Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Journal of Veterinary Research
Volumen 64 (2020): Edición 2 (June 2020)
Acceso abierto
A novel, rapid, and simple PMA-qPCR method for detection and counting of viable
Brucella
organisms
Shi-Jun Zhang
Shi-Jun Zhang
,
Lu-Lu Wang
Lu-Lu Wang
,
Shi-Ying Lu
Shi-Ying Lu
,
Pan Hu
Pan Hu
,
Yan-Song Li
Yan-Song Li
,
Ying Zhang
Ying Zhang
,
Heng-Zhen Chang
Heng-Zhen Chang
,
Fei-Fei Zhai
Fei-Fei Zhai
,
Zeng-Shan Liu
Zeng-Shan Liu
,
Zhao-Hui Li
Zhao-Hui Li
y
Hong-Lin Ren
Hong-Lin Ren
| 12 may 2020
Journal of Veterinary Research
Volumen 64 (2020): Edición 2 (June 2020)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Publicado en línea:
12 may 2020
Páginas:
253 - 261
Recibido:
19 sept 2019
Aceptado:
28 abr 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0033
Palabras clave
viable bacteria
,
gene
,
propidium monoazide
,
quantitative PCR
© 2020 S.J. Zhang et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
The target BCSP31 fragment of PCR amplification from Brucella suis S2 strain. M – DL2000 DNA Marker (TaKaRa Bio); lane 1 – DNA fragment of PCR amplification
Fig. 2
The standard curve for calculating Brucella concentration according to CT of qPCR based on the template of recombinant standard plasmid pMD-18T-BCSP31
Fig. 3
Optimisation of PMA treatment conditions. A – Effect of different exposure time on qPCR amplification; B – Different concentrations of PMA treating dead bacteria; C – Different concentrations of PMA treating viable bacteria; * – P < 0.05; Yellow columns – optimal PMA treatment time of 10 min; Yellow columns with ☆ – optimal PMA treatment concentration of 15 μg/mL; × – not detected
Fig. 4
The sensitivity of detecting B. suis S2 strain. A – sensitivity by the PMA-qPCR; B – sensitivity by the conventional PCR, comprising M – DL2000 DNA Marker; lanes 1–10 – 108 – 10-1 CFU/mL
Fig. 5
Analysis of the specificity of PMA-qPCR. A – amplification plot; B – melting curves of the qPCR amplification product; C – agarose gel electrophoresis of different Brucella species detected by the normal PCR, comprising M – DL5000 DNA Marker; lane 1 – B. suis S2; lane 2 – B. abortus 2308; lane 3 – B. abortus A19; lane 4 – B. melitensis M5; lane 5 – B. melitensis 16M; and lane 6 – B. ovis; D – agarose gel electrophoresis of species other than Brucella amplified by the conventional PCR, comprising M – DL2000 DNA Marker; lane 1 – B. suis S2; lane 2 – E. coli; lane 3 – S. typhimurium; lane 4 – Y. enterocolitica; lane 5 – V. parahaemolyticus; and lane 6 – RNase-free water
Fig. 6
Analysis of different ratios of viable to dead B. suis S2 strain using the PMA-qPCR method and the qPCR method. * – P < 0.05
Fig. 7
Determination of the amount of the viable B. suis S2 strain by PMA-qPCR and plate counting methods. Pure bacterial liquid – B. suis cultured in TSB; A – B. suis harbouring in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells infected with 1.28 × 1012 CFU/mL of B. suis S2 strain; B – B. suis harbouring in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells infected with 0.64 × 1012 CFU/mL of B. suis S2 strain; * P < 0.05
Coefficient of variation for intra- and inter-batch experiments
DNA dilution times
Intra-assay
Inter-assay
Average value of CT
SD
CV
Average value of CT
SD
CV
10
7
17.55277
0.13205
0.75
17.95203
0.26862
1.50
10
6
21.9137
0.26965
1.23
22.35123
0.45614
2.04
10
5
23.80697
0.15085
0.63
23.82857
0.43607
1.83
Vista previa