[Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 79-97.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Barandiaran, X., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17 (5), 367-386.10.1177/1059712309343819]Search in Google Scholar
[Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). The mindreading system: New directions for research. Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 724-750.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183, 99-101.10.1126/science.183.4120.99]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. C. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jaegher, H. (2006). Social interaction rhythm and participatory sense-making. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18 (2), 535-542.10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.007]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E.A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (4), 485-507.10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 441 - 447.10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 97-125.10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Overcoming autopoiesis: An enactive detour on the way from life to society. Advanced Series in Management, 6, 43-68.10.1108/S1877-6361(2009)0000006004]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48 (3-4), 329-354.10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Froese, T., Virgo, N., & Izquierdo, E. (2007). Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal. In F. Almeida e Costa et al. (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 455-464). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 439-463.10.1007/s11097-009-9140-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 205-235.10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13 (3), 436-468.10.1075/is.13.3.06fro]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sensemaking and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 465-486.10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 83-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher, S. (2008). Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3), 163-73.10.1080/13869790802239227]Search in Google Scholar
[Gratier, M. (2003). Expressive timing and interactional synchrony between mothers and infants: Cultural similarities, cultural differences, and the immigration experience. Cognitive Development, 18, 553-554.10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gratier, M. (2008). Les rythmes de l’intersubjectivité. Spirale, 4, 47-57.10.3917/spi.044.0047]Search in Google Scholar
[Gratier, M., & Apter-Danon, G. (2009). The musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant vocal interaction. In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality: narratives of expressive gesture and being human. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gratier, M., & Magnier, J. (2012). Sense and synchrony: Infant communication and musical improvisation. Intermédialités: Histoire et Théorie des Arts, des Lettres et des Techniques, 19, 45-64.10.7202/1012655ar]Search in Google Scholar
[Hane, A. A., Feldstein, S., & Dernetz, V. H. (2003). The relation between coordinated interpersonal timing and maternal sensitivity with four-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (5), 525-539. 10.1023/A:1025494200272]Search in Google Scholar
[Heidegger, M. (1927). Etre et temps. Trad. François Vezin. Paris: Gallimard.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. London: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Husserl, E. (1952). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures. Tome 2: Recherches phénoménologiques pour la constitution. Trad. Escoubas, E. Paris: PUF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L., & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66 (2), i-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaddouch, R., & Miravète, S. (2012). Des mimes et des murs. Paris: éditions Gruppen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaddouch, I., & Laroche, J. (2014). Trois études de cas d’improvisations. Gruppen, 8, 42-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrom, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kostrubiec, V., Zanone, P. G., Fuchs, A., & Kelso, J. S. (2012). Beyond the blank slate: Routes to learning new coordination patterns depend on the intrinsic dynamics of the learner - experimental evidence and theoretical model. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00222]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). On the oscillatory basis of movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18 (63), 9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Coordination dynamics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems sciences (pp. 1537-1564). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso, J. A. S., Dumas, G., & Tognoli, E. (2012). Outline of a general theory of behavior and brain coordination. Neural Networks, 37, 120-131.10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 100-125.10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time- varying events. Psychological Review, 106 (1), 119.10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119]Search in Google Scholar
[Laroche, J. (2013). Le processus d’interaction comme attracteur dans la coordination temporelle entre les personnes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Metz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenay, C. (2010). “It’s so touching”: Emotional value in distal contact. International Journal of Design, 4 (2), 14-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenay, C., Stewart, J., Rohde, M., & Amar, A. A. (2011). You never fail to surprise me: The hallmark of the other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing. Interaction Studies, 12 (3), 373-396.10.1075/is.12.3.01len]Search in Google Scholar
[Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2012). Minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00098]Search in Google Scholar
[Malloch, S. N. (1999). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Musicae Scientiae. Special issue 1999-2000, 29-57.10.1177/10298649000030S104]Search in Google Scholar
[Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGann, M. (2010). Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17 (1-2), p. 1-2. ]Search in Google Scholar
[McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 417-437.10.1007/s11097-009-9141-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulations of interactions between two- month-olds and their mothers. In T. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social Perception in Infants, (pp. 177-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morowitz, H. J. (1979). Energy Flow in Biology. Woodbridge : OxBow Press. Nijholt, A., Reidsma, D., van Welbergen, H., op den Akker, H. J. A., & Ruttkay, Z.]Search in Google Scholar
[M. (2008). Mutually coordinated anticipatory multimodal interaction. In Nonverbal features of human-human and human-machine interaction. Lecture notes in computer science, 5042, 73- 93. Berlin: Springer Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oullier, O., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Social coordination from the perspective of coordination dynamics. In R. Meyers (Ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 8198- 8212). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Shockley, K. (2008). Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics, and communication. In G. Knoblich (Ed.), Embodied communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York: Hyperion.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 407-427.10.1007/s11097-005-9003-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Margaret Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: the beginning of interpersonal communication, Cambridge: CUP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trevarthen, C. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue 1999-2000, 155- 215.10.1177/10298649000030S109]Search in Google Scholar
[Trevarthen, C. (2011). What is it like to be a person who knows nothing? Defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being. Infant and Child Development, 20 (1), 119- 135.10.1002/icd.689]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, F. J. (1988). Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Paris: Seuil.]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, F. J. (1996). The specious present. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. J. Pachoud & M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and cognition, 34 (1), 72-87.10.1006/brcg.1997.0907]Search in Google Scholar
[Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar