This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Adam, K. (2019, October 22). Why didn’t Greta Thunberg win the Nobel Peace Prize? The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/why-didnt-greta-thunberg-win-the-nobel-peace-prize/2019/10/11/e84e6efc-eba4-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html.AdamK.2019October22Why didn’t Greta Thunberg win the Nobel Peace Prize?https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/why-didnt-greta-thunberg-win-the-nobel-peace-prize/2019/10/11/e84e6efc-eba4-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html.Search in Google Scholar
Asikainen, A., Iñiguez, G., Ureña-Carrión, J., Kaski, K., & Kivelä, M. (2020). Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks. Science Advances, 6(19). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax7310AsikainenA.IñiguezG.Ureña-CarriónJ.KaskiK.KiveläM.2020Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks619https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax731010.1126/sciadv.aax7310Search in Google Scholar
Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic medicine, 66(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9BabyakM. A.2004What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models663411421https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a910.1097/00006842-200405000-00021Search in Google Scholar
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115BailC. A.ArgyleL. P.BrownT. W.BumpusJ. P.ChenH.HunzakerM. F.LeeJ.MannM.MerhoutF.VolfovskyA.2018Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization1153792169221https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.180484011510.1073/pnas.1804840115Search in Google Scholar
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620BarberáP.JostJ. T.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. A.BonneauR.2015Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?261015311542https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761559462010.1177/0956797615594620Search in Google Scholar
Barbieri, N., Bonchi, F., & Manco, G. (2013). Topic-aware social influence propagation models. Knowledge and Information Systems, 37(3), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0646-6BarbieriN.BonchiF.MancoG.2013Topic-aware social influence propagation models373555584https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0646-610.1109/ICDM.2012.122Search in Google Scholar
Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., & Vespignani, A. (2008). Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge University Press.BarratA.BarthelemyM.VespignaniA.2008Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511791383Search in Google Scholar
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2020). Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks. Physical Review Letters, 124(4), 048301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301BaumannF.Lorenz-SpreenP.SokolovI. M.StarniniM.2020Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks1244048301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.04830110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301Search in Google Scholar
Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030459BenchS. W.LenchH. C.2013On the function of boredom33459472https://doi.org/10.3390/bs303045910.3390/bs3030459Search in Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353BergerJ.MilkmanK. L.2012What makes online content viral?492192205https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.035310.1509/jmr.10.0353Search in Google Scholar
Birch, S. (2020). Political polarization and environmental attitudes: A cross-national analysis. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1673997BirchS.2020Political polarization and environmental attitudes: A cross-national analysis294697718https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.167399710.1080/09644016.2019.1673997Search in Google Scholar
Carrington, D. (2019, March 14). Greta Thunberg nominated for Nobel Peace Prize. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/14/greta-thunberg-nominated-nobel-peace-prizeCarringtonD.2019March14Greta Thunberg nominated for Nobel Peace Prizehttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/14/greta-thunberg-nominated-nobel-peace-prizeSearch in Google Scholar
Chen, T. H. Y., Salloum, A., Gronow, A., Ylä-Anttila, T., & Kivelä, M. (2020, July 6). Polarization of climate politics results from partisan sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twittersphere. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.02706. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/49qguChenT. H. Y.SalloumA.GronowA.Ylä-AnttilaT.KiveläM.2020July6Polarization of climate politics results from partisan sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twitterspherehttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/49qgu10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102348Search in Google Scholar
Cody, E. M., Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2015). Climate change sentiment on twitter: An unsolicited public opinion poll. PloS one, 10(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136092CodyE. M.ReaganA. J.MitchellL.DoddsP. S.DanforthC. M.2015Climate change sentiment on twitter: An unsolicited public opinion poll108118https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.013609210.1371/journal.pone.0136092Search in Google Scholar
Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A., & Li, Z. (2019). Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 9(24). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8DahalB.KumarS. A.LiZ.2019Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets924https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-810.1007/s13278-019-0568-8Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. M. (2021). A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002DahlgrenP. M.2021A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure4211533https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-000210.2478/nor-2021-0002Search in Google Scholar
Fariss, C. J., & Jones, Z. M. (2018). Enhancing validity in observational settings when replication is not possible. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.5FarissC. J.JonesZ. M.2018Enhancing validity in observational settings when replication is not possible62365380https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.510.1017/psrm.2017.5Search in Google Scholar
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018). Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3140565GarimellaK.MoralesG. D. F.GionisA.MathioudakisM.2018Quantifying controversy on social media11127https://doi.org/10.1145/314056510.1145/2835776.2835792Search in Google Scholar
Guerini, M., Strapparava, C., & Ozbal, G. (2011). Exploring text virality in social networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1).GueriniM.StrapparavaC.OzbalG.2011Exploring text virality in social networks51Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, L. K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F. Å., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011, June 28–30). Good friends, bad news-affect and virality in twitter. In J. J. J. H. Park, L. T. Yang, & C. Lee (Eds.), Future information technology: 6th International Conference on Future Information Technology (pp. 34–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9HansenL. K.ArvidssonA.NielsenF. Å.ColleoniE.EtterM.2011June2830Good friends, bad news-affect and virality in twitterInParkJ. J. J. H.YangL. T.LeeC.(Eds.),3443Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-910.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5Search in Google Scholar
Hanteer, O., & Rossi, L. (2019). An innovative way to model twitter topic-driven interactions using multiplex networks. Frontiers in Big Data, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00009HanteerO.RossiL.2019An innovative way to model twitter topic-driven interactions using multiplex networks29https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.0000910.3389/fdata.2019.00009Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. M. (2004). The problem of overfitting. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0342472HawkinsD. M.2004The problem of overfitting441112https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034247210.1021/ci0342472Search in Google Scholar
Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from twitter Big Data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010JangS. M.HartP. S.2015Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from twitter Big Data321117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.01010.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010Search in Google Scholar
Jenders, M., Kasneci, G., & Naumann, F. (2013). Analyzing and predicting viral tweets. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide web (pp. 657–664). https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488017JendersM.KasneciG.NaumannF.2013Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide web657664https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.248801710.1145/2487788.2488017Search in Google Scholar
Karypis, G. & Kumar, V. (1998). A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM Journal on scientific Computing, 20(1), 359–392. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/305219.305248KarypisG.KumarV.1998A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs201359392https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/305219.30524810.1137/S1064827595287997Search in Google Scholar
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Tardos, É. (2003, August). Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 137–146).KempeD.KleinbergJ.TardosÉ.2003AugustProceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining13714610.1145/956750.956769Search in Google Scholar
Kirilenko, A. P. & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008KirilenkoA. P.StepchenkovaS. O.2014Public microblogging on climate change: One year of twitter worldwide26171182https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.00810.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008Search in Google Scholar
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.xMcCrightA. M.DunlapR. E.2011The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010522155194https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.xSearch in Google Scholar
McNeish, D. M. (2015). Using lasso for predictor selection and to assuage overfitting: A method long overlooked in behavioral sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(5), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1036965McNeishD. M.2015Using lasso for predictor selection and to assuage overfitting: A method long overlooked in behavioral sciences505471484https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.103696510.1080/00273171.2015.1036965Search in Google Scholar
Muddiman, A., McGregor, S. C., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). (Re)claiming our expertise: Parsing large text corpora with manually validated and organic dictionaries. Political Communication, 36(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1517843MuddimanA.McGregorS. C.StroudN. J.2019(Re)claiming our expertise: Parsing large text corpora with manually validated and organic dictionaries362214226https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.151784310.1080/10584609.2018.1517843Search in Google Scholar
Munger, K. (2019). The limited value of non-replicable field experiments in contexts with low temporal validity. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119859294MungerK.2019The limited value of non-replicable field experiments in contexts with low temporal validity5314https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511985929410.1177/2056305119859294Search in Google Scholar
Musco, C., Musco, C., & Tsourakakis, C. E. (2018). Minimizing polarization and disagreement in social networks. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (pp. 369–378).MuscoC.MuscoC.TsourakakisC. E.2018Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference36937810.1145/3178876.3186103Search in Google Scholar
Nagarajan, M., Purohit, H., & Sheth, A. (2010). A qualitative examination of topical tweet and retweet practices. Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Citeseer.NagarajanM.PurohitH.ShethA.2010Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social MediaCiteseerSearch in Google Scholar
Nelimarkka, M., Laaksonen, S.-M., & Semaan, B. (2018). Social media is polarized, social media is polarized: Towards a new design agenda for mitigating polarization. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 957–970).NelimarkkaM.LaaksonenS.-M.SemaanB.2018Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference95797010.1145/3196709.3196764Search in Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.PariserE.2011Penguin UKSearch in Google Scholar
Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC working group 1 report. PloS one, 9(4), e94785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094785PearceW.HolmbergK.HellstenI.NerlichB.2014Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC working group 1 report94e94785https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009478510.1371/journal.pone.0094785Search in Google Scholar
Saito, K., Nakano, R., & Kimura, M. (2008). Prediction of information diffusion probabilities for independent cascade model. International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems (pp. 67–75). Springer.SaitoK.NakanoR.KimuraM.2008International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems6775Springer10.1007/978-3-540-85567-5_9Search in Google Scholar
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408StieglitzS.Dang-XuanL.2013Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior294217248https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-122229040810.2753/MIS0742-1222290408Search in Google Scholar
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 177–184). IEEE.SuhB.HongL.PirolliP.ChiE. H.20102010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing177184IEEE10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33Search in Google Scholar
Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2020). Affective polarization in online climate change discourse on twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.13051.TyagiA.UyhengJ.CarleyK. M.2020Affective polarization in online climate change discourse on twitter10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381419Search in Google Scholar
Weng, L., Menczer, F., & Ahn, Y.-Y. (2013). Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports, 3, 2522. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02522WengL.MenczerF.AhnY.-Y.2013Virality prediction and community structure in social networks32522https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0252210.1038/srep02522Search in Google Scholar
Williams, H. T., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global environmental change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006WilliamsH. T.McMurrayJ. R.KurzT.LambertF. H.2015Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change32126138https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.00610.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.xYuanM.LinY.2006Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables6814967https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.xSearch in Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (2010). Sensation seeking. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1–4.ZuckermanM.2010Sensation seeking1410.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0843Search in Google Scholar