 μl ddH2O was added into the reaction system and well-mixed, which was next added with immunochromatographic test strips, followed by observations within 5 min; the presence of test line color reaction (color reaction of the control line or not) was regarded as positive, while only the control line color reaction was considered negative. A schematic of both RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence and An RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay is presented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Detection principle of RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence analysis and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatography detection method.
A) RPA-Cas12a method detection process; B) principle of Immunochromatography Flow Strip. C) the schematic diagram for judging the results of immunochromatography flow strips
Norovirus positive control product (106 copies/μl) was diluted in 10-fold to 6 gradient concentrations (106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 10 copies/μl). Nucleic acids were extracted referring to a nucleic acid extraction kit, and the abovementioned concentrations of controls were detected using RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assays to ascertain the lowest detection limit. The specificity of our method was verified by RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assays with pathogen nucleic acids described in Table II as templates.
Using the aforementioned RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence assay and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay, 35 diarrheal fecal samples from patients with clinically suspected norovirus infection were tested. The Norovirus nucleic acid detection kit (PCR-fluorescent probe method) was adopted as the reference method. Data from the two tests were compared, and the Chi-square test was utilized for calculating positive and negative coincident rates.
The RPA amplified fragments and design results of crRNA are depicted in Fig. 2. The results showed that our primers could successfully amplify the nucleic acids of the norovirus-positive control product and the nucleic acids of the two positive specimens. Meanwhile, the fluorescence value results showed that our designed crRNA activated CRISPR-Cas12a, allowing CRISPR-Cas12a to cleave the reporter molecules double-labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate and a bursting agent in the system.
Fig. 2.
RPA amplified fragments and design results of crRNA.
Different concentrations of norovirus nucleic acids extracted as above and pathogens’ nucleic acids described in Table II were employed for RPA amplification, and the amplified products were mixed with the crRNA above for Cas12a-fluorescence assay. The detection limit of this approach was as low as 102 copies/μl, and no fluorescence, i.e., no crossreactivity, was detected in the nine common pathogens (Fig. 3). The results of the RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay were consistent with the RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence assay.
Fig. 3.
Verification of sensitivity and specificity of the RPA-Cas12a-fluorometric and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assays. A) Sensitivity curves of different concentrations of norovirus positive quality control products amplified by RPA; B) specificity of RPA-Cas12a-fluorometric assay; C) RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic results of different concentrations of Norovirus; D) specificity of RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay
This study examined 35 diarrheal fecal samples of clinically suspected norovirus infection using RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assays. These samples were simultaneously detected using a Norovirus nucleic acid detection kit (PCR-fluorescent probe), a currently commonly used clinical method, and the results are presented in Fig. 4. The positive and negative results of the GII Norovirus Cas12a assays were 100% coincident with the positive and negative results of the Norovirus nucleic acid detection kit, respectively (Table III).
Fig. 4.
Detection of GII norovirus in clinical samples based on CRISPR-Cas12a.
A, B, C) Positive results of RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence assay of 24 samples; D) positive results of RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay of 24 samples; E) negative results of RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatographic assay of 11 samples; F, G) qPCR results of 24 positive samples
Comparison between RPA-cas12a method and qPCR.
| RPA-Cas12a | Quantitative Real-Time PCR | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | ||
| + | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| − | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Total | 24 | 11 | 35 |
Recently, the prevailing trend of norovirus has been increasingly severe in China (Lian et al. 2019), in which GII norovirus has been the predominant epidemic strain; infected individuals in rural areas are more than those in urban areas, and asymptomatic individuals are more than symptomatic individuals in the infants (Chen et al. 2023). These factors undoubtedly increase the difficulty of a positive diagnosis of norovirus.
At present, the traditional norovirus detection methods include electron microscopy and immunoassay. However, improper electron microscopy analysis can lead to false negatives or false positives, and this method is time-consuming, laborious, and difficult to use for rapid diagnosis (Chin et al. 2022).
In contrast, immunochromatography in immunoassay has a low sensitivity in detecting norovirus antigens (Vinjé 2015), which cannot yield satisfactory results. Nowadays, RT-qPCR is believed to be a reliable norovirus detection method. However, this method relies on a real-time PCR machine and is inapplicable in low-resource areas such as primary township health centers in China.
Based on the limitations of the aforementioned methods, we developed a rapid, simple, and accurate method for norovirus detection. We designed a new CRISPR-Cas12a-based technique combined with RPA, which could achieve rapid and accurate detection and vastly reduce reliance on large-scale advanced instruments. Its reaction required only one water or metal bath, and fluorescence intensities could be read by a fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument after 30-min RPA amplification and 20-min CRISPR-Cas12a transcleavage, suitable for large-scale detection of samples in developed regions. The product could also be read by immunochromatographic lateral-flow test strips, suitable for point-of-care testing and applicable in vast resource-poor areas. To address the uncapping-caused aerosol contamination issue post-RPA reaction, we supplemented equivalent paraffin oil immediately after mixing with the activators of the RPA reaction to sequester air. We collected diarrheal fecal samples from 35 patients with suspected norovirus infection for clinical validation, and the results obtained by RPA-Cas12a-fluorescence and RPA-Cas12a-immunochromatography assays showed 100% positive and negative coincident rates with the results of the Norovirus nucleic acid detection kit (PCR-fluorescent probe method). Besides, we tested diluted norovirus-positive controls at a series of gradient concentrations using the Cas12a method with the a detection limit as low as 102 copies/μl, which was consistent with that of RT-qPCR currently on the market. We also tested eight common diarrheal pathogens using the Cas12a method and detected no cross-reactivity. All the above data confirmed that our RPA-Cas12a detection method had relatively good specificity and sensitivity, which could be comparable with the currently accepted and reliable RT-qPCR.
Despite the above advantages of the RPA-Cas12a detection method, we must acknowledge that our method also had several limitations. For instance, after RPA amplification, an uncapping operation was required to transfer the amplicons, which undoubtedly increased aerosol contamination and false-positive probability. In addition, this study only detected GII Norovirus and did not detect a few prevalent strains. However, this detection method, independent of an instrument, is more conducive to the universal detection of various pathogens, including norovirus, providing an effective tool for on-site detection.
In summary, our CRISPR-based norovirus detection platform has the advantages of high sensitivity, high specificity, simple operation, and low cost, which makes it very suitable for point-of-care detection.