1. bookVolumen 2 (2019): Edición 1 (December 2019)
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
20 Apr 2018
Calendario de la edición
1 tiempo por año
Acceso abierto

Can an instructional video increase the quality of English teachers’ assessment of learner essays?

Publicado en línea: 14 Jun 2022
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 2 (2019) - Edición 1 (December 2019)
Páginas: 140 - 161
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
20 Apr 2018
Calendario de la edición
1 tiempo por año

Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2014). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 236-260.10.1093/applin/amt046 Search in Google Scholar

Anders, Y., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2010). Diagnostic competences of mathamatics teachers and the performance of their learners. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 3, 175-193. doi:10.2378/peu2010.art13d10.2378/peu2010.art13d Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, A. L., & Drummond, K. V. (2006). Who is at risk and why? Teachers’ reasons for concern and their understanding and assessment of early literacy. Educational Assessment, 11, 149-178. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_2 Search in Google Scholar

Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Re: Professional competence of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 4, 469-520.10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2 Search in Google Scholar

Birkel, P., & Birkel, C. (2002). How concordant are teachers’ essay scorings? A replication of Rudolf Weiss’ studies. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49, 219-224. Search in Google Scholar

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5:1, 7-74. doi:10.1080/096959598005010210.1080/0969595980050102 Search in Google Scholar

Blomberg, G., Sherin, M., Renkl, A., Glogger, I., & Seidel, T. (2013). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 42, 443-463.10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6 Search in Google Scholar

Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a00019410.1027/2151-2604/a000194 Search in Google Scholar

Board, N. (2010). Writing framework for the 2011 national assessment of education progress. Washington: US Government Printing Office. Search in Google Scholar

Brookhart, S., & Chen, F. (2015) The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67/3, 343-368. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.92956510.1080/00131911.2014.929565 Search in Google Scholar

Chamberlain S., & Taylor, R. (2011) Online or face-to-face? An experimental study of examiner training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42/4, 665-675. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01062.x10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01062.x Search in Google Scholar

Charney, D. (1984). The Validity of Using Holistic Scoring to Evaluate Writing: A Critical Overview. Research in the Teaching of English, 18/1, 65-81. Search in Google Scholar

Cooksey, R., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2007). Assessment as Judgment-in-Context: Analysing how teachers evaluate students’ writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13/5, 401-434. doi:10.1080/1380361070172831110.1080/13803610701728311 Search in Google Scholar

Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell. Search in Google Scholar

Culham, R. (2003). 6 + 1 traits of writing: The complete guide. New York: Scholastic. Search in Google Scholar

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., & Powers, D. (2002). Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework. Modern Language Journal, 86, 67-96.10.1111/1540-4781.00137 Search in Google Scholar

Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511667268 Search in Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120-138. doi:10.1177/0022487105 Search in Google Scholar

Dempsey, M., Pytlik Zillig, L., & Bruning. R. (2009). Helping preservice teachers learn to assess writing: Practice and feedback in a web-based environment. Assessing Writing 14/1, 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.00310.1016/j.asw.2008.12.003 Search in Google Scholar

Eckes, T. (2008). Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability. Language Testing 2008 25 (2), 155-185. doi:10.1177/026553220708678010.1177/0265532207086780 Search in Google Scholar

Eckes, T. (2005). Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A multi-faceted Rasch analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2/3, 197-221. doi:10.1207/s15434311laq0203_210.1207/s15434311laq0203_2 Search in Google Scholar

Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: the concept of ‘diagnostic competence’. Language Testing, 21 (3), 259-283.10.1191/0265532204lt284oa Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2008). Multilingualism - an asset for Europe and a shared commitment. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URIS-ERV:ef0003 Search in Google Scholar

Fadde, P., & Sullivan, P. (2013). Using interactive video to develop preservice teachers’ classroom awareness. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13/2, 156-174. Search in Google Scholar

Feinberg, A., & Shapiro, E. (2009). Teacher accuracy: An examination of teacher-based judgments of students’ reading with differing achievement levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 453-462. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.6.453-46210.3200/JOER.102.6.453-462 Search in Google Scholar

Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2015). Effects of providing teachers with information about their students’ reading progress. School Psychology Review, 44, 60-75.10.17105/SPR44-1.60-75 Search in Google Scholar

Glogger-Frey, I., Herppich, S., & Seidel, T. (2018). Linking teachers’ professional knowledge and teachers’ actions: Judgment processes, judgments and training, Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.00510.1016/j.tate.2018.08.005 Search in Google Scholar

Goodrich Andrade, H. (2005). Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53/1, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-3110.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31 Search in Google Scholar

Guo, L., Crossley, S., & McNamara, D. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing 18/3, 218-238. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.00 Search in Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2001). Influence of elementary student gender on teachers’ perceptions of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 93-102. doi:10.1080/0022067010959657710.1080/00220670109596577 Search in Google Scholar

Hoge, R., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313. doi:10.2307/117018410.3102/00346543059003297 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2008). Second language writing. New York: CUP. Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, T., Vögelin, C., Machts, N., Keller, S., & Möller, J. (2019). Das Schülerinventar ASSET zur Beurteilung von Schülerarbeiten im Fach Englisch: Drei experimentelle Studien zu Effekten der Textqualität und der Schülernamen [The Student Inventory ASSET for judging students’ performances in English: Three experimental studies on effect of text quality and student names]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 66, 303-315. doi:10.2378/peu2019.art21d10.2378/peu2019.art21d Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, T., Vögelin, C., Machts, N., Keller, S., & Möller, J. (2018). The influence of spelling and prompting on teacher judgments of English essays. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA). New York City, 16. April 2018. Search in Google Scholar

Karing, C. (2009). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Grundschul- und Gymnasiallehrkräften im Leistungsbereich und im Bereich Interessen [Diagnostic competence of elementary and secondary school teachers in the domains of competence and interests]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 197-209. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.19710.1024/1010-0652.23.34.197 Search in Google Scholar

Keller, S. & Möller, J. (2019). Das Schülerinventar zur Beurteilung von Schülertexten. In: T. Rieke-Baulecke (Hrsg.). Schulmanagement Handbuch 169, 55-65. Search in Google Scholar

Keller, S. (2013). Integrative Schreibdidaktik Englisch für die Sekundarstufe. Theorie, Prozessgestaltung, Empirie. [Integrated writing instruction for secondary level – theory, processes and empirical evaluation]. Tübingen: Narr. Search in Google Scholar

Klose, B. (2014). Diagnostische Wahrnehmungskompetenzen von ReligionslehrerInnen [Diagnostic competences of teachers of religious education]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Search in Google Scholar

Klug, J., Gerich, M., Bruder, S., & Schmitz, B. (2012). Ein Tagebuch für Hauptschullehrkräfte zur Unterstützung der Reflexionsprozesse beim Diagnostizieren [A diary for teachers to support reflection on diagnostic competence]. Empirische Pädagogik, 26, 292-311. Search in Google Scholar

Lai, E., Wolfe, E., & Vickers, D. (2015). Differentiation of illusory and true halo in writing scores. Educational and psychological measurement, 75/1, 102-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316441453099010.1177/0013164414530990 Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael (ed.) (1997). Implementing the Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Moss, P.A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, Vol. 23, No. 2, 5-12. Search in Google Scholar

Nation, I., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston: Heinle. Search in Google Scholar

Rezaei, A., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15, 18-39.10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003 Search in Google Scholar

Royal-Dawson, L., & Baird, J. (2009). Is Teaching Experience Necessary for Reliable Scoring of Extended English Questions? Educational Measurement 28/2, 2-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00142.x10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00142.x Search in Google Scholar

Schrader, F. (2013). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrpersonen [Teachers’ diagnostic competence]. Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen und Lehrerbildung, 31/2, 154-165. Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, B., Souvignier, E. & Hasselhorn, M. (2018). Stichwort–Formative assessment. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21 (4), 679-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-018-0838-710.1007/s11618-018-0838-7 Search in Google Scholar

Shohamy, E., Gordon, C., & Kraemer, R. (1992). The effect of raters’ background and training on the reliability of direct writing tests. The Modern Language Journal, 76/1, 127-133.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb02574.x Search in Google Scholar

Südkamp, A., & Praetorius, A. K. (Eds.). (2017). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Theoretische und methodische Weiterentwicklungen. [Teachers’ diagnostic competences: theoretical and methodical advances]. Waxmann Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a002762710.1037/a0027627 Search in Google Scholar

Visible Learning Plus (2018). Visible learning plus. 250+ influences on student achievement. Online: https://us.corwin.com/sites/default/files/250_influences_10.1.2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S., Machts, N., & Möller, J. (2019). The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays. Assessing Writing, 39, 50-63. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.00310.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003 Search in Google Scholar

Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S., & Möller, J. (2018). The impact of vocabulary and spelling on judgments of ESL essays: an analysis of teacher comments. The Language Learning Journal. doi:10.1080/09571736.2018.152266210.1080/09571736.2018.1522662 Search in Google Scholar

Weigle, S.C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732997 Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, E., & Jiao, H. (2016). Features of difficult to score essays. Assessing Writing, 27, 1-10.10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.002 Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo