Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer in women around the world, with approximately 240,000 new cases diagnosed each year. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a very aggressive disease and is the eighth leading cause of cancer death with five-year survival rates below 45%.1 Of all patients diagnosed with EOC, approximately 15% of patients will have germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation present. The cumulative ovarian cancer risk to age of 80 is 36–53% in BRCA1 mutation and 11–25% in BRCA2 mutation. Cumulative ovarian risk to age of 80 in population without BRCA mutation is 1–2%.2,3
Due to the lack of effective screening strategies and the unspecific onset of symptoms, EOC is detected in 75% of cases at an advanced stage.4 The initial symptoms are persistent or frequent, nonspecific and mainly include abdominal distension or flatulence, pelvic or abdominal pain, bloating, loss of appetite, unexplained weight loss, fatigue or changes in bowel habits. About 36% of women with unspecific clinical symptoms make several visits to their general practitioner before being diagnosed with ovarian cancer.5
CA-125, also known as mucin 16 or MUC16, is a large membrane glycoprotein belonging to the wide mucin family, encoded by the homonymous MUC16 gene.6 It can be very useful and highly specific as a prognostic maker, but not as a diagnostic tool due to lack of sensitivity.7 CA-125 level is increased in more than 85% of women with an advanced stage EOC but is only increased in 50% of stage I cancers.7,8 CA-125 level may also be increased in almost 6% of women without ovarian cancer due to adenomyosis, endometriosis, retrograde menstrual bleeding or other non-malignant diseases.7
For decades the standard treatment for EOC has been primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by platinum- and taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). A more contemporary approach is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), but, opinions on the optimal treatment are still divided.9 Despite different treatment approaches, the prognosis is mainly influenced by the residual disease after surgical cytoreduction. Patients benefit most from complete gross resection or optimal cytoreduction (residual lesions with a diameter of 1 cm or less). Suboptimal cytoreduction with residual disease of more than 1 cm is associated with poorer survival.10 Many studies have attempted to assess different scoring systems which include preoperative serum CA-125 to determine the patient selection where optimal primary cytoreduction might be achievable but results and recommendations are inconsistent.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
The aim of our study was to analyse experience of single institution as Cancer comprehensive centre with preoperative usefulness of CA-125.
A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, from January 2005 to December 2014. The data collection and its analysis were approved by Institutional Ethical committee.
Two hundred and fifty-three women with advanced stage ovarian cancer were enrolled in the study. All women had histologically confirmed FIGO stage IIIC and IV EOC. Women were divided into two groups based on their initial treatment. The first group consisted of 215 women receiving NACT (based on carboplatin and paclitaxel), followed by IDS. The second group consisted of 38 women treated with PDS, followed by ACT (3 courses of the same regimen as NACT). The selection of women for the specific treatment was based on the ability to perform a complete gross resection or to achieve a residual disease of 1 cm or less. This decision was based on preoperative imaging studies (abdominal and thoracic CT) and/or diagnostic laparoscopy in 173 patients. Levels of preoperative CA-125 did not influence the decision about primary treatment modality. When option to achieve complete gross or at least optimal cytoreduction was considered low, NACT was selected. Patients were assessed as inoperable (low probability of < 1cm residual disease) if the tumour penetrated the pelvic wall, if carcinosis of the intestine, intestinal serosa or mesentery was present or if imaging studies showed tumour spread to distant organs. The time from NACT to IDS was 4–6 weeks and the interval from PDS to ACT was 3–4 weeks for all included women.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of completion of treatment to the first radiological evidence of progression. An increase of CA-125 serum level without clinical signs of recurrence was not counted as progression, but triggered further radiological examinations. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of death. The surviving patients were censored at the time of the last follow-up.
The extent of residual disease was based on the diameter of the largest single lesion. At complete gross resection there were no macroscopic lesions, at optimal resection the lesions had a diameter of 1 cm or less and at suboptimal resection the lesions were larger than 1 cm. The study excluded women with a history of other malignant tumours or chemotherapy, FIGO stage I or II ovarian cancer, or non-epithelial histology of ovarian cancer.
Patients enrolled in the study were selected using the prospective clinical database of the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Clinical variables were collected from electronic hospital records, paper documentation and pathology reports to determine eligibility for the study, general characteristics of the patients, FIGO stage, tumour classification and histological type. Vital status was determined by analysing electronic medical records. Data were collected on the patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), menopause status, preoperative CA-125, duration of follow-up and residual disease after surgery.
For demographic data, descriptive statistics were used. The median survival of the two groups was calculated based on the non-normal distribution. The differences in patient characteristics were compared using the Chi-square test and ANOVA. ROC analysis was performed to determine cuff off values of serum CA-125 levels. PFS and OS and were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the rates in the two groups were compared using the log-rank test. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The statistical software SPSS for Windows version 26 was used for statistical analysis.
A retrospective analysis of 253 patients with advanced stage EOC treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between January 2005 and December 2014 was performed. There were 215 (84.9%) women enrolled in the NACT group and 38 (15.1%) women in the PDS group. The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Patients in the PDS group were statistically significantly younger (53.7
Clinical characteristics (N = 253)
Characteristic | PDS (N = 38) | NACT (N = 215) | |
---|---|---|---|
Median | 53.7 | 62.2 | < 0.001 |
Range | 29–84 | 39–85 | |
Median | 24.5 | 23.8 | 0.210 |
Range | 17.4–45.2 | 18.2–32.1 | |
Median | 2 | 2 | 0.080 |
Range | 0–5 | 0–4 | |
Median | 50 | 51.5 | 0.340 |
Range | 37–60 | 45–58 | |
1 | 7 (18.4) | 23 (10.7) | 0.780 |
2 | 22 (57.9) | 141 (65.6) | |
3 | 9 (23.7) | 49 (22.8) | |
4 | 0 (0) | 2 (0.9) | |
0 | 26 (68.4) | 96 (44.7) | 0.130 |
1 | 8 (21.0) | 85 (40.0) | |
2 | 4 (10.6) | 26 (12.1) | |
3 | 0 (0) | 5 (2.3) | |
4 | 0 (0) | 3 (1.4) | |
IIIC | 34 (89.5) | 143 (66.6) | 0.010 |
IV | 4 (10.5) | 72 (33.4) | |
Serous | 32 (84.2) | 202 (94.0) | 0.100 |
Endometrioid | 6 (15.8) | 8 (3.7) | |
Mucinous | 0 (0) | 3 (1.4) | |
Clear-cell | 0 (0) | 2 (0.9) | |
Median | 499 | 972 | 0.058 |
Range | 59–5739 | 10–31481 | |
Complete gross resection | 9 (23.7) | 124 (57.6) | 0.002 |
Optimal visible residual (≤1 cm) | 7 (18.4) | 30 (14.0) | |
Suboptimal (>1 cm) | 22 (57.9) | 61 (28.4) | |
Median | 10 | 9 | 0.555 |
Range | 7–28 | 5–59 |
ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologist; BMI = body mass index; FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NACT = neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PDS = primary debulking surgery; WHO = World Health Organization
In patients with NACT, 57.6% (124/215) had complete gross resection, 14.0% (30/215) had optimal resection and 28.4% (61/215) had suboptimal resection (p = 0.002; Table 1).
In women with PDS, 23.7% (9/38) had complete gross resection, 18.4% (7/38) had optimal resection and 57.9% (22/38) had suboptimal resection. Patients with complete gross resection had lowest CA-125 level at the time of diagnosis, 359 IU/ ml respectively. Highest CA-125 level was found in the group with suboptimal resection, 1522 IU/ ml, respectively.
CA-125 level in NACT group with complete gross resection at the time of diagnosis was 943 IU/ mL and after NACT 25 IU/ml (97.3% decline). CA-125 level in NACT group with optimal resection at the time of diagnosis was 1006 IU/ml and after NACT 36 IU/ml (96.4% decline). Serum CA-125 level in NACT group with suboptimal resection at the time of diagnosis was 1063 IU/ml and after NACT 68 IU/ml (93.6% decline) (Table 2).
Median and range CA-125 levels in different surgical outcomes in primary debulking surgery (PDS) and = neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) group
Surgical outcomes | PDS (N = 38) | NACT (N = 215) | |
---|---|---|---|
Complete gross resection | 359 |
943 |
0.006 |
Optimal resection | 512 |
1006 |
|
Suboptimal resection | 1522 |
1063 |
|
Complete gross resection | 25 |
0.020 | |
Optimal resection | 36 |
||
Suboptimal resection | 68 |
CA-125 = cancer antigen 125
Cut off values of serum CA-125 levels and sensitivity to obtain complete gross or optimal cytoreduction are shown in Table 3. If CA-125 preoperative serum level is 250 IU/ml, there is 74 % chance to obtain at least optimal cyoreduction (Table 3).
Statistical cut off values of serum CA-125 level and probability to obtain complete gross or optimal cytoreduction
CA-125 level (IU/ml) | Sensitivity (%) | Number and percentage of patients | |
---|---|---|---|
50 | 96.5 | 9 | 3.5 % |
100 | 86.5 | 33 | 13.0 % |
250 | 74.0 | 66 | 26.1 % |
500 | 58.0 | 98 | 38.7 % |
750 | 50.0 | 128 | 50.6 % |
1000 | 42.0 | 150 | 59.3 % |
CA-125 = cancer antigen 125
PFS in the NACT group was 8 months (95% CI: 6.4–9.5) and 18 months (95% CI: 12.5–23.4) in the PDS group (P = 0.008).
The median OS in the NACT group was 25 months (95% CI: 20.6-29.5) and 46 months (95% CI: 32.9–62.1) in the PDS group (p = 0.009).
PDS followed by platinum- and taxane-based ACT was the standard treatment for patients with advanced stage EOC until 2016, when the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) developed new clinical practice guidelines.17
According to these guidelines in patients with high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction with residual disease < 1cm (ideally no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity, PDS is recommended over NACT. For women with high perioperative risk or a low likelihood of achieving a cytoreduction with residual disease < 1cm (ideally no visible disease) NACT is the treatment of choice. For women who are fit for PDS but cytoreduction with residual disease < 1cm (ideally no visible disease) is unlikely, NACT is also the treatment of choice. IDS should be performed after three to six cycles of NACT for women who respond to chemotherapy or with stable disease.9,17 Patients with disease progression during NACT have a poor prognosis. Options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, inclusion in clinical trials and/or discontinuation of active cancer therapy and initiation of palliative supportive care. The role of surgery in palliative care is limited.18,19
There were studies published before year 2016 which showed non-inferiority of NACT compared to PDS.20, 21, 22, 23 Therefore also at our institute patients were treated with NACT where low chances to achieve at least optimal PDS were expected.
We studied the use of preoperative serum CA-125 levels to predict the likelihood of achieving at least optimal PDS or IDS in patients with advanced stage EOC.
Many studies have attempted to assess the ability of preoperative serum CA-125 level and various scoring systems to determine the patient selection where optimal primary cytoreduction can be achieved.
As expected, our results confirmed that the higher the CA-125 level is, the lower is probability to achieve optimal cytoreduction. At the preoperative CA-125 cut off value of 500 IU/ml the probability of achieving complete gross or at least optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced stage EOC was 58%. The probability increased to 74% at the cut off value of 250 IU/ml. These results add further data on usefulness of CA-125 levels as predictive factor for type of resection and are consistent with results published by other authors.12,13
Vorgias
Furthermore, Arab
However, Chi
If optimal PDS is not achievable or patients are not suitable for extensive surgery, NACT and IDS are indicated. These patients usually have higher preoperative CA-125 levels and a higher disease burden than patients treated with a PDS. This was also the case in our patients where patients with NACT and IDS had higher disease stage (FIGO IV 33.4%
Rodriguez
After NACT the role of CA-125 to predict complete gross or optimal cytoreduction is even more complex. Pelissier
Our study showed that patients with CA-125 serum reduction of more than 96.4% achieved higher complete gross and optimal IDS rate in comparison to patients with lover reduction of serum CA-125 level. It is well established that CA-125 serum level represents the tumour burden in most patients with advanced stage EOC. Sharp CA-125 serum level reduction during NACT might reflect the chemosensitivity of the tumour. This might be a predictive factor for surgical outcome. However, we cannot predict in advance the reduction of CA-125 level and therefore cannot predict the benefit of NACT.
A study published by Gupta
Kessous
Our study showed that NACT group had shorter OS and PSF compare to PDS group. The median PFS and OS for patients in the NACT group was 8 and 25 months, compared to 25 and 49 months in the PDS group, respectively. This is consistent with data published by Mueller
Patients included in before mentioned three studies were of comparable age, FIGO stage and had comparable preoperative CA-125 levels.
According to Maner and Machida NACT can be associated with lower peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality and shorter hospital stay but PDS may offer a better chance of survival in selected patients.30,31 Median hospital stay in our patients treated with IDS (9 days) was not different from patients treated with PDS (10 days, p = 0.555) which is consistent with the study published by du Bois.32 However, patients treated with PDS had better survival as already mentioned.
There are limitations to our study among which are its retrospective nature and that there were no generally accepted selection criteria at that time for which patients are candidates for PDS or NACT.
Preoperative CA-125 cut off value of 500 IU/ml is a promising threshold to predict a successful PDS. After NACT a decline of CA-125 of more than 96.4% predicts at least optimal cytoreduction of IDS.