Teaching material based on biomechanical evidence: ‘high-jump hurdles’ for improving fundamental motor skills

1. Akutsu C., A. Yamamoto, T. Urata, T. Nakamura, A. Ito (2012) PVC mini-hurdles, which do not hurt and terrify. Taiikuka Kyouiku, 60: 44−45, (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

2. Busscher I., W.J.M. Gerver, I. Kingma, F.H. Wapstra, J. Verkerke, A. G.Veldhuizen (2011) The growth of different body length dimensions is not predictive for the peak growth velocity of sitting height in the individual child. Eur. Spine J., 20: 791−797. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1584-610.1007/s00586-010-1584-6308267020936309Search in Google Scholar

3. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/documents/peframework2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

4. Coh M. (2004) Biomechanical analysis of 110 m hurdle clearance technique. Mod. Athl. Coach, 42: 4−8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Coh M., J. Iskra (2012) Biomechanical studies of 110 m hurdle clearance technique. Sport Sci., 5(1): 10−14.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fortune M.A.L. (1988) Biomechanical analysis of 110m hurdles. In: J. Jarver (ed) The hurdles: contemporary theory, technique and training. 2nd ed. Tafnews Press, Mountain View, pp. 70−72.Search in Google Scholar

7. Gavin T. (1977) Low the hurdles at elementary and junior high levels. Athl. J., 57: 42–43.Search in Google Scholar

8. Geithner C.A., T. Satake, B. Woynarowska, R.M. Malina (1999) Adolescent spurts in body dimensions: average and modal sequences. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 11: 287−295. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1999)11:3287::AID-AJHB1 3.0.CO;2-HSearch in Google Scholar

9. Hay J.G. (1978) The biomechanics of sports techniques. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 400−406.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ito A. (2010) Teaching content clarified by the science of hurdle running: recommending simple hurdle running. Jpn. J. Pedagog. of Physic. Edu., 26: 29−34, (in: Japanese). http://doi.org/10.11243/jsppe.26.1_16. 11. Ito A., H. Ichikawa (1999) Science in track and field: hurdles (1). Gekkan Rikujoukyougi Magazine, 33: 166−167, (in: Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

12. Ito A., M. Ishikawa, J. Isolehto, P.V. Komi (2006) Changes in the step width, step length, and step frequency of the world’s top sprinters during the 100 metre. New Stud. Athl., 21: 35−39.Search in Google Scholar

13. McDonald C., J. Dapena (1991) Linear kinematics of the men’s 110-m and women’s 100-m hurdles races. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 23: 1382−1391. DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199112000-0001010.1249/00005768-199112000-00010Search in Google Scholar

14. http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/04/11/1298356_8.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

15. Morita M., A. Ito, H. Numazawa, K. Ogiso, T. Yasui (1994) Second section: Analysis of sprint hurdle running (110 mH & 100 mH) and 400-m hurdles. In: Biomechanical Research Team in 3rd IAAF World Championships (ed). Skill of world-top class athlete. Baseball magazine Press, Tokyo, pp. 66−91, (in Japanese).Search in Google Scholar

16. Obens T. (1985) Pressure distribution and velocity as characteristics of hurdle running. In: D.A., Winter, R.W. Norman, R.P. Wells, K.C. Hayes, A.E. Patla (eds). International Series on Biomechanics: Biomechanics IX-B. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, pp. 364−369.Search in Google Scholar

17. Otsuka M. (2013) Sprint running lesson evaluated by attitude measurement: the effect of a developmental stage, sex, and positive feelings. Jpn. J. Pedagog. Physic. Edu., 29: 49−62, (in Japanese). DOI: http://doi.org/10.11243/jsppe.29.1_49.Search in Google Scholar

18. Otsuka M., M. Ito, A. Ito (2010) Analysis of hurdle running at various inter-hurdle distances in an elementary school PE class. Int. J. Sport Health Sci., 8: 35−42. http://doi.org/10.5432/ijshs.20090027.10.5432/ijshs.20090027Search in Google Scholar

19. Otsuka M., M. Ito, A. Ito (2011) Examination about the effectiveness of new methods of teaching hurdle running based on sport biomechanics: for elementary school 6th graders in PE. Jpn. J. Pedag. Physic. Edu., 27: 1−18, (in Japanese: English abstract). http://doi.org/10.11243/jsppe.27.1_1.Search in Google Scholar

20. Otsuka M., S. Otomo, T. Isaka, T. Kurihara, A. Ito (2015) Recommendations for instructional content: relationship of hurdle clearance motion with body height and hurdle running time in 12–14 year old boys. J. Physic. Edu. Sport, 15: 194−201. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2015.02030.10.7752/jpes.2015.02030Search in Google Scholar

21. Scammon R.E. (1930) The measurement of the body in childhood. In: J.A. Harris, C.M. Jackson, D.G. Paterson, R.E. Scammon (eds). The measurement of Man. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 193.Search in Google Scholar

22. Schmidt R.A. (1991) Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations. In: J. Requin, G.E. Stelmach (eds). Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 59–75.10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_6Search in Google Scholar

23. Shimizu Y. (2008) Physical education in elementary school. Aspects of exercise and teaching that can be understood through photographs. Track and field. Taisyukan Press, Tokyo, pp. 48−55, (in Japanese). Search in Google Scholar