Uneingeschränkter Zugang

A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science


Zitieren

Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2016). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy 44(2), 246–258. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw058AksnesD. W.SivertsenG.van LeeuwenT. N.WendtK. K.2016Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicatorsScience and Public Policy44224625810.1093/scipol/scw058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Alperin, J. P. (2014). Citation databases omit local journals. Nature, 511(7508), 155–155. doi: 10.1038/511155cAlperinJ. P.2014Citation databases omit local journalsNature511750815515510.1038/511155c25008513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Lariviere, V. (2009). Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. 10.1002/asi.21062ArchambaultE.CampbellD.GingrasY.LariviereV.2009Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and ScopusJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6071320132610.1002/asi.21062Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Barnett, p., & Lascar, C. (2007). Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in Earth and atmospheric sciences. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 70. doi: 10.5062/F4W37T8CBarnettp.LascarC.2007Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in Earth and atmospheric sciencesIssues in Science & Technology Librarianship7010.5062/F4W37T8COpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1996). Publication types, citation rates and evaluation. Scientometrics 37(3), 437–494. doi: 10.1007/BF02019259BourkeP.ButlerL.1996Publication types, citation rates and evaluationScientometrics37343749410.1007/BF02019259Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chavarro, D. (2017). Universalism and particularism: Explaining the emergence and development of regional indexing systems. Brighton. (University of Sussex Ph.D. dissertation)ChavarroD.2017Universalism and particularism: Explaining the emergence and development of regional indexing systemsBrighton(University of Sussex Ph.D. dissertation)Search in Google Scholar

Clarivate Analytics. (2018). Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage. Retrieved from https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverageClarivateAnalytics.2018Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of CoverageRetrieved fromhttps://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverageSearch in Google Scholar

Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98(1), 197–209. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1036-2Collazo-ReyesF.2014Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each countryScientometrics98119720910.1007/s11192-013-1036-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Côté, G., Roberge, G., & Archambault, É. (2016). Bibliometrics and patent indicators for the science and engineering indicators 2016─Comparison of 2016 bibliometric indicators to 2014 indicators. Retrieved from http://www.science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports?page=1#/en/publications/reports/bibliometrics-and-patent-indicators-for-the-science-and-engineering-indicator-0CôtéG.RobergeG.ArchambaultÉ2016Bibliometrics and patent indicators for the science and engineering indicators 2016─Comparison of 2016 bibliometric indicators to 2014 indicatorsRetrieved fromhttp://www.science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports?page=1#/en/publications/reports/bibliometrics-and-patent-indicators-for-the-science-and-engineering-indicator-0Search in Google Scholar

Elsevier. (2017). Scopus. Content Coverage Guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/contentElsevier2017Scopus. Content Coverage GuideRetrieved fromhttps://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/contentSearch in Google Scholar

Franceschet, M. (2010). A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 83(1), 243–258. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2FranceschetM.2010A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google ScholarScientometrics83124325810.1007/s11192-009-0021-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.GarfieldE.1979Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, Technology and HumanitiesNew YorkJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar

Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21. doi:10.1108/14684520810865958GavelY.IselidL.2008Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap studyOnline Information Review32182110.1108/14684520810865958Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9HarzingA. W.AlakangasS.2016Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparisonScientometrics106278780410.1007/s11192-015-1798-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0217-xKoushaK.ThelwallM.2008Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplinesScientometrics74227329410.1007/s11192-008-0217-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lopez-Cozar, E. D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2014). The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate Bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446–454. doi:10.1002/asi.23056Lopez-CozarE. D.Robinson-GarciaN.Torres-SalinasD.2014The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate Bibliometric indicatorsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65344645410.1002/asi.23056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001Lopez-IllescasC.de Moya-AnegonF.MoedH. F.2008Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and ScopusJournal of Informetrics2430431610.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. doi:10.1002/asi.20677MehoL. I.YangK.2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholarJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58132105212510.1002/asi.20677Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.MoedH. F.2005Citation Analysis in Research EvaluationDordrechtSpringerSearch in Google Scholar

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5MongeonP.Paul-HusA.2016The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysisScientometrics106121322810.1007/s11192-015-1765-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2NederhofA. J.2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A reviewScientometrics6618110010.1007/s11192-006-0007-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Osca-Lluch, J., Miguel, S., Gonzalez, C., Penaranda-Ortega, M., & Quinones-Vidal, E. (2013). Coverage and overlap of the Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis of the Spanish scientific activity in Psychology. Anales De Psicologia, 29(3), 1025–1031. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.154911Osca-LluchJ.MiguelS.GonzalezC.Penaranda-OrtegaM.Quinones-VidalE.2013Coverage and overlap of the Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis of the Spanish scientific activity in PsychologyAnales De Psicologia2931025103110.6018/analesps.29.3.154911Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science-a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280–290. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs019OssenblokT. L. B.EngelsT. C. E.SivertsenG.2012The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science-a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9)Research Evaluation21428029010.1093/reseval/rvs019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). Coverage in Scopus vs. Web of Science of research produced in Latin America and the Caribbean. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 24(52), 13–27.SantaS.Herrero-SolanaV.2010Coverage in Scopus vs. Web of Science of research produced in Latin America and the Caribbean. Investigacion Bibliotecologica24521327Search in Google Scholar

Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. In Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference 2014 Leiden (pp. 598–604). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden – CWTS.SivertsenG.2014Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of ScienceProceedings of the science and technology indicators conference 2014 Leiden598604LeidenUniversiteit Leiden – CWTSSearch in Google Scholar

Sivertsen, G. (2016). Publication-based funding: The Norwegian Model. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H. D. Daniel (Eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures (pp. 79–90). Zürich: Springer Open.SivertsenG.2016Publication-based funding: The Norwegian ModelOchsnerM.HugS. E.DanielH. D.Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures7990ZürichSpringer OpenSearch in Google Scholar

Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3SivertsenG.LarsenB.2012Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potentialScientometrics91256757510.1007/s11192-011-0615-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: a problematic relationship? Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, band 2.Van LeeuwenT.2013Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: a problematic relationship?Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschungband 2Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2543-683X
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Informatik, Informationstechnik, Projektmanagement, Datanbanken und Data Mining