This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Taheri S, Salehiniya H. Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Womens Health 2019; 11: 287-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S197604MomenimovahedZTiznobaikATaheriSSalehiniyaHOvarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors20191128799doi10.2147/IJWH.S197604650043331118829Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips K-A, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 2017; 317: 2402-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112KuchenbaeckerKBHopperJLBarnesDRPhillipsK-AMooijTMRoos-BlomMJet alRisks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers2017317240216doi10.1001/jama.2017.711228632866Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Neff RT, Senter L, Salani R. BRCA mutation in ovarian cancer: testing, implications and treatment considerations. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9: 519-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068NeffRTSenterLSalaniRBRCA mutation in ovarian cancer: testing, implications and treatment considerations2017951931doi10.1200/JCO.2003.01.06812743135Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bast RC Jr. Status of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(10 Suppl): 200s-5s. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068BastRCJrStatus of tumor markers in ovarian cancer screening20032110 Suppl200s5sdoi10.1200/JCO.2003.01.068Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yawn BP, Barrette BA, Wollan PC. Ovarian cancer: the neglected diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 1277-82. doi: 10.4065/79.10.1277YawnBPBarretteBAWollanPCOvarian cancer: the neglected diagnosis200479127782doi10.4065/79.10.127715473410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bottoni P, Scatena R. The role of CA 125 as tumor marker: biochemical and clinical aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 867: 229-44. doi: 10.1007/978-94017-7215-0_14BottoniPScatenaRThe role of CA 125 as tumor marker: biochemical and clinical aspects201586722944doi10.1007/978-94017-7215-0_14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yang WL, Lu Z, Bast RC. The role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2017; 17: 577-91. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017YangWLLuZBastRCThe role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer20171757791doi10.1080/14737159.2017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sundar S, Neal RD, Kehoe S. Diagnosis of ovarian cancer. BMJ 2015; 351: h4443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4443SundarSNealRDKehoeSDiagnosis of ovarian cancer2015351h4443doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h444310.1136/bmj.h444326328593Search in Google Scholar
Elies A, Rivière S, Pouget N, Becette V, Dubot C, Donnadieu A, et al. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18: 555-66. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1458614EliesARivièreSPougetNBecetteVDubotCDonnadieuAet alThe role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer20181855566doi10.1080/14737140.2018.145861429633903Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray-Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 2009; 115: 1234-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24149du BoisAReussAPujade-LauraineEHarterPRay-CoquardIPfistererJRole of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO)2009115123444doi10.1002/cncr.2414919189349Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arab M, Jamdar F, Sadat Hosseini M, Ghodssi-Ghasemabadi R, Farzaneh F, Ashrafganjoie T. Model for prediction of optimal debulking of epithelial ovarian cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19: 1319-24. doi: 10.22034/ APJCP.2018.19.5.1319ArabMJamdarFSadat HosseiniMGhodssi-GhasemabadiRFarzanehFAshrafganjoieTModel for prediction of optimal debulking of epithelial ovarian cancer201819131924doi10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.5.1319603181129802693Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vorgias G, Iavazzo C, Savvopoulos P, Myriokefalitaki E, Katsoulis M, Kalinoglou N, et al. Can the preoperative Ca-125 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? A single institution cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.020VorgiasGIavazzoCSavvopoulosPMyriokefalitakiEKatsoulisMKalinoglouNet alCan the preoperative Ca-125 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? A single institution cohort study2009112115doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.02019119502Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kang S, Kim TJ, Nam BH, Seo SS, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. Preoperative serum CA-125 levels and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101: 13-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21398KangSKimTJNamBHSeoSSKimBGBaeDSet alPreoperative serum CA-125 levels and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis2010101137doi10.1002/jso.2139820025071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chi DS, Zivanovic O, Palayekar MJ, Eisenhauer EL, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, et al. A contemporary analysis of the ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict primary cytoreductive outcome in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.010ChiDSZivanovicOPalayekarMJEisenhauerELAbu-RustumNRSonodaYet alA contemporary analysis of the ability of preoperative serum CA-125 to predict primary cytoreductive outcome in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinoma2009112610doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.01019100916Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodriguez N, Rauh-Hain JA, Shoni M, Berkowitz RS, Muto MG, Feltmate C, et al. Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.006RodriguezNRauh-HainJAShoniMBerkowitzRSMutoMGFeltmateCet alChanges in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy20121253626doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.00622333992Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pelissier A, Bonneau C, Chéreau E, de La Motte Rouge T, Fourchotte V, Daraï E, et al. CA125 kinetic parameters predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135: 542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.005PelissierABonneauCChéreauEde LaMotte Rouge TFourchotteVDaraïEet alCA125 kinetic parameters predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy20141355426doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.00525223808Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Cliby WA, Coleman RL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3460-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6907WrightAABohlkeKArmstrongDKBookmanMAClibyWAColemanRLet alNeoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline201634346073doi10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6907551259427502591Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Orr B, Edwards RP. Diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2018; 32: 943-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.010OrrBEdwardsRPDiagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer20183294364doi10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.01030390767Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eisenhauer EA. Real-world evidence in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2017; 28(Suppl 8): viii61-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx443EisenhauerEAReal-world evidence in the treatment of ovarian cancer201728Suppl 8viii615doi10.1093/annonc/mdx44329232466Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 943-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806VergoteITropéCGAmantFKristensenGBEhlenTJohnsonNet alNeoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer201036394353doi10.1056/NEJMoa090880620818904Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schwartz PE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the management of ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 16: 585-96. doi: 10.1053/ beog.2002.0304SchwartzPENeoadjuvant chemotherapy for the management of ovarian cancer20021658596doi10.1053/beog.2002.030412413936Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Morice P, Dubernard G, Rey A, Atallah D, Pautier P, Pomel C, et al. Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 955-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.06.004MoricePDubernardGReyAAtallahDPautierPPomelCet alResults of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer200319795563doi10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.06.00414644284Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pecorelli S, Odicino F, Favalli G. Interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 16: 573-83. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0302PecorelliSOdicinoFFavalliGInterval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer20021657383doi10.1053/beog.2002.030212413935Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zeng J, Yin J, Song X, Jin Y, Li Y, Pan L. Reduction of CA125 levels during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can predict cytoreduction to no visible residual disease in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma. J Cancer 2016; 7: 2327-32. doi: 10.7150/jca.16761ZengJYinJSongXJinYLiYPanLReduction of CA125 levels during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can predict cytoreduction to no visible residual disease in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma20167232732doi10.7150/jca.16761516654427994671Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mahdi H, Maurer KA, Nutter B, Rose PG. The impact of percent reduction in CA-125 levels on prediction of the extent of interval cytoreduction and outcome in patients with advanced-stage cancer of Müllerian origin treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 823-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000434MahdiHMaurerKANutterBRosePGThe impact of percent reduction in CA-125 levels on prediction of the extent of interval cytoreduction and outcome in patients with advanced-stage cancer of Müllerian origin treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy2015258239doi10.1097/IGC.000000000000043425828750Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gupta M, Patel SM, Arora R, Tiwari R, Dave P, Desai A, et al. Does preoperative CA-125 cutoff value and percent reduction in CA-125 levels correlate with surgical and survival outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer? – Our experience from a tertiary cancer institute. South Asian J Cancer 2020; 9: 30. doi: 10.4103/sajc. sajc_53_17GuptaMPatelSMAroraRTiwariRDavePDesaiAet alDoes preoperative CA-125 cutoff value and percent reduction in CA-125 levels correlate with surgical and survival outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer? – Our experience from a tertiary cancer institute2020930doi10.4103/sajc.sajc_53_17695657331956617Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kessous R, Wissing MD, Piedimonte S, Abitbol J, Kogan L, Laskov I, et al. CA-125 reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with success of cytoreductive surgery and outcome of patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 933-40. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13814KessousRWissingMDPiedimonteSAbitbolJKoganLLaskovIet alCA-125 reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with success of cytoreductive surgery and outcome of patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer20209993340doi10.1111/aogs.1381431954071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mueller JJ, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, O’Cearbhaill RE, Alvi FA, El Haraki A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140: 436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.008MuellerJJZhouQCIasonosAO’CearbhaillREAlviFAElHaraki Aet alNeoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center201614043642doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.008476758726777991Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson GC, Kitchener H, Lopes T, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 249-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6KehoeSHookJNankivellMJaysonGCKitchenerHLopesTet alPrimary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial201538624957doi10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-626002111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mahner S, Trillsch F, Chi D, Harter P, Pfisterer J, Hilpert F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer revisited. Ann Oncol 2016; 27(Suppl 1): i30-2. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw092MahnerSTrillschFChiDHarterPPfistererJHilpertFet alNeoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer revisited201627Suppl 1i302doi10.1093/annonc/mdw09227141067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Machida H, Tokunaga H, Matsuo K, Matsumura N, Kobayashi Y, Tabata T, et al. Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 868-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.520MachidaHTokunagaHMatsuoKMatsumuraNKobayashiYTabataTet alSurvival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis20204686875doi10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.520753513131818526Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
du Bois A, Baert T, Vergote I. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 2398-405. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00022du BoisABaertTVergoteIRole of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer2019372398405doi10.1200/JCO.19.0002231403864Open DOISearch in Google Scholar