This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Costa, F.D. (2018). The effects of gender, age, and academic rank on research diversification. Scientometrics, 114(2), 373–387.AbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.CostaF.D.2018The effects of gender, age, and academic rank on research diversification114237338710.1007/s11192-017-2529-1Search in Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.BecherT.TrowlerP.2001BuckinghamOpen University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bentley, P.J. (2014). Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities. Scientometrics, 102, 865–883.BentleyP.J.2014Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities10286588310.1007/s11192-014-1430-4Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1999). The specificity of the scientific field. The Science Studies Reader. Ed. Biagioli, M. New York: Routledge, 31–50.BourdieuP.1999The specificity of the scientific fieldEd.BiagioliM.New YorkRoutledge3150Search in Google Scholar
Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402.BozemanB.GaughanM.2011How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers40101393140210.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–285.BrewA.2001Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study2627128510.4324/9780203464045_chapter_13Search in Google Scholar
Brew, A., Boud, D., Namgung, S.U., Lucas, L., & Crawford, K. (2016). Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research. Higher Education, 71, 681–697.BrewA.BoudD.NamgungS.U.LucasL.CrawfordK.2016Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research7168169710.1007/s10734-015-9930-6Search in Google Scholar
Coate, K., & Howson, C.K. (2016). Indicators of esteem: Gender and prestige in academic work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 567–585.CoateK.HowsonC.K.2016Indicators of esteem: Gender and prestige in academic work37456758510.1080/01425692.2014.955082Search in Google Scholar
Corry, M., Porter, S., & McKenna, H. (2019). The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 20(1), e12230.CorryM.PorterS.McKennaH.2019The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research201e1223010.1111/nup.1223030431226Search in Google Scholar
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks? Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 809–825.EbadiA.SchiffauerovaA.2015How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?9480982510.1016/j.joi.2015.08.002Search in Google Scholar
Foster, J.G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J.A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875–908.FosterJ.G.RzhetskyA.EvansJ.A.2015Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies80587590810.1177/0003122415601618Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2012). Social epistemology: A quarter-century itinerary. Social Epistemology, 26, 267–283.FullerS.2012Social epistemology: A quarter-century itinerary2626728310.1080/02691728.2012.714415Search in Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. (2016). Stats Tool Package. Retrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskinJ.2016Retrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comSearch in Google Scholar
Gaughan, M. (2009). Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 117–124.GaughanM.2009Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories18211712410.3152/095820209X441781Search in Google Scholar
Gorman, S.E., & Gorman, J.M. (2017). Denying to the grave: Why we ignore the facts that will save us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.GormanS.E.GormanJ.M.2017OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780199396603.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2007). Multivariate data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing.HairJ.F.BlackW.C.BabinB.J.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L.2007New YorkMcGraw Hill PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Hemmings, B. (2012). Sources of research confidence for early career academics: A qualitative study. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 171–184.HemmingsB.2012Sources of research confidence for early career academics: A qualitative study31217118410.1080/07294360.2011.559198Search in Google Scholar
Hoolohan, C., McLachlan, C., & Larkin, A. (2019). ‘Aha’ moments in the water-energy-food nexus: A new morphological scenario method to accelerate sustainable transformation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119712HoolohanC.McLachlanC.LarkinA.2019‘Aha’ moments in the water-energy-food nexus: A new morphological scenario method to accelerate sustainable transformation14811971210.1016/j.techfore.2019.119712Search in Google Scholar
Horta, H., Jung, J., & Santos, J.M. (2019). Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systems. Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/s41307-019-00173-xHortaH.JungJ.SantosJ.M.2019Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systems10.1057/s41307-019-00173-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2016). An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: The multi-dimensional research agendas inventory. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1243–1265. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4HortaH.SantosJ.M.2016An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: The multi-dimensional research agendas inventory10831243126510.1007/s11192-016-2012-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2019a). Organisational factors and academic research agendas: An analysis of academics in the social sciences. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351HortaH.SantosJ.M.2019aOrganisational factors and academic research agendas: An analysis of academics in the social sciences10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Horta, H., & Santos, J.M. (2019b). The development of a new instrument to measure research agendas (poster). ISSI 2019, Rome, Italy.HortaH.SantosJ.M.2019bISSI 2019Rome, ItalySearch in Google Scholar
Horta, H. & Santos, J.M. (2020) The multidimensional research agendas inventory—revised (MDRAI-R): Factors shaping researchers’ research agendas in all fields of knowledge. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 60–93.HortaH.SantosJ.M.2020The multidimensional research agendas inventory—revised (MDRAI-R): Factors shaping researchers’ research agendas in all fields of knowledge11609310.1162/qss_a_00017Search in Google Scholar
Huang, F., Daizen, T., & Kim, Y. (2019). Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national survey. International Journal of Educational Development, 71, 102103.HuangF.DaizenT.KimY.2019Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national survey7110210310.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102103Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, A.J., Hudson, T.D., Pasque, P.A., & Ampaw, F.D. (2017). Understanding how lifelong learning shapes the career trajectories of women with STEM doctorates: The life experiences and role negotiations (LEARN) model. The Review of Higher Education, 40(4), 477–507.JaegerA.J.HudsonT.D.PasqueP.A.AmpawF.D.2017Understanding how lifelong learning shapes the career trajectories of women with STEM doctorates: The life experiences and role negotiations (LEARN) model40447750710.1353/rhe.2017.0019Search in Google Scholar
Jorgensen, M., Dyba, T., Liestol, K., & Sjoberg, D.I.K. (2016). Incorrect results in software engineering experiments: How to improve research practices. Journal of Systems and Software, 116, 133–145.JorgensenM.DybaT.LiestolK.SjobergD.I.K.2016Incorrect results in software engineering experiments: How to improve research practices11613314510.1016/j.jss.2015.03.065Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, J. & Baldwin, S. (2000). Four editorial proposals to improve social sciences research and publication. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 13(2,3), 109–116.JosephJ.BaldwinS.2000Four editorial proposals to improve social sciences research and publication132,3109116Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, A. & Leiner, L. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28.KaiserA.LeinerL.2012Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research211142810.1177/1056492611411923Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.KuhnT.S.2012ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kuzhabekova, A., & Lee, J.T. (2020). Internationalization and local research capacity strengthening: Factors affecting knowledge sharing between international and local faculty in Kazakhstan. European Education. doi:10.1080/10564934.2020.1723422KuzhabekovaA.LeeJ.T.2020Internationalization and local research capacity strengthening: Factors affecting knowledge sharing between international and local faculty in Kazakhstan10.1080/10564934.2020.1723422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kwiek, M. (2019). Changing European academics: A comparative study of social stratification, work patterns and research productivity. Abingdon: Routledge.KwiekM.2019AbingdonRoutledge10.4324/9781351182041Search in Google Scholar
Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71, 379–397.KwiekM.2016The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries7137939710.1007/s10734-015-9910-xSearch in Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.LatourB.WoolgarS.2013PrincetonPrinceton University Press10.2307/j.ctt32bbxcSearch in Google Scholar
Lyall, C. (2019). Being an interdisciplinary academic: How institutions shape university careers. Cham: Palgrave.LyallC.2019ChamPalgrave10.1007/978-3-030-18659-3Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, J.H., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugksch, R.C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 225–244.MeyerJ.H.ShanahanM.P.LaugkschR.C.2005Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis49322524410.1080/00313830500109535Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, J.H., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugksch, R.C. (2007). Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 415–433.MeyerJ.H.ShanahanM.P.LaugkschR.C.2007Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation51441543310.1080/00313830701485627Search in Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. London: Tavistock publications.MilgramS.1974LondonTavistock publicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Nairn, S. (2019). Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussion. Nursing Philosophy, 20(4), e12260.NairnS.2019Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussion204e1226010.1111/nup.1226031314182Search in Google Scholar
Nestle, M. (2016). Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: Science or marketing? JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(1), 13–14. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6667NestleM.2016Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: Science or marketing?1761131410.1001/jamainternmed.2015.666726595855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (2020). Social aspect of scientific knowledge. Synthese, 197, 447–468.NiiniluotoI.2020Social aspect of scientific knowledge19744746810.1007/s11229-018-1868-7Search in Google Scholar
Oleksiyenko, A., & Ruan, N. (2019). Intellectual leadership and academic communities: Issues for discussion and research. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 406–418.OleksiyenkoA.RuanN.2019Intellectual leadership and academic communities: Issues for discussion and research73440641810.1111/hequ.12199Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150.PearsonM.BrewA.2002Research training and supervision development2713515010.1080/03075070220119986cSearch in Google Scholar
Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.PopperK.2005New YorkRoutledge10.4324/9780203994627Search in Google Scholar
Ramos, A.M.G., Palacin, F.F., & Márquez, M.M. (2015). Do men and women perform academic work differently? Tertiary Education and Management, 21(4), 263–276.RamosA.M.G.PalacinF.F.MárquezM.M.2015Do men and women perform academic work differently?21426327610.1080/13583883.2015.1065904Search in Google Scholar
Santos, J.M., & Horta, H. (2018). The research agenda setting of higher education researchers. Higher Education, 76(4), 649–668. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0230-9SantosJ.M.HortaH.2018The research agenda setting of higher education researchers76464966810.1007/s10734-018-0230-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stehr, N., & Grundmann, R. (2011). Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. Abingdon: Routledge.StehrN.GrundmannR.2011AbingdonRoutledge10.4324/9780203829646Search in Google Scholar
Ursin, J., Vahasantanen, K., McAlpine, L., & Hokka, P. (2020). Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(3), 311–325.UrsinJ.VahasantanenK.McAlpineL.HokkaP.2020Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work44331132510.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971Search in Google Scholar
Vaesen, K., & Katzav, J. (2017). How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers? PLoS ONE, 12(9), e0183967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183967VaesenK.KatzavJ.2017How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?129e0183967https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.018396710.1371/journal.pone.0183967559085828886054Search in Google Scholar
Wynn, J. (2017). Citizen science in the digital age: Rhetoric, science, and public engagement. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.WynnJ.2017TuscaloosaThe University of Alabama PressSearch in Google Scholar
Ying, Q.F., Venkatramanan, S., & Chiu, D.M. (2015). Modeling and analysis of scholar mobility on scientific landscape. WWW ’15 Companion. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web: 609–614. ACM.YingQ.F.VenkatramananS.ChiuD.M.2015InProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web: 609–614ACM10.1145/2740908.2741737Search in Google Scholar
Young, M. (2015). Competitive funding, citation regimes, and the diminishment of breakthrough research. Higher Education, 69, 421–434.YoungM.2015Competitive funding, citation regimes, and the diminishment of breakthrough research6942143410.1007/s10734-014-9783-4Search in Google Scholar