Critical factors affecting student satisfaction in a distance learning environment
y
01 mar 2024
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Research Article
Publicado en línea: 01 mar 2024
Páginas: 1 - 23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2023-0014
Palabras clave
© 2024 Evangelia Lysitsa et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ANOVA results comparing the means of variables in relation to employment status
F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|
Learner–learner interaction | 0.810 | 0.447 |
Learner–tutor interaction | 0.127 | 0.881 |
Self-regulated learning | 1.152 | 0.320 |
Student satisfaction | 3.366 | 0.038 |
Internet self-efficacy | 0.525 | 0.593 |
Variables in the equation
Variables in the equation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | ||
Step 1 |
Learner–tutor interaction | 1.175 | 0.316 | 13.792 | 1 | 0.000 | 3.238 |
Constant | -3.244 | 1.187 | 7.468 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.039 | |
Step 2 |
Learner–tutor interaction | 1.005 | 0.316 | 10.087 | 1 | 0.001 | 2.732 |
Self-regulated learning | 1.101 | 0.485 | 5.166 | 1 | 0.023 | 3.008 | |
Constant | -6.408 | 1.900 | 11.379 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Model summary
Step | -2 Log likelihood |
---|---|
1 | 114.931 |
2 | 109.374 |
Classification table
Observed values | Predicted values | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction | Correct classification percentage | ||||
0.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Step1 | Satisfaction | 0.00 | 7 | 21 | 25.0 |
1.00 | 4 | 90 | 95.7 | ||
Overall percentage | 79.5 | ||||
Step 2 | Satisfaction | 0.00 | 9 | 19 | 32.1 |
1.00 | 4 | 90 | 95.7 | ||
Overall percentage | 81.1 |
Socio-demographic characteristics of the students participating in the survey
Variable | Percentage (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Men | 58 | 48.5 |
Women | 64 | 52.5 | |
Age (years) | £30 | 19 | 15.6 |
31–40 | 55 | 45.1 | |
41–50 | 42 | 34.4 | |
>50 | 6 | 4.9 | |
Educational level | Tertiary Technical Institute (ATEI) graduates | 23 | 18.9 |
University (AEI) graduates | 71 | 58.1 | |
Master’s | 23 | 18.9 | |
PhD | 5 | 4.1 | |
Employment status | Fully employed | 96 | 78.7 |
Semi-/part-time employed | 17 | 13.9 | |
Unemployed | 9 | 7.4 | |
Previous experience in distance learning | Yes | 23 | 18.9 |
No | 99 | 81.1 |
Hosmer–Lemeshow Test
Bήμα | Chi-square | Df | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 11.798 | 8 | 0.160 |
2 | 4.165 | 8 | 0.842 |
Mean and standard deviations
Learner–learner interaction | Learner–tutor interaction | Self-regulated learning | Student satisfaction | Internet self-efficacy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 2.53 | 3.95 | 3.55 | 3.67 | 3.77 |
Standard deviation | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 0.79 |
ANOVA results comparing the means of variables in relation to the number of modules
F | p | |
---|---|---|
Learner–learner interaction | 1.061 | 0.349 |
Learner–tutor interaction | 5.993 | 0.003 |
Self-regulated learning | 2.449 | 0.091 |
Student satisfaction | 0.966 | 0.384 |
Internet self-efficacy | 1.534 | 0.220 |
Classification table Block 0
Observed values | Predicted values | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction | Percentage correct | ||||
0 | 1 | ||||
Step 0 | Satisfaction | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0.0 |
1 | 0 | 94 | 100.0 | ||
Overall percentage | 77.0 |
Pearson correlation coefficients
Learner–learner interaction | Learner–tutor interaction | Selfregulated learning | Satisfaction | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Learner–learner interaction | Pearson correlation | 1 | |||
Sig. (two-tailed) | |||||
Learner–tutor interaction | Pearson correlation | 0.338 |
1 | ||
Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | ||||
Self-Regulated learning | Pearson correlation | 0.279 |
0.294 |
1 | |
Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.001 | |||
Satisfaction | Pearson correlation | 0.276 |
0.465 |
0.395 |
1 |
Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Internet Self-efficacy | Pearson correlation | 0.194 |
0.260 |
0.322 |
0.315 |
Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.032 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 |