Enacting teaching and learning in the interaction process: “Keys” for developing skills in piano lessons through four-hand improvisations

Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 79-97.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Barandiaran, X., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17 (5), 367-386.10.1177/1059712309343819Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). The mindreading system: New directions for research. Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 724-750.Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183, 99-101.10.1126/science.183.4120.99Search in Google Scholar

Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. C. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43-96.Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H. (2006). Social interaction rhythm and participatory sense-making. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex.Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18 (2), 535-542.10.1016/j.concog.2008.10.007Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E.A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (4), 485-507.10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 441 - 447.10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 97-125.10.1007/s11097-005-9002-ySearch in Google Scholar

Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Overcoming autopoiesis: An enactive detour on the way from life to society. Advanced Series in Management, 6, 43-68.10.1108/S1877-6361(2009)0000006004Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48 (3-4), 329-354.10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.xSearch in Google Scholar

Froese, T., Virgo, N., & Izquierdo, E. (2007). Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal. In F. Almeida e Costa et al. (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 455-464). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 439-463.10.1007/s11097-009-9140-8Search in Google Scholar

Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 205-235.10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2Search in Google Scholar

Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13 (3), 436-468.10.1075/is.13.3.06froSearch in Google Scholar

Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sensemaking and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 465-486.10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 83-108.Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2008). Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3), 163-73.10.1080/13869790802239227Search in Google Scholar

Gratier, M. (2003). Expressive timing and interactional synchrony between mothers and infants: Cultural similarities, cultural differences, and the immigration experience. Cognitive Development, 18, 553-554.10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.009Search in Google Scholar

Gratier, M. (2008). Les rythmes de l’intersubjectivité. Spirale, 4, 47-57.10.3917/spi.044.0047Search in Google Scholar

Gratier, M., & Apter-Danon, G. (2009). The musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant vocal interaction. In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality: narratives of expressive gesture and being human. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gratier, M., & Magnier, J. (2012). Sense and synchrony: Infant communication and musical improvisation. Intermédialités: Histoire et Théorie des Arts, des Lettres et des Techniques, 19, 45-64.10.7202/1012655arSearch in Google Scholar

Hane, A. A., Feldstein, S., & Dernetz, V. H. (2003). The relation between coordinated interpersonal timing and maternal sensitivity with four-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (5), 525-539. 10.1023/A:1025494200272Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1927). Etre et temps. Trad. François Vezin. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1952). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures. Tome 2: Recherches phénoménologiques pour la constitution. Trad. Escoubas, E. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L., & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66 (2), i-149.Search in Google Scholar

Kaddouch, R., & Miravète, S. (2012). Des mimes et des murs. Paris: éditions Gruppen.Search in Google Scholar

Kaddouch, I., & Laroche, J. (2014). Trois études de cas d’improvisations. Gruppen, 8, 42-59.Search in Google Scholar

Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrom, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Kostrubiec, V., Zanone, P. G., Fuchs, A., & Kelso, J. S. (2012). Beyond the blank slate: Routes to learning new coordination patterns depend on the intrinsic dynamics of the learner - experimental evidence and theoretical model. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00222Search in Google Scholar

Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). On the oscillatory basis of movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18 (63), 9.Search in Google Scholar

Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Coordination dynamics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems sciences (pp. 1537-1564). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kelso, J. A. S., Dumas, G., & Tognoli, E. (2012). Outline of a general theory of behavior and brain coordination. Neural Networks, 37, 120-131.10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 100-125.10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6Search in Google Scholar

Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time- varying events. Psychological Review, 106 (1), 119.10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119Search in Google Scholar

Laroche, J. (2013). Le processus d’interaction comme attracteur dans la coordination temporelle entre les personnes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Metz.Search in Google Scholar

Lenay, C. (2010). “It’s so touching”: Emotional value in distal contact. International Journal of Design, 4 (2), 14-26.Search in Google Scholar

Lenay, C., Stewart, J., Rohde, M., & Amar, A. A. (2011). You never fail to surprise me: The hallmark of the other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing. Interaction Studies, 12 (3), 373-396.10.1075/is.12.3.01lenSearch in Google Scholar

Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2012). Minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00098Search in Google Scholar

Malloch, S. N. (1999). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Musicae Scientiae. Special issue 1999-2000, 29-57.10.1177/10298649000030S104Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McGann, M. (2010). Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17 (1-2), p. 1-2. Search in Google Scholar

McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 417-437.10.1007/s11097-009-9141-7Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulations of interactions between two- month-olds and their mothers. In T. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social Perception in Infants, (pp. 177-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Morowitz, H. J. (1979). Energy Flow in Biology. Woodbridge : OxBow Press. Nijholt, A., Reidsma, D., van Welbergen, H., op den Akker, H. J. A., & Ruttkay, Z.Search in Google Scholar

M. (2008). Mutually coordinated anticipatory multimodal interaction. In Nonverbal features of human-human and human-machine interaction. Lecture notes in computer science, 5042, 73- 93. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Oullier, O., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Social coordination from the perspective of coordination dynamics. In R. Meyers (Ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 8198- 8212). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Shockley, K. (2008). Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics, and communication. In G. Knoblich (Ed.), Embodied communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York: Hyperion.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 407-427.10.1007/s11097-005-9003-xSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Margaret Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: the beginning of interpersonal communication, Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue 1999-2000, 155- 215.10.1177/10298649000030S109Search in Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (2011). What is it like to be a person who knows nothing? Defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being. Infant and Child Development, 20 (1), 119- 135.10.1002/icd.689Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F. J. (1988). Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F. J. (1996). The specious present. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. J. Pachoud & M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and cognition, 34 (1), 72-87.10.1006/brcg.1997.0907Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar