[Catlaks, G. (2003). Curriculum development and teacher training in Latvia. In Teacher training and curriculum reform in the South Caucasus religion. From vision to practice. Retrieved April 15, 2013, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/regworkshops/finrep_pdf/finrep_tbilisi_03.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheung, D., & H. Wong. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum design. The Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225–48.10.1080/09585170210136868]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 257–293.10.3102/00028312043002257]Search in Google Scholar
[Drake, C., & Sherin. M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00351.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Eesti põhi – ja keskhariduse riiklik õppekava [Estonian national curriculum for basic and secondary education]. (1996). Retrieved July 4, 2014, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/29725]Search in Google Scholar
[Eash, M. J. (1991). Curriculum components. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 67–69). Oxford: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Egelund, N. (2005). Educational assessment in Danish schools. Assessment in Education, 12(2), 203–212.10.1080/09695940500143886]Search in Google Scholar
[Ennis, C. D., & Hooper, L. M. (1988). Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 277–280.10.1080/0022027880200308]Search in Google Scholar
[Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency P9 Eurydice. (2007). School autonomy in Europe. Policies and measures. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/090EN.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraenkel, R. F., & Wallen, E. N. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). Boston: McGrow-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as a curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3(3), 32–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the modified-curriculum orientations questionnaire. The Curriculum Journal, 20(2), 103–120.10.1080/09585170902948798]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlsen, G. E. (2000). Decentralized centralism: Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 525–538.10.1080/026809300750001676]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, K. J. (2010). School-based curriculum development for new times: A comparative analysis. In E. H. F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874]Search in Google Scholar
[Krull, E., & Trasberg, K. (2007). Changes in Estonian general education from the collapse of the Soviet Union to EU entry. Tartu: Tartu University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lam, C. C., & Yeung, S. S. Y. (2010). School-based curriculum development in Hong-Kong: An arduous journey. In E. H. F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 61–82). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, E. H. F., Galton, M., & Wan, S. W. Y. (2007). Developing curriculum leadership in schools: Hong Kong perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 143–159.10.1080/13598660701268569]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets – and then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697.10.1080/0268093022000032328]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundahl, L. (2005). A matter of self-governance and control. The reconstruction of Swedish education policy: 1980–2003. European Education, 37(1), 10–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[McNeil, J. D. (1992). Curriculum organization. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (Vol 1., pp. 273–279). New York: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24.10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368.10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsen, S. (2010). Moving towards an educational policy for inclusion? Main reform stages in the development of the Norwegian unitary school system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(5), 479–497.10.1080/13603110802632217]Search in Google Scholar
[Olek, H. (1998). Educational research in Central and Eastern Europe: A diverging tradition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 78–93.10.1076/edre.4.1.78.13011]Search in Google Scholar
[Osei, G. M., & Brock, C. (2006). Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Ghana. Journal of Education Policy, 21(4), 437–458.10.1080/02680930600731880]Search in Google Scholar
[Polyzoi, E., & Cerna, M. (2001). A dynamic model of forces affecting the implementation of educational change in the Czech Republic. Comparative Education Review, 45(1), 64–84.10.1086/447645]Search in Google Scholar
[Priestley, M., Edwards, R., & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Põhikooli ja gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for basic schools and gymnasia]. (2002). Retrieved July 4, 2014, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/174787]Search in Google Scholar
[Põhikooli riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for basic schools]. (2011). Retrieved September 3, 2013, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schubert, W. H, Hansen, D. T., Wulf, C., Kliebard, H. M., Lawton, D., Connell, W. F., & Zhang, L. (1998). Curriculum history: National profiles. In T. Husén, T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), Education: The complete encyclopedia. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum developers, curriculum makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184.10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Shkedi, A. (1998). Can the curriculum guide both emancipate and educate teachers? Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 209–229.10.1111/0362-6784.00085]Search in Google Scholar
[Shkedi, A. (2006). Curriculum and teachers: An encounter of languages and literatures. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 719–735.10.1080/00220270500221802]Search in Google Scholar
[Shriner, M., Schlee, B. M., & Libler, R. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and beliefs regarding curriculum integration. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(1), 51–62.10.1007/BF03216913]Search in Google Scholar
[Silberstein, M., & Ben-Peretz, M. (1987). The concept of teacher autonomy in curriculum materials: An operative interpretation. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(1), 29–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sivesind, K. (2013). Mixed images and merging semantics in European curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 52–66.10.1080/00220272.2012.757807]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad dscourse on accountability – explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119–152.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development. Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Unt, I., & Läänemets U. (Eds.). (1992). Põhikooli õppekava [Curriculum for basic schools]. Tallinn: Eesti Hariduse Arenduskeskus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Unt, I., & Läänemets U. (Eds). (1993). Keskkooli õppekava [Curriculum for secondary schools]. Tallinn: Eesti Hariduse Arenduskeskus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2007). The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 156–171.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122.10.1080/00220270601078259]Search in Google Scholar
[Vulliamy, G., Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R., & Webb, R. (1997). Teacher identity and curriculum change: A comparative case-study analysis of small schools in England and Finland. Comparative Education, 33(1), 97–115.10.1080/03050069728668]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357–381.10.1080/00220272.2011.563447]Search in Google Scholar
[Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58–80.10.1080/00220272.2013.812681]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, R. M. (1997). Questionnaires. In John P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 422–427). New York: Pergamon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wong, J. (2006). Control and professional development: Are teachers being deskilled or reskilled within the context of decentralization? Educational Studies, 32(1), 17–37.10.1080/03055690500415910]Search in Google Scholar
[Wong, J. (2008). How does the new emphasis on managerialism in education redefine teacher professionalism? A case study in Guangdong Province of China. Educational Review, 60(3), 267–282.10.1080/00131910802195869]Search in Google Scholar
[Zogla, I. (2001). Democratisation in Latvian Education: Teachers’ attitudinal change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 143–156.10.1080/02619760120095543]Search in Google Scholar