Acceso abierto

The Impact of Note-Taking on the Learning Process in Intelligent Tutoring System Tutomat


Cite

[1] J. A. DeFalco and A. M. Sinatra, “Adaptive Instructional Systems: The Evolution of Hybrid Cognitive Tools and Tutoring Systems,” in Adaptive Instructional Systems, R. Sottilare, J. Schwarz J., Eds. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_510.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_5 Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Sottilare, “A Comprehensive Review of Design Goals and Emerging Solutions for Adaptive Instructional Systems,” Tech. Inst. Cognition and Learning, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–38, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. G. Trafton and S. B. Trickett, “Note-Taking for Self-Explanation and Problem Solving,” Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–38, Mar. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1601_110.1207/S15327051HCI1601_1 Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. T. H. Chi, M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser, “Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems,” Cognitive Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145–182, Apr. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_110.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. C. Salzman, C. Dede, and R. B. Loftin, “VR’s Frames of Reference: A Visualization Technique for Mastering Abstract Multidimensional Information,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, May 1999, pp. 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.30314110.1145/302979.303141 Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Y. White, “ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–100, Mar. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1001_110.1207/s1532690xci1001_1 Search in Google Scholar

[7] I. Tabak, W. A. Sandoval, B. K. Smith, F. Steinmuller, and B. J. Reiser, “Reflection as a Vehicle toward Local and Global Understanding,” Jan. 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[8] B. Barron et al., “Doing with Understanding: Lessons From Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 271–311, Jul. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.967205610.1080/10508406.1998.9672056 Search in Google Scholar

[9] K. A. Kiewra, “A Review of Note-Taking: The Encoding-Storage Paradigm and Beyond,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147–172, Jun. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0132664010.1007/BF01326640 Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. D. Rinehart and K. F. Thomas, “Summarization Ability and Text Recall by Novice Studiers,” Reading Research and Instruction, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 24–32, Jun. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1938807930955813010.1080/19388079309558130 Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. A. Spires, “Learning from a Lecture: Effects of Comprehension Monitoring,” Reading Research and Instruction, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 19–30, Dec. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/1938807930955811310.1080/19388079309558113 Search in Google Scholar

[12] P. Van Meter, L. Yokoi, and M. Pressley, “College Students’ Theory of Note-Taking Derived from Their Perceptions of Note-Taking,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 323–338, Sep. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.32310.1037/0022-0663.86.3.323 Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. W. McQuiggan, J. Goth, E. Ha, J. P. Rowe, and J. C. Lester, “Student Note-Taking in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments: Individual Differences and Learning Effects,” in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_5410.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_54 Search in Google Scholar

[14] G. Trevors, M. Duffy, and R. Azevedo, “Note-Taking within MetaTutor: Interactions between an Intelligent Tutoring System and Prior Knowledge on Note-Taking and Learning,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 507–528, Oct. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9343-810.1007/s11423-014-9343-8 Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. W. Anderson et al., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition, 1st edition. New York: Pearson, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[16] I. R. Weiss, “A National Convocation on Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Teachers, K-12,” 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. M. Bonner and W. G. Holliday, “How College Science Students Engage in Note-Taking Strategies,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 786–818, Oct. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2011510.1002/tea.20115 Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. N. Laidlaw, R. L. Skok, and T. F. McLaughlin, “The Effects of Notetaking and Self-Questioning on Quiz Performance,” Science Education, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 75–82, Jan. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.373077010510.1002/sce.3730770105 Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. P. Rickards and C. B. McCormick, “Effect of Interspersed Conceptual Prequestions on Note-Taking in Listening Comprehension,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 592–94, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.59210.1037/0022-0663.80.4.592 Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. King, “Comparison of Self-Questioning, Summarizing, and Notetaking-Review as Strategies for Learning From Lectures,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 303–323, Jun. 1992. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831202900230310.3102/00028312029002303 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8691
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Computer Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, Information Technology, Project Management, Software Development