[
1. Quin, D. Longitudinal and Contextual Associations between Teacher-Student Relationships and Student Engagement: A Systematic Review. – Review of Educational Research, Vol. 87, 2017, No 2, pp. 345-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434.10.3102/0034654316669434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Nguyen, T. D., C. Marisa, M. Jason. Understanding Student Behavioral Engagement: Importance of Student Interaction with Peers and Teachers. – The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 111, 2018, No 2, pp. 163-174.10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Kuh, G. D., T. M. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie, R. M. Gonyea. Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. – The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 79, 2008, No 5, pp. 540-563.10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kuh, G. D., S. Hu. The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. – The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 24, 2001, No 3, pp. 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0005.10.1353/rhe.2001.0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Higuera-Mendieta, D. R., S. Cortés-Corrales, J. Quintero, C. Gonzalez-Uribe. KAP Surveys and Dengue Control in Colombia: Disentangling the Effect of Sociodemographic Factors Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – PloS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 10, 2016, No 9.10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016504025727682141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Pike, G. R. Measuring Quality: A Comparison of Us News Rankings and NSSE Benchmarks. – Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45, 2004, No 2, pp. 193-208. DOI: 10.1023/b:rihe.0000015695.84207.44.10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015695.84207.44
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Bang, H., M. Chang, C. Lee. Racial and Linguistic Status Differences in the Effect of Interscholastic Sport Participation on School Engagement and Academic Performance among High School Students. – Psychological Reports, Vol. 123, 2020, No 2, pp. 452-471.10.1177/003329411881384530451593
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Reschly, A. L., S. L. Christenson. Prediction of Dropout among Students with Mild Disabilities: A Case for the Inclusion of Student Engagement Variables. – Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 27, 2006, No 5, pp. 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050301.10.1177/07419325060270050301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. DiLullo, C., P. McGee, R. Kriebel. Demystifying the Millennial Student: A Reassessment in Measures of Character and Engagement in Professional Education. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2011, No 4, pp. 214-226. DOI:10.1002/ase.240.10.1002/ase.24021735557
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Martinez, S., E. Mickey. The Effects of Participation in Interscholastic Sports on Latino Students’ Academic Achievement. – Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, Vol. 7, 2013, pp. 97-114. doi:10.1179/1935739713Z.0000000007.10.1179/1935739713Z.0000000007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Gharipour, M., L. T. Amber. Curriculum Development in Health and the Built Environment: Creating a Multidisciplinary Platform to Enhance Knowledge and Engagement. – Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 2020, pp. 2631-6862. DOI 10.1108/ARCH-09-2019-0212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Martin, F., D. U. Bolliger. Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. – Online Learn, Vol. 22, 2018, pp. 205-222.10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Trowler, V., P. Trowler. Student Engagement Evidence Summary. York, UK, Higher Education Academy, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ashwin, P., D. McVitty. The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices. – In: The European Higher Education Area. A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, P. Scott, Eds. Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Fredricks, J. A., P. Blumenfeld, J. Friedel, A. Paris. School Engagement. – In: What Do Children Need to Flourish? Boston, MA, Springer, 2005, pp. 305-321.10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Sun, Y., L. Ni, Y. Zhao, X. L. Shen, N. Wang. Understanding Students’ Engagement in MOOCs: An Integration of Self-Determination Theory and Theory of Relationship Quality. – British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 50, 2019, No 6, pp. 3156-3174.10.1111/bjet.12724
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kahn, P., L. Everington, K. Kelm, I. Reid, F. Watkins. Understanding Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments: The Role of Reflexivity. – Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 65, 2017, No 1, pp. 203-218.10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Mayer, R. E. Using Multimedia for e-Learning. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 33, 2017, No 5, pp. 403-423.10.1111/jcal.12197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Bonwell, C. C., J. A. Eison. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. – ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, 1991, pp. 20036-21183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Leach, L. Enhancing Student Engagement in one Institution. – Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 40, 2016, No 1, pp. 23-47.10.1080/0309877X.2013.869565
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. McClenney, K., C. N. Marti, C. Adkins. Student Engagement and Student Outcomes: Key Findings from. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. ERIC Number: ED529076, 2012, p. 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Veiga, F. H. Assessing Student Engagement in School: Development and Validation of a Four-Dimensional Scale. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 217, 2016, pp. 813-819.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Kim, P. W. Ambient Intelligence in a Smart Classroom for Assessing Students’ Engagement Levels. – Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol. 10, 2019, No 10, pp. 3847-3852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1077-8.10.1007/s12652-018-1077-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Bond, M. Facilitating Student Engagement through the Flipped Classroom Approach in K-12: A Systematic Review. – Computers & Education, Vol. 151, 2020, 103819.10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Oladipupo, O., O. Olugbara. Evaluation of Data Analytics-Based Clustering Algorithms for Knowledge Mining in Student Engagement Data. – Intelligent Data Analysis, Vol. 23, 2019, No 5, pp. 1055-1071. DOI: 10.3233/IDA-184254.10.3233/IDA-184254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Skinner, E. A., M. J. Belmont. Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. – Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 85, 2008, No 4, 571.10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Fredricks, J. A., W. McColskey. The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-Report Instruments. – In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer, 2012, pp. 763-782.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Zilvinskis, J., A. A. Masseria, G. R. Pike. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Examining the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Revised National Survey of Student Engagement. – Research in Higher Education, Vol. 58, 2017, No 8, pp. 880-903.10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Goggins, K. A., E. Bruce, W. Oddson, L. Brent, R. E. Tammy. Anatomical Locations for Capturing Magnitude Differences in Foot-Transmitted Vibration Exposure, Determined Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2020, pp. 1-15.10.1080/1463922X.2020.1731623
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Abdi, H., D. Valentin. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – In: N. Salkind, Ed. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2007, pp. 652-657.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Murtagh, F. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.10.1007/s11336-006-1579-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Das, S., X. Sun. Association Knowledge for Fatal Run-Off-Road Crashes by Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – IATSS Research, Vol. 39, 2016, No 2, pp. 146-155.10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.07.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Kim, K., E. Yamashita. Corresponding Characteristics and Circumstances of Collision-Involved Pedestrian in Hawaii. Transportation Research Record. – Journal of Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2424, 2008, pp. 18-24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Fagnant, D. J., K. M. Kockelman. Motorcycle Use in the United States: Crash Experiences, Safety Perspectives, and Countermeasures. – Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 7, 2015, No 1, pp. 20-39.10.1080/19439962.2014.894164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. LeRoux, B., H. Rouanetm. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. USA, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Simpson, J. C., S. Wilson, N. Currey. Motorcyclists’ Perceptions and Experiences of Riding and Risk and Their Advice for Safety. – Journal of Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, 2015, No 2, pp. 159-167.10.1080/15389588.2014.91185224761932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Jalayer, M., M. Pour-Rouholamin, H. Zhou. Wrong Way Driving Crashes: A Multiple Correspondence Approach to Identify Contributing Factors. – Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, 2018, No 1, pp. 35-41.10.1080/15389588.2017.134726028657352
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Greenacre, M. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. 3rd Edition. Barcelona, Spain, CRC Press, 2017. ISBN-13: 978-1-4987-3177-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Yokota, K., W. Kazumi, W. Taeko, O. Yusuke, H. Kazuki, F. Goro. Crime Linkage of Sex Offences in Japan by Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 14, 2017, No 2, pp. 109-119.10.1002/jip.1468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Sivasankaran, S. K., V. Balasubramanian. Investigation of Pedestrian Crashes Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis in India. – International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 27, 2020, No 2, pp. 144-155.10.1080/17457300.2019.168100531709899
]Search in Google Scholar
