The Association between Researchers’ Conceptions of Research and Their Strategic Research Agendas

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Costa, F.D. (2018). The effects of gender, age, and academic rank on research diversification. Scientometrics, 114(2), 373–387.AbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.CostaF.D.2018The effects of gender, age, and academic rank on research diversificationScientometrics114237338710.1007/s11192-017-2529-1Search in Google Scholar

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.BecherT.TrowlerP.2001Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplinesBuckinghamOpen University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Bentley, P.J. (2014). Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities. Scientometrics, 102, 865–883.BentleyP.J.2014Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universitiesScientometrics10286588310.1007/s11192-014-1430-4Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1999). The specificity of the scientific field. The Science Studies Reader. Ed. Biagioli, M. New York: Routledge, 31–50.BourdieuP.1999The specificity of the scientific fieldThe Science Studies ReaderEd.BiagioliM.New YorkRoutledge3150Search in Google Scholar

Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402.BozemanB.GaughanM.2011How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchersResearch Policy40101393140210.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–285.BrewA.2001Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic studyStudies in Higher Education2627128510.4324/9780203464045_chapter_13Search in Google Scholar

Brew, A., Boud, D., Namgung, S.U., Lucas, L., & Crawford, K. (2016). Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research. Higher Education, 71, 681–697.BrewA.BoudD.NamgungS.U.LucasL.CrawfordK.2016Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of researchHigher Education7168169710.1007/s10734-015-9930-6Search in Google Scholar

Coate, K., & Howson, C.K. (2016). Indicators of esteem: Gender and prestige in academic work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 567–585.CoateK.HowsonC.K.2016Indicators of esteem: Gender and prestige in academic workBritish Journal of Sociology of Education37456758510.1080/01425692.2014.955082Search in Google Scholar

Corry, M., Porter, S., & McKenna, H. (2019). The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 20(1), e12230.CorryM.PorterS.McKennaH.2019The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing researchNursing Philosophy201e1223010.1111/nup.1223030431226Search in Google Scholar

Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks? Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 809–825.EbadiA.SchiffauerovaA.2015How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?Journal of Informetrics9480982510.1016/j.joi.2015.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Foster, J.G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J.A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875–908.FosterJ.G.RzhetskyA.EvansJ.A.2015Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategiesAmerican Sociological Review80587590810.1177/0003122415601618Search in Google Scholar

Fuller, S. (2012). Social epistemology: A quarter-century itinerary. Social Epistemology, 26, 267–283.FullerS.2012Social epistemology: A quarter-century itinerarySocial Epistemology2626728310.1080/02691728.2012.714415Search in Google Scholar

Gaskin, J. (2016). Stats Tool Package. Retrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskinJ.2016Stats Tool PackageRetrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comSearch in Google Scholar

Gaughan, M. (2009). Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 117–124.GaughanM.2009Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectoriesResearch Evaluation18211712410.3152/095820209X441781Search in Google Scholar

Gorman, S.E., & Gorman, J.M. (2017). Denying to the grave: Why we ignore the facts that will save us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.GormanS.E.GormanJ.M.2017Denying to the grave: Why we ignore the facts that will save usOxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780199396603.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2007). Multivariate data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing.HairJ.F.BlackW.C.BabinB.J.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L.2007Multivariate data analysisNew YorkMcGraw Hill PublishingSearch in Google Scholar

Hemmings, B. (2012). Sources of research confidence for early career academics: A qualitative study. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 171–184.HemmingsB.2012Sources of research confidence for early career academics: A qualitative studyHigher Education Research & Development31217118410.1080/07294360.2011.559198Search in Google Scholar

Hoolohan, C., McLachlan, C., & Larkin, A. (2019). ‘Aha’ moments in the water-energy-food nexus: A new morphological scenario method to accelerate sustainable transformation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119712HoolohanC.McLachlanC.LarkinA.2019‘Aha’ moments in the water-energy-food nexus: A new morphological scenario method to accelerate sustainable transformationTechnological Forecasting and Social Change14811971210.1016/j.techfore.2019.119712Search in Google Scholar

Horta, H., Jung, J., & Santos, J.M. (2019). Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systems. Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/s41307-019-00173-xHortaH.JungJ.SantosJ.M.2019Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systemsHigher Education Policy10.1057/s41307-019-00173-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2016). An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: The multi-dimensional research agendas inventory. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1243–1265. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4HortaH.SantosJ.M.2016An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: The multi-dimensional research agendas inventoryScientometrics10831243126510.1007/s11192-016-2012-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2019a). Organisational factors and academic research agendas: An analysis of academics in the social sciences. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351HortaH.SantosJ.M.2019aOrganisational factors and academic research agendas: An analysis of academics in the social sciencesStudies in Higher Education10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2019b). The development of a new instrument to measure research agendas (poster). ISSI 2019, Rome, Italy.HortaH.SantosJ.M.2019bThe development of a new instrument to measure research agendas (poster)ISSI 2019Rome, ItalySearch in Google Scholar

Horta, H. & Santos, J.M. (2020) The multidimensional research agendas inventory—revised (MDRAI-R): Factors shaping researchers’ research agendas in all fields of knowledge. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 60–93.HortaH.SantosJ.M.2020The multidimensional research agendas inventory—revised (MDRAI-R): Factors shaping researchers’ research agendas in all fields of knowledgeQuantitative Science Studies11609310.1162/qss_a_00017Search in Google Scholar

Huang, F., Daizen, T., & Kim, Y. (2019). Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national survey. International Journal of Educational Development, 71, 102103.HuangF.DaizenT.KimY.2019Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national surveyInternational Journal of Educational Development7110210310.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102103Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, A.J., Hudson, T.D., Pasque, P.A., & Ampaw, F.D. (2017). Understanding how lifelong learning shapes the career trajectories of women with STEM doctorates: The life experiences and role negotiations (LEARN) model. The Review of Higher Education, 40(4), 477–507.JaegerA.J.HudsonT.D.PasqueP.A.AmpawF.D.2017Understanding how lifelong learning shapes the career trajectories of women with STEM doctorates: The life experiences and role negotiations (LEARN) modelThe Review of Higher Education40447750710.1353/rhe.2017.0019Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen, M., Dyba, T., Liestol, K., & Sjoberg, D.I.K. (2016). Incorrect results in software engineering experiments: How to improve research practices. Journal of Systems and Software, 116, 133–145.JorgensenM.DybaT.LiestolK.SjobergD.I.K.2016Incorrect results in software engineering experiments: How to improve research practicesJournal of Systems and Software11613314510.1016/j.jss.2015.03.065Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, J. & Baldwin, S. (2000). Four editorial proposals to improve social sciences research and publication. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 13(2,3), 109–116.JosephJ.BaldwinS.2000Four editorial proposals to improve social sciences research and publicationInternational Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine132,3109116Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, A. & Leiner, L. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28.KaiserA.LeinerL.2012Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative researchJournal of Management Inquiry211142810.1177/1056492611411923Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T.S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.KuhnT.S.2012The structure of scientific revolutionsChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kuzhabekova, A., & Lee, J.T. (2020). Internationalization and local research capacity strengthening: Factors affecting knowledge sharing between international and local faculty in Kazakhstan. European Education. doi:10.1080/10564934.2020.1723422KuzhabekovaA.LeeJ.T.2020Internationalization and local research capacity strengthening: Factors affecting knowledge sharing between international and local faculty in KazakhstanEuropean Education10.1080/10564934.2020.1723422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kwiek, M. (2019). Changing European academics: A comparative study of social stratification, work patterns and research productivity. Abingdon: Routledge.KwiekM.2019Changing European academics: A comparative study of social stratification, work patterns and research productivityAbingdonRoutledge10.4324/9781351182041Search in Google Scholar

Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71, 379–397.KwiekM.2016The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countriesHigher Education7137939710.1007/s10734-015-9910-xSearch in Google Scholar

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.LatourB.WoolgarS.2013Laboratory life: The construction of scientific factsPrincetonPrinceton University Press10.2307/j.ctt32bbxcSearch in Google Scholar

Lyall, C. (2019). Being an interdisciplinary academic: How institutions shape university careers. Cham: Palgrave.LyallC.2019Being an interdisciplinary academic: How institutions shape university careersChamPalgrave10.1007/978-3-030-18659-3Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, J.H., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugksch, R.C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 225–244.MeyerJ.H.ShanahanM.P.LaugkschR.C.2005Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysisScandinavian Journal of Educational Research49322524410.1080/00313830500109535Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, J.H., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugksch, R.C. (2007). Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 415–433.MeyerJ.H.ShanahanM.P.LaugkschR.C.2007Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variationScandinavian Journal of Educational Research51441543310.1080/00313830701485627Search in Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. London: Tavistock publications.MilgramS.1974Obedience to authority: An experimental viewLondonTavistock publicationsSearch in Google Scholar

Nairn, S. (2019). Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussion. Nursing Philosophy, 20(4), e12260.NairnS.2019Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussionNursing Philosophy204e1226010.1111/nup.1226031314182Search in Google Scholar

Nestle, M. (2016). Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: Science or marketing? JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(1), 13–14. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6667NestleM.2016Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: Science or marketing?JAMA Internal Medicine1761131410.1001/jamainternmed.2015.666726595855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, I. (2020). Social aspect of scientific knowledge. Synthese, 197, 447–468.NiiniluotoI.2020Social aspect of scientific knowledgeSynthese19744746810.1007/s11229-018-1868-7Search in Google Scholar

Oleksiyenko, A., & Ruan, N. (2019). Intellectual leadership and academic communities: Issues for discussion and research. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 406–418.OleksiyenkoA.RuanN.2019Intellectual leadership and academic communities: Issues for discussion and researchHigher Education Quarterly73440641810.1111/hequ.12199Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150.PearsonM.BrewA.2002Research training and supervision developmentStudies in Higher Education2713515010.1080/03075070220119986cSearch in Google Scholar

Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.PopperK.2005The logic of scientific discoveryNew YorkRoutledge10.4324/9780203994627Search in Google Scholar

Ramos, A.M.G., Palacin, F.F., & Márquez, M.M. (2015). Do men and women perform academic work differently? Tertiary Education and Management, 21(4), 263–276.RamosA.M.G.PalacinF.F.MárquezM.M.2015Do men and women perform academic work differently?Tertiary Education and Management21426327610.1080/13583883.2015.1065904Search in Google Scholar

Santos, J.M., & Horta, H. (2018). The research agenda setting of higher education researchers. Higher Education, 76(4), 649–668. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0230-9SantosJ.M.HortaH.2018The research agenda setting of higher education researchersHigher Education76464966810.1007/s10734-018-0230-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stehr, N., & Grundmann, R. (2011). Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. Abingdon: Routledge.StehrN.GrundmannR.2011Experts: The knowledge and power of expertiseAbingdonRoutledge10.4324/9780203829646Search in Google Scholar

Ursin, J., Vahasantanen, K., McAlpine, L., & Hokka, P. (2020). Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(3), 311–325.UrsinJ.VahasantanenK.McAlpineL.HokkaP.2020Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic workJournal of Further and Higher Education44331132510.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971Search in Google Scholar

Vaesen, K., & Katzav, J. (2017). How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers? PLoS ONE, 12(9), e0183967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183967VaesenK.KatzavJ.2017How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?PLoS ONE129e0183967https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.018396710.1371/journal.pone.0183967559085828886054Search in Google Scholar

Wynn, J. (2017). Citizen science in the digital age: Rhetoric, science, and public engagement. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.WynnJ.2017Citizen science in the digital age: Rhetoric, science, and public engagementTuscaloosaThe University of Alabama PressSearch in Google Scholar

Ying, Q.F., Venkatramanan, S., & Chiu, D.M. (2015). Modeling and analysis of scholar mobility on scientific landscape. WWW ’15 Companion. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web: 609–614. ACM.YingQ.F.VenkatramananS.ChiuD.M.2015Modeling and analysis of scholar mobility on scientific landscape. WWW ’15 CompanionInProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web: 609–614ACM10.1145/2740908.2741737Search in Google Scholar

Young, M. (2015). Competitive funding, citation regimes, and the diminishment of breakthrough research. Higher Education, 69, 421–434.YoungM.2015Competitive funding, citation regimes, and the diminishment of breakthrough researchHigher Education6942143410.1007/s10734-014-9783-4Search in Google Scholar