[
1. Briessen, Fritz van. The Way of the Brush: Painting Techniques of China and Japan. Tuttle Publishing, 1999]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Dumitrescu, Zamfir. Ars Perspectivae. București: Nemira, 2002]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Krikke, Jan. „A Chinese Perspective for Cyberspace?” International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter, 9, 1996: 34-35]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Mende, Kazuko. „The Representation of Pictorial Space in ”Ukie”.” Journal for Geometry and Graphics, Volume 1, No. 1, 1997: 31-40]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. New York: Zone Books, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Sasaki, Ken-ichi. „Perspectives East and West.” Contemporary Aesthetics (CA), Volume 11, 2013]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Scolari, Massimo. Oblique drawing: a history of anti-perspective. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2012]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Sofron, Daniel Ion. Perspectivă artistică. O abordare practică. Vol. I. Metode de construcție perspectivă. Iași: PIM, 2022]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Sofron, Daniel Ion. Perspectivă artistică. O abordare practică. Vol. II. Construcția cercului. Umbre. Reflexii. IaȘi: PIM, 2022]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Sofron, Daniel. „The “Axial” (“Vanishing Axis”) Perspective.” Anastasis Research in Medieval Culture and Art, vol. 2, no. 2, 2015: 175-184]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Soreanu, Cătălin, Lavinia German, Bogdan Gavrilean, Maria Oana Nae, Daniel Sofron, and Mihai Vereștiuc. Galeria Aparte. Index 2005 - 2020. Iași: Galeria Aparte, UNAGE, 2021]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Soreanu, Cătălin, and Lavinia German. „From an Exhibition Gallery to a Space for Contemporary Art Projects. Aparte Gallery of UNAGE Iași.” Review of Artistic Education, no. 24, 2022: 204-214]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Sullivan, Michael. The Arts of China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Tyler, Christopher W., and Chien-Chung Chen. Chinese Perspective as a Rational System: Relationship to Panofsky’s Symbolic Form. San Francisco and Taipei: Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute and Taiwan National University, 2011]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Urmă, Maria. „Orient and Occident. Specific Spatial Images.” Review of Artistic Education, no. 07+08, 2014: 186-194]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Vereștiuc, Mihai. „Object and Objecthood in Post-Minimal Sculpture.” Review of Artistic Education, 24, 2022: 194-203]Search in Google Scholar