3. The Oblique Parallel Perspective of Asian Art

1. Briessen, Fritz van. The Way of the Brush: Painting Techniques of China and Japan. Tuttle Publishing, 1999Search in Google Scholar

2. Dumitrescu, Zamfir. Ars Perspectivae. București: Nemira, 2002Search in Google Scholar

3. Krikke, Jan. „A Chinese Perspective for Cyberspace?” International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter, 9, 1996: 34-35Search in Google Scholar

4. Mende, Kazuko. „The Representation of Pictorial Space in ”Ukie”.” Journal for Geometry and Graphics, Volume 1, No. 1, 1997: 31-40Search in Google Scholar

5. Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

6. Sasaki, Ken-ichi. „Perspectives East and West.” Contemporary Aesthetics (CA), Volume 11, 2013Search in Google Scholar

7. Scolari, Massimo. Oblique drawing: a history of anti-perspective. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2012Search in Google Scholar

8. Sofron, Daniel Ion. Perspectivă artistică. O abordare practică. Vol. I. Metode de construcție perspectivă. Iași: PIM, 2022Search in Google Scholar

9. Sofron, Daniel Ion. Perspectivă artistică. O abordare practică. Vol. II. Construcția cercului. Umbre. Reflexii. IaȘi: PIM, 2022Search in Google Scholar

10. Sofron, Daniel. „The “Axial” (“Vanishing Axis”) Perspective.” Anastasis Research in Medieval Culture and Art, vol. 2, no. 2, 2015: 175-184Search in Google Scholar

11. Soreanu, Cătălin, Lavinia German, Bogdan Gavrilean, Maria Oana Nae, Daniel Sofron, and Mihai Vereștiuc. Galeria Aparte. Index 2005 - 2020. Iași: Galeria Aparte, UNAGE, 2021Search in Google Scholar

12. Soreanu, Cătălin, and Lavinia German. „From an Exhibition Gallery to a Space for Contemporary Art Projects. Aparte Gallery of UNAGE Iași.” Review of Artistic Education, no. 24, 2022: 204-214Search in Google Scholar

13. Sullivan, Michael. The Arts of China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973Search in Google Scholar

14. Tyler, Christopher W., and Chien-Chung Chen. Chinese Perspective as a Rational System: Relationship to Panofsky’s Symbolic Form. San Francisco and Taipei: Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute and Taiwan National University, 2011Search in Google Scholar

15. Urmă, Maria. „Orient and Occident. Specific Spatial Images.” Review of Artistic Education, no. 07+08, 2014: 186-194Search in Google Scholar

16. Vereștiuc, Mihai. „Object and Objecthood in Post-Minimal Sculpture.” Review of Artistic Education, 24, 2022: 194-203Search in Google Scholar