This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2016). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy 44(2), 246–258. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw058AksnesD. W.SivertsenG.van LeeuwenT. N.WendtK. K.2016Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators44224625810.1093/scipol/scw058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alperin, J. P. (2014). Citation databases omit local journals. Nature, 511(7508), 155–155. doi: 10.1038/511155cAlperinJ. P.2014Citation databases omit local journals511750815515510.1038/511155c25008513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Lariviere, V. (2009). Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. 10.1002/asi.21062ArchambaultE.CampbellD.GingrasY.LariviereV.2009Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and Scopus6071320132610.1002/asi.21062Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barnett, p., & Lascar, C. (2007). Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in Earth and atmospheric sciences. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 70. doi: 10.5062/F4W37T8CBarnettp.LascarC.2007Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in Earth and atmospheric sciences7010.5062/F4W37T8COpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1996). Publication types, citation rates and evaluation. Scientometrics 37(3), 437–494. doi: 10.1007/BF02019259BourkeP.ButlerL.1996Publication types, citation rates and evaluation37343749410.1007/BF02019259Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chavarro, D. (2017). Universalism and particularism: Explaining the emergence and development of regional indexing systems. Brighton. (University of Sussex Ph.D. dissertation)ChavarroD.2017Brighton(University of Sussex Ph.D. dissertation)Search in Google Scholar
Clarivate Analytics. (2018). Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage. Retrieved from https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverageClarivateAnalytics.2018Retrieved fromhttps://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverageSearch in Google Scholar
Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98(1), 197–209. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1036-2Collazo-ReyesF.2014Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each country98119720910.1007/s11192-013-1036-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Côté, G., Roberge, G., & Archambault, É. (2016). Bibliometrics and patent indicators for the science and engineering indicators 2016─Comparison of 2016 bibliometric indicators to 2014 indicators. Retrieved from http://www.science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports?page=1#/en/publications/reports/bibliometrics-and-patent-indicators-for-the-science-and-engineering-indicator-0CôtéG.RobergeG.ArchambaultÉ2016Retrieved fromhttp://www.science-metrix.com/en/publications/reports?page=1#/en/publications/reports/bibliometrics-and-patent-indicators-for-the-science-and-engineering-indicator-0Search in Google Scholar
Elsevier. (2017). Scopus. Content Coverage Guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/contentElsevier2017Retrieved fromhttps://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/contentSearch in Google Scholar
Franceschet, M. (2010). A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 83(1), 243–258. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2FranceschetM.2010A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar83124325810.1007/s11192-009-0021-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.GarfieldE.1979New YorkJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21. doi:10.1108/14684520810865958GavelY.IselidL.2008Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study32182110.1108/14684520810865958Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9HarzingA. W.AlakangasS.2016Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison106278780410.1007/s11192-015-1798-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0217-xKoushaK.ThelwallM.2008Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines74227329410.1007/s11192-008-0217-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lopez-Cozar, E. D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2014). The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate Bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446–454. doi:10.1002/asi.23056Lopez-CozarE. D.Robinson-GarciaN.Torres-SalinasD.2014The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate Bibliometric indicators65344645410.1002/asi.23056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001Lopez-IllescasC.de Moya-AnegonF.MoedH. F.2008Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus2430431610.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. doi:10.1002/asi.20677MehoL. I.YangK.2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar58132105212510.1002/asi.20677Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.MoedH. F.2005DordrechtSpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5MongeonP.Paul-HusA.2016The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis106121322810.1007/s11192-015-1765-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2NederhofA. J.2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review6618110010.1007/s11192-006-0007-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Osca-Lluch, J., Miguel, S., Gonzalez, C., Penaranda-Ortega, M., & Quinones-Vidal, E. (2013). Coverage and overlap of the Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis of the Spanish scientific activity in Psychology. Anales De Psicologia, 29(3), 1025–1031. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.154911Osca-LluchJ.MiguelS.GonzalezC.Penaranda-OrtegaM.Quinones-VidalE.2013Coverage and overlap of the Web of Science and Scopus in the analysis of the Spanish scientific activity in Psychology2931025103110.6018/analesps.29.3.154911Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science-a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280–290. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs019OssenblokT. L. B.EngelsT. C. E.SivertsenG.2012The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science-a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9)21428029010.1093/reseval/rvs019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). Coverage in Scopus vs. Web of Science of research produced in Latin America and the Caribbean. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 24(52), 13–27.SantaS.Herrero-SolanaV.201024521327Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. In Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference 2014 Leiden (pp. 598–604). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden – CWTS.SivertsenG.2014Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science598604LeidenUniversiteit Leiden – CWTSSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016). Publication-based funding: The Norwegian Model. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H. D. Daniel (Eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures (pp. 79–90). Zürich: Springer Open.SivertsenG.2016OchsnerM.HugS. E.DanielH. D.Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures7990ZürichSpringer OpenSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3SivertsenG.LarsenB.2012Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential91256757510.1007/s11192-011-0615-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: a problematic relationship? Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, band 2.Van LeeuwenT.2013Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschungband 2Search in Google Scholar