[
1. Al-Azawei, A.; Parslow, P. & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126-146.10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Anderson, C. (2012). Barriers and enabler to teachers’ adoption of online teaching at an Australian University. Dissertation RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:160215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Aydin, C. (2005). Turkish mentors’ perception of roles, competencies and resources for online teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/makale_goster.php?id=208 /
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Bacow, L. S., Bowen, G. B., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A., & Long, M. P. (2012). Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. New York: Ithaka.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Design Evaluation of a Simulation for Teacher Education. SAGE Open, 5(2). doi:10.1177/215824401559245410.1177/2158244015592454
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Baran, E. (2011). The transformation of online teaching practice: Tracing successful online teaching in higher education. Dissertation Iowa State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Bawane, J., & Spector, J. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397. doi:10.1080/0158791090323653610.1080/01587910903236536
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2). doi:10.1080/0158791060078949810.1080/01587910600789498
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 59-77.10.24059/olj.v16i1.215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Billings, D. M. (1988). A conceptual model of correspondence course completion. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 23-35.10.1080/08923648809526621
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: a narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34(1), 48–63.10.1080/01587919.2013.770427
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Bozarth, J., Chapman, D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for Distance Learning: Designing an Online Student Orientation Course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Brindley, J., Blaschke, L. M., & Walti, C. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online: A time comparison. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/cavanaugh81.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Chi, A. (2015). Development of the readiness to teach online scale. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1018/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 5(3), 298–314.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Chyung, S. Y. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2001). Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support, and control - according to the research. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online, pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 37-53). Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Cuthrell, K. & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do online students prefer? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no4/cuthrell.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Dahlstrom, E.; Brooks, D. C., & Bichsel, J. (2014). The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Denis, B., Watland, P., Pirotte, S., & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor. Proceedings of Networked Learning Competence 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance education, 28(1), 65-79.10.1080/01587910701305319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Downing, J. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2013). Teacher Educators’ Readiness, Preparation, and Perceptions of Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Fully Online Environment: An Exploratory Study. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 96-109. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2012.76002310.1080/08878730.2012.760023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Draus, P., Curran, M., & Trempus, M. (2014). The Influence of Instructor-Generated Video Content on Student Satisfaction with and Engagement in Asynchronous Online Classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Fusani, D. S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom.10.1080/00909889409365400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Gay, G. (2016). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computer in Higher Education, 2016(28), 199–220.10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Geddes, D. (2009). How Am I Doing? Exploring On-Line Gradebook Monitoring as a Self-Regulated Learning Practice That Impacts Academic Achievement. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 494-510. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759188
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Griffiths, M., & Graham, C. (2009). The Potential of Asynchronous Video in Online Education. Distance Learning, 6(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.01810.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Horvitz, B. S., Beach, A. L., Anderson, M. L., & Xia, J. (2015). Examination of faculty self-efficacy related to online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 305-316.10.1007/s10755-014-9316-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Johnson, S. G., & Berge, Z. (2012). Online education in the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(11), 897-902.10.1080/10668920903323948
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Jokiaho, A. & May, B. (2017). Hindernisse für die Nutzung von E-Learning an Hochschulen: Aktueller Forschungsstand. In C. Igel (Ed.), Bildungsräume (pp..20-31). Münster: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Keramati, A., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Kamrani, A. (2011). The Role of Readiness Factors in E-Learning Outcomes: An Empirical Study. Computers & Education, 57(3). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.00510.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online – A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research methods, 9, 202-220.10.1177/1094428105284919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Lichoro, D. M. (2015). Faculty preparedness for transition to teaching online courses in the Iowa Community College Online Consortium. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 14376.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Loewenthal, K. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Nadler, M., & Nadler, L. (1995, November). The roles of empathy, credibility, and sex in out of class communication between faculty and students. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Pajares, F. (2009). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-139). New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Pennsylvania State University (2016). Faculty Self-Assessment: Preparing for Online Teaching.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Pollanen, M. (2007). Improving learner motivation with online assignments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 203-213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.10.1080/08923640802039024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Reis, L., Ikari, O., Taha-Neto, K., Gugliotta, A., & Denardi, F. (2015). Delivery of a urology online course using Moodle versus didactic lectures methods. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(2). doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.00110.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Randall, F. A. (2001). Factor Analysis of Online Instruction Self-Efficacy Using the Tennessee Online Instruction Survey. PhD diss., University of Tennessee. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2649
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Rangecroft, M., Gilroy, P., Tricker, T., & Long, P. (2002). Gathering and using quality-of-student experience data on distance education courses. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 75-83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Roach, K. D., & Byrne, P. R. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50(1), 1-14.10.1080/03634520109379228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Robinia, K. A., & Anderson, M. L. (2010). Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(3), 168-175.10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.02.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Rollnick, S., Mason, P., & Butler, C. C. (2010). Health Behavior Change E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Rovai, A. (2003). In Search of Higher Persistence Rates in Distance Education Online Programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1). doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-610.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Schleef, E. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1104-1124.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Schmid, U., Goertz, L., Radomski, S., Thom, S., & Behrens, J. (2017). Monitor Digitale Bildung – Die Hochschulen im digitalen Zeitalter. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/DigiMonitor_Hochschulen_final.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and Barriers to Teaching Online College Courses: A Study of Experienced Online Faculty in Thirty-Six Colleges. Online Learning Consortium, 11(2), 73-128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. (2010). The Indicators of Instructor Presence that are Important to Students in Online Courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Shi, M., Bonk, C. & Magjuka, R. (2006). Time management strategies for online teaching. International Journal for Technology and Distance Learning, 3(2). Retrieved March, 27, 2013 from http://itdl.org/journal/feb_06/article01.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Shie, R., Gummer, E., & Niess, M. (2008). The quality of a web based course: perspectives of the instructor in the students. TechTrends, 52(6), 61-68.10.1007/s11528-008-0220-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Spector, J. M., & De la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Steinhardt, I. (2015). Lehre stärkt Forschung: Studiengangentwicklung durch ProfessorInnen im Handlungssystem Universität. Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Tallent-Runnels, M., Thomas, J., Lan, W., Cooper, S, Ahern, S., & Xiaoming L. (2016).Teaching Courses Online: A Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), pp. 93-135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Thiele, J. (2003). Learning patterns on online students, Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364-367.10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.10.3102/00346543068002202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. University of Toledo (2016). Faculty Online Teaching Readiness Survey. Retrieved online from https://www.utdl.edu/lv/assessments/faculty_readiness.html
]Search in Google Scholar
