<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec id="j_jdis-2019-0001_s_006_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c17b1Aa"><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to assess the coverage of the scientific literature in Scopus and Web of Science from the perspective of research evaluation.</p></sec><sec id="j_jdis-2019-0001_s_007_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c17b2Aa"><h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3><p>The academic communities of Norway have agreed on certain criteria for what should be included as original research publications in research evaluation and funding contexts. These criteria have been applied since 2004 in a comprehensive bibliographic database called the Norwegian Science Index (NSI). The relative coverages of Scopus and Web of Science are compared with regard to publication type, field of research and language.</p></sec><sec id="j_jdis-2019-0001_s_008_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c17b3Aa"><h3>Findings</h3><p>Our results show that Scopus covers 72 percent of the total Norwegian scientific and scholarly publication output in 2015 and 2016, while the corresponding figure for Web of Science Core Collection is 69 percent. The coverages are most comprehensive in medicine and health (89 and 87 percent) and in the natural sciences and technology (85 and 84 percent). The social sciences (48 percent in Scopus and 40 percent in Web of Science Core Collection) and particularly the humanities (27 and 23 percent) are much less covered in the two international data sources.</p></sec><sec id="j_jdis-2019-0001_s_009_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c17b4Aa"><h3>Research limitation</h3><p>Comparing with data from only one country is a limitation of the study, but the criteria used to define a country’s scientific output as well as the identification of patterns of field-dependent partial representations in Scopus and Web of Science should be recognizable and useful also for other countries.</p></sec><sec id="j_jdis-2019-0001_s_010_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c17b5Aa"><h3>Originality/value</h3><p>The novelty of this study is the criteria-based approach to studying coverage problems in the two data sources.</p></sec></abstract>

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the coverage of the scientific literature in Scopus and Web of Science from the perspective of research evaluation.Design/methodology/approachThe academic communities of Norway have agreed on certain criteria for what should be included as original research publications in research evaluation and funding contexts. These criteria have been applied since 2004 in a comprehensive bibliographic database called the Norwegian Science Index (NSI). The relative coverages of Scopus and Web of Science are compared with regard to publication type, field of research and language.FindingsOur results show that Scopus covers 72 percent of the total Norwegian scientific and scholarly publication output in 2015 and 2016, while the corresponding figure for Web of Science Core Collection is 69 percent. The coverages are most comprehensive in medicine and health (89 and 87 percent) and in the natural sciences and technology (85 and 84 percent). The social sciences (48 percent in Scopus and 40 percent in Web of Science Core Collection) and particularly the humanities (27 and 23 percent) are much less covered in the two international data sources.Research limitationComparing with data from only one country is a limitation of the study, but the criteria used to define a country’s scientific output as well as the identification of patterns of field-dependent partial representations in Scopus and Web of Science should be recognizable and useful also for other countries.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study is the criteria-based approach to studying coverage problems in the two data sources.

A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

Journal of Data and Information Science

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science"}

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the coverage of the scientific literature in Scopus and Web of Science from the perspective of research...

A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

Article Category: Research Paper

Online veröffentlicht: 21. Feb. 2019

Seitenbereich: 1 - 21

Eingereicht: 01. Okt. 2018

Akzeptiert: 04. Dez. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001

Schlüsselwörter
Scopus; Web of Science, Norwegian Science Index, Research evaluation, Evaluation criteria, Scientific publications

© 2019 Dag W. Aksnes, Gunnar Sivertsen, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

Article Category: Research Paper

Online veröffentlicht: 21. Feb. 2019

Seitenbereich: 1 - 21

Eingereicht: 01. Okt. 2018

Akzeptiert: 04. Dez. 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001

SchlüsselwörterScopus; Web of Science, Norwegian Science Index, Research evaluation, Evaluation criteria, Scientific publications

© 2019 Dag W. Aksnes, Gunnar Sivertsen, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Scopus; Web of Science, Norwegian Science Index, Research evaluation, Evaluation criteria, Scientific publications