Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Journal of Veterinary Research
Band 64 (2020): Heft 2 (June 2020)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
A novel, rapid, and simple PMA-qPCR method for detection and counting of viable
Brucella
organisms
Shi-Jun Zhang
Shi-Jun Zhang
,
Lu-Lu Wang
Lu-Lu Wang
,
Shi-Ying Lu
Shi-Ying Lu
,
Pan Hu
Pan Hu
,
Yan-Song Li
Yan-Song Li
,
Ying Zhang
Ying Zhang
,
Heng-Zhen Chang
Heng-Zhen Chang
,
Fei-Fei Zhai
Fei-Fei Zhai
,
Zeng-Shan Liu
Zeng-Shan Liu
,
Zhao-Hui Li
Zhao-Hui Li
und
Hong-Lin Ren
Hong-Lin Ren
| 12. Mai 2020
Journal of Veterinary Research
Band 64 (2020): Heft 2 (June 2020)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zusammenfassung
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Online veröffentlicht:
12. Mai 2020
Seitenbereich:
253 - 261
Eingereicht:
19. Sept. 2019
Akzeptiert:
28. Apr. 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0033
Schlüsselwörter
viable bacteria
,
gene
,
propidium monoazide
,
quantitative PCR
© 2020 S.J. Zhang et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
The target BCSP31 fragment of PCR amplification from Brucella suis S2 strain. M – DL2000 DNA Marker (TaKaRa Bio); lane 1 – DNA fragment of PCR amplification
Fig. 2
The standard curve for calculating Brucella concentration according to CT of qPCR based on the template of recombinant standard plasmid pMD-18T-BCSP31
Fig. 3
Optimisation of PMA treatment conditions. A – Effect of different exposure time on qPCR amplification; B – Different concentrations of PMA treating dead bacteria; C – Different concentrations of PMA treating viable bacteria; * – P < 0.05; Yellow columns – optimal PMA treatment time of 10 min; Yellow columns with ☆ – optimal PMA treatment concentration of 15 μg/mL; × – not detected
Fig. 4
The sensitivity of detecting B. suis S2 strain. A – sensitivity by the PMA-qPCR; B – sensitivity by the conventional PCR, comprising M – DL2000 DNA Marker; lanes 1–10 – 108 – 10-1 CFU/mL
Fig. 5
Analysis of the specificity of PMA-qPCR. A – amplification plot; B – melting curves of the qPCR amplification product; C – agarose gel electrophoresis of different Brucella species detected by the normal PCR, comprising M – DL5000 DNA Marker; lane 1 – B. suis S2; lane 2 – B. abortus 2308; lane 3 – B. abortus A19; lane 4 – B. melitensis M5; lane 5 – B. melitensis 16M; and lane 6 – B. ovis; D – agarose gel electrophoresis of species other than Brucella amplified by the conventional PCR, comprising M – DL2000 DNA Marker; lane 1 – B. suis S2; lane 2 – E. coli; lane 3 – S. typhimurium; lane 4 – Y. enterocolitica; lane 5 – V. parahaemolyticus; and lane 6 – RNase-free water
Fig. 6
Analysis of different ratios of viable to dead B. suis S2 strain using the PMA-qPCR method and the qPCR method. * – P < 0.05
Fig. 7
Determination of the amount of the viable B. suis S2 strain by PMA-qPCR and plate counting methods. Pure bacterial liquid – B. suis cultured in TSB; A – B. suis harbouring in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells infected with 1.28 × 1012 CFU/mL of B. suis S2 strain; B – B. suis harbouring in mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells infected with 0.64 × 1012 CFU/mL of B. suis S2 strain; * P < 0.05
Coefficient of variation for intra- and inter-batch experiments
DNA dilution times
Intra-assay
Inter-assay
Average value of CT
SD
CV
Average value of CT
SD
CV
10
7
17.55277
0.13205
0.75
17.95203
0.26862
1.50
10
6
21.9137
0.26965
1.23
22.35123
0.45614
2.04
10
5
23.80697
0.15085
0.63
23.82857
0.43607
1.83
Vorschau